对美国疾病预防控制中心阿片类药物指南修订工作的监督:注定失败的过程

R. Lawhern
{"title":"对美国疾病预防控制中心阿片类药物指南修订工作的监督:注定失败的过程","authors":"R. Lawhern","doi":"10.33425/2639-9474.1253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In December 2019, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced their intention to review and revise their 2016 Guideline on Prescription of Opioids to Adults. As part of this revision, CDC solicited nominations for an advisory “Opioid Workgroup” to report to the Board of Scientific Counselors of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. This paper offers a critical review of concerns identified in the final Workgroup report of July 2021, as contrasted against the revised and expanded guidelines published 16 months later in November 2022. The author finds that although the Workgroup was tasked to identify substantive issues, its input to the CDC was largely marginalized or ignored in the revised guidelines. The workgroup also failed to reach consensus on central issues of methodology, which should disqualify the CDC guidelines as a de factor standard of clinical practice. Arguably, the CDC should be removed from all further participation in development of public policy for the treatment of severe pain.","PeriodicalId":158343,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Primary Care","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oversight on Revision of US CDC Opioid Guidelines: A Process Pre- Destined to Fail\",\"authors\":\"R. Lawhern\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2639-9474.1253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In December 2019, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced their intention to review and revise their 2016 Guideline on Prescription of Opioids to Adults. As part of this revision, CDC solicited nominations for an advisory “Opioid Workgroup” to report to the Board of Scientific Counselors of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. This paper offers a critical review of concerns identified in the final Workgroup report of July 2021, as contrasted against the revised and expanded guidelines published 16 months later in November 2022. The author finds that although the Workgroup was tasked to identify substantive issues, its input to the CDC was largely marginalized or ignored in the revised guidelines. The workgroup also failed to reach consensus on central issues of methodology, which should disqualify the CDC guidelines as a de factor standard of clinical practice. Arguably, the CDC should be removed from all further participation in development of public policy for the treatment of severe pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing & Primary Care\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing & Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9474.1253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9474.1253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019 年 12 月,美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)宣布打算审查和修订其 2016 年《成人阿片类药物处方指南》。作为修订工作的一部分,美国疾病预防控制中心征集了咨询 "阿片类药物工作组 "的提名,该工作组将向国家伤害预防与控制中心科学顾问委员会报告。本文对工作组 2021 年 7 月的最终报告中提出的问题进行了批判性回顾,并与 16 个月后于 2022 年 11 月发布的修订和扩充指南进行了对比。作者发现,尽管工作组的任务是确定实质性问题,但在修订后的指南中,工作组向疾病预防控制中心提出的意见在很大程度上被边缘化或被忽视。工作组也未能就方法论的核心问题达成共识,这应该会使疾病预防控制中心的指南失去作为临床实践标准的资格。可以说,疾病预防控制中心应该不再参与制定有关治疗剧痛的公共政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oversight on Revision of US CDC Opioid Guidelines: A Process Pre- Destined to Fail
In December 2019, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced their intention to review and revise their 2016 Guideline on Prescription of Opioids to Adults. As part of this revision, CDC solicited nominations for an advisory “Opioid Workgroup” to report to the Board of Scientific Counselors of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. This paper offers a critical review of concerns identified in the final Workgroup report of July 2021, as contrasted against the revised and expanded guidelines published 16 months later in November 2022. The author finds that although the Workgroup was tasked to identify substantive issues, its input to the CDC was largely marginalized or ignored in the revised guidelines. The workgroup also failed to reach consensus on central issues of methodology, which should disqualify the CDC guidelines as a de factor standard of clinical practice. Arguably, the CDC should be removed from all further participation in development of public policy for the treatment of severe pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Functional Outcome after Lateral Surgical Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty Enhancing Knowledge of Registered Nurses Working in the Primary Care Setting CAUTI Elimination: A Systematic Elimination of CAUTI in Long-Term Care Facility Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients’ Needs Assessment in Primary Care Setting: The Quiddity of Attitude in Quality Improvement Oversight on Revision of US CDC Opioid Guidelines: A Process Pre- Destined to Fail
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1