利用物理信息机器学习从偏置井钻井参数生成实时伽马射线测井曲线

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM SPE Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.2118/212445-pa
Prasham Sheth, Sailaja Sistla, Indranil Roychoudhury, Mengdi Gao, Crispin Chatar, Jose Celaya, Priya Mishra
{"title":"利用物理信息机器学习从偏置井钻井参数生成实时伽马射线测井曲线","authors":"Prasham Sheth, Sailaja Sistla, Indranil Roychoudhury, Mengdi Gao, Crispin Chatar, Jose Celaya, Priya Mishra","doi":"10.2118/212445-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By 2026, USD 5.05 billion will be spent per year on logging while drilling (LWD) according to the market report from Fortune Business Insights (2020). Logging tools and wireline tools are costly services for operators to pay for, and the companies providing the services also have a high cost of service delivery. They are, however, an essential service for drilling wells efficiently. The ability to computationally generate logs in real time using known relationships between the rock formations and drilling parameters, namely, rate of penetration (ROP), rotations per minute (RPM), surface weight on bit (SWOB), surface torque (TQX), standpipe pressure (SPPA), and hookload (HKLD), provides an alternative method to generate formation evaluation information (analysis of the subsurface formation characteristics such as lithology, porosity, permeability, and saturation). This paper describes an approach to creating a digital formation evaluation log generator using a novel physics-informed machine learning (PIML) approach that combines physics-based approaches with machine learning (ML) algorithms. The designed approach consists of blocks that calculate mechanical specific energy (MSE), physical estimates of gamma ray (GR) using physical and empirical models, and formation information. All this information and the drilling parameters are used to build a classification model to predict the formations, followed by formation-based regression models to get the final estimate of GR log. The designed PIML approach learns the relationships between drilling parameters and the GR logs using the data from the offset wells. The decomposition of the model into multiple stages enables the model to learn the relationship between drilling parameters data and formation evaluation data. It makes it easier for the model to generate GR measurements consistent with the rock formations of the subject well being drilled. Because the computationally generated GR by the model is not just dependent on the relationships between drilling parameters and GR logs, this model is also generalizable and capable of being deployed into the application with only retraining on the offset wells and no change in the model structure or complexity. For this paper, the drilling of the horizontal section will not be discussed, as this was done as a separate body of work. Historically collected data from the US Land Permian Basin wells are used as the primary data set for this work. Results from the experiments based on the data collected from five different wells have been presented. Leave-one-out validation for each of the wells was performed. In the leave-one-out validation process, four of the wells represent the set of offset wells and the remaining one becomes the subject well. The same process is repeated for each of the wells as they are in turn defined as a subject well. Results show that the framework can infer and generate logs such as GR logs in real time. The average root-mean-squared error (RMSE) observed from the experiments is 27.25 api, representing about 10% error. This error value is calculated based on the mean estimate and does not consider the predicted confidence interval. Considering the confidence interval helps further reduce the error margin.","PeriodicalId":22252,"journal":{"name":"SPE Journal","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-Time Gamma Ray Log Generation from Drilling Parameters of Offset Wells Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Prasham Sheth, Sailaja Sistla, Indranil Roychoudhury, Mengdi Gao, Crispin Chatar, Jose Celaya, Priya Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/212445-pa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By 2026, USD 5.05 billion will be spent per year on logging while drilling (LWD) according to the market report from Fortune Business Insights (2020). Logging tools and wireline tools are costly services for operators to pay for, and the companies providing the services also have a high cost of service delivery. They are, however, an essential service for drilling wells efficiently. The ability to computationally generate logs in real time using known relationships between the rock formations and drilling parameters, namely, rate of penetration (ROP), rotations per minute (RPM), surface weight on bit (SWOB), surface torque (TQX), standpipe pressure (SPPA), and hookload (HKLD), provides an alternative method to generate formation evaluation information (analysis of the subsurface formation characteristics such as lithology, porosity, permeability, and saturation). This paper describes an approach to creating a digital formation evaluation log generator using a novel physics-informed machine learning (PIML) approach that combines physics-based approaches with machine learning (ML) algorithms. The designed approach consists of blocks that calculate mechanical specific energy (MSE), physical estimates of gamma ray (GR) using physical and empirical models, and formation information. All this information and the drilling parameters are used to build a classification model to predict the formations, followed by formation-based regression models to get the final estimate of GR log. The designed PIML approach learns the relationships between drilling parameters and the GR logs using the data from the offset wells. The decomposition of the model into multiple stages enables the model to learn the relationship between drilling parameters data and formation evaluation data. It makes it easier for the model to generate GR measurements consistent with the rock formations of the subject well being drilled. Because the computationally generated GR by the model is not just dependent on the relationships between drilling parameters and GR logs, this model is also generalizable and capable of being deployed into the application with only retraining on the offset wells and no change in the model structure or complexity. For this paper, the drilling of the horizontal section will not be discussed, as this was done as a separate body of work. Historically collected data from the US Land Permian Basin wells are used as the primary data set for this work. Results from the experiments based on the data collected from five different wells have been presented. Leave-one-out validation for each of the wells was performed. In the leave-one-out validation process, four of the wells represent the set of offset wells and the remaining one becomes the subject well. The same process is repeated for each of the wells as they are in turn defined as a subject well. Results show that the framework can infer and generate logs such as GR logs in real time. The average root-mean-squared error (RMSE) observed from the experiments is 27.25 api, representing about 10% error. This error value is calculated based on the mean estimate and does not consider the predicted confidence interval. Considering the confidence interval helps further reduce the error margin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPE Journal\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPE Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/212445-pa\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212445-pa","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据《财富商业洞察》(2020 年)的市场报告,到 2026 年,每年用于钻井测井(LWD)的费用将达到 50.5 亿美元。对于运营商来说,测井工具和有线工具是成本高昂的服务,而提供这些服务的公司的服务成本也很高。然而,它们却是高效钻井的基本服务。利用岩层与钻井参数(即穿透率 (ROP)、每分钟转数 (RPM)、钻头表面重量 (SWOB)、表面扭矩 (TQX)、立管压力 (SPPA) 和钩载 (HKLD))之间的已知关系实时计算生成测井曲线的能力,为生成岩层评价信息(分析岩性、孔隙度、渗透率和饱和度等地下岩层特征)提供了另一种方法。本文介绍了一种使用新颖的物理信息机器学习(PIML)方法创建数字地层评价测井仪的方法,该方法结合了基于物理的方法和机器学习(ML)算法。所设计的方法由计算机械比能(MSE)、使用物理和经验模型对伽马射线(GR)进行物理估算以及地层信息的模块组成。所有这些信息和钻井参数都用于建立预测地层的分类模型,然后通过基于地层的回归模型来获得伽马测井曲线的最终估算值。 所设计的 PIML 方法利用偏移井的数据学习钻井参数与 GR 测井曲线之间的关系。将模型分解为多个阶段使模型能够学习钻井参数数据与地层评价数据之间的关系。这使得模型更容易生成与钻探对象井岩层一致的 GR 测量结果。由于该模型通过计算生成的 GR 不仅取决于钻井参数和 GR 测井曲线之间的关系,因此该模型还具有通用性,只需在偏移井上重新训练,模型结构或复杂性不变,即可部署到应用中。本文将不讨论水平段的钻井情况,因为这是一项单独的工作。 从美国陆地二叠纪盆地油井中收集的历史数据被用作这项工作的主要数据集。实验结果基于从五个不同油井收集的数据。对每口油井都进行了剔除验证。在剔除验证过程中,其中四口井代表一组偏移井,剩下一口井成为主体井。当每口井依次被定义为主体井时,重复同样的过程。结果表明,该框架可以实时推断和生成测井曲线,如 GR 测井曲线。实验观察到的平均均方根误差(RMSE)为 27.25 api,误差约为 10%。这个误差值是根据平均估计值计算的,没有考虑预测的置信区间。考虑置信区间有助于进一步缩小误差范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-Time Gamma Ray Log Generation from Drilling Parameters of Offset Wells Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning
By 2026, USD 5.05 billion will be spent per year on logging while drilling (LWD) according to the market report from Fortune Business Insights (2020). Logging tools and wireline tools are costly services for operators to pay for, and the companies providing the services also have a high cost of service delivery. They are, however, an essential service for drilling wells efficiently. The ability to computationally generate logs in real time using known relationships between the rock formations and drilling parameters, namely, rate of penetration (ROP), rotations per minute (RPM), surface weight on bit (SWOB), surface torque (TQX), standpipe pressure (SPPA), and hookload (HKLD), provides an alternative method to generate formation evaluation information (analysis of the subsurface formation characteristics such as lithology, porosity, permeability, and saturation). This paper describes an approach to creating a digital formation evaluation log generator using a novel physics-informed machine learning (PIML) approach that combines physics-based approaches with machine learning (ML) algorithms. The designed approach consists of blocks that calculate mechanical specific energy (MSE), physical estimates of gamma ray (GR) using physical and empirical models, and formation information. All this information and the drilling parameters are used to build a classification model to predict the formations, followed by formation-based regression models to get the final estimate of GR log. The designed PIML approach learns the relationships between drilling parameters and the GR logs using the data from the offset wells. The decomposition of the model into multiple stages enables the model to learn the relationship between drilling parameters data and formation evaluation data. It makes it easier for the model to generate GR measurements consistent with the rock formations of the subject well being drilled. Because the computationally generated GR by the model is not just dependent on the relationships between drilling parameters and GR logs, this model is also generalizable and capable of being deployed into the application with only retraining on the offset wells and no change in the model structure or complexity. For this paper, the drilling of the horizontal section will not be discussed, as this was done as a separate body of work. Historically collected data from the US Land Permian Basin wells are used as the primary data set for this work. Results from the experiments based on the data collected from five different wells have been presented. Leave-one-out validation for each of the wells was performed. In the leave-one-out validation process, four of the wells represent the set of offset wells and the remaining one becomes the subject well. The same process is repeated for each of the wells as they are in turn defined as a subject well. Results show that the framework can infer and generate logs such as GR logs in real time. The average root-mean-squared error (RMSE) observed from the experiments is 27.25 api, representing about 10% error. This error value is calculated based on the mean estimate and does not consider the predicted confidence interval. Considering the confidence interval helps further reduce the error margin.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SPE Journal
SPE Journal 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
229
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Covers theories and emerging concepts spanning all aspects of engineering for oil and gas exploration and production, including reservoir characterization, multiphase flow, drilling dynamics, well architecture, gas well deliverability, numerical simulation, enhanced oil recovery, CO2 sequestration, and benchmarking and performance indicators.
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity Analysis and Comparative Study for Different Detection Modes of Logging-While-Drilling Ultradeep Azimuthal Electromagnetic Tools A Grain Size Profile Prediction Method Based on Combined Model of Extreme Gradient Boosting and Artificial Neural Network and Its Application in Sand Control Design Dynamic Scaling Prediction Model and Application in Near-Wellbore Formation of Ultradeep Natural Gas Reservoirs Injection Temperature Impacts on Reservoir Response during CO2 Storage Virtual Meter with Flow Pattern Recognition Using Deep Learning Neural Networks: Experiments and Analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1