学生意见对评价的影响率:大学、图书馆、课程和教授

U. Tudevdagva, Narantsatsral Delgerkhuu, Gansaikhan Osorkhuu, Batdorj Davaagombo, Yeruulbat Galbadrakh, Serjmyadag Sergelen
{"title":"学生意见对评价的影响率:大学、图书馆、课程和教授","authors":"U. Tudevdagva, Narantsatsral Delgerkhuu, Gansaikhan Osorkhuu, Batdorj Davaagombo, Yeruulbat Galbadrakh, Serjmyadag Sergelen","doi":"10.14464/ess.v10i7.631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a cooperative study of university lecturers with a focus on figuring out influence factors of students’ achievements in higher education. The evaluation survey is applied as the main method for research. Several lecturers (research team) who teach different courses in the university together developed influence factors in the form of survey questions, which are divided into four core groups: university, library, courses, and professors. The research team plans to collect as much data periodically from all universities in the country which is open to supporting this study. This paper showed the analyses of the first step of the study. 291 students from eight different universities voluntarily sent responses to an online survey.The collected data is processed by structure-oriented evaluation (SURE) model and by standard statistic function. The SURE evaluation score was calculated as 0.88 which we can read that all defined influence factors received evaluation scores from students with very high positive answers. The statistic maximum scores emphasized some factors that influence a lot to students’ achievement and students confirmed by their responses that some factors are very important for them. Further statistic ANOVA test was made for the case of the university group with 13 factors.For the ANOVA test, the null hypothesis. H0 – Null hypothesis stands for no difference between groups. No influence of study years on evaluation scores. By the ANOVA test, the null hypothesis isn’t proven. This concludes first step analyses as not significant statistically. Therefore, the researchteam needs to continue data collection and may apply some other statistical methods to compare the first results.","PeriodicalId":322203,"journal":{"name":"Embedded Selforganising Systems","volume":"230 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence Rate Evaluation by Students’ Opinion: University, Library, Courses and Professors\",\"authors\":\"U. Tudevdagva, Narantsatsral Delgerkhuu, Gansaikhan Osorkhuu, Batdorj Davaagombo, Yeruulbat Galbadrakh, Serjmyadag Sergelen\",\"doi\":\"10.14464/ess.v10i7.631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes a cooperative study of university lecturers with a focus on figuring out influence factors of students’ achievements in higher education. The evaluation survey is applied as the main method for research. Several lecturers (research team) who teach different courses in the university together developed influence factors in the form of survey questions, which are divided into four core groups: university, library, courses, and professors. The research team plans to collect as much data periodically from all universities in the country which is open to supporting this study. This paper showed the analyses of the first step of the study. 291 students from eight different universities voluntarily sent responses to an online survey.The collected data is processed by structure-oriented evaluation (SURE) model and by standard statistic function. The SURE evaluation score was calculated as 0.88 which we can read that all defined influence factors received evaluation scores from students with very high positive answers. The statistic maximum scores emphasized some factors that influence a lot to students’ achievement and students confirmed by their responses that some factors are very important for them. Further statistic ANOVA test was made for the case of the university group with 13 factors.For the ANOVA test, the null hypothesis. H0 – Null hypothesis stands for no difference between groups. No influence of study years on evaluation scores. By the ANOVA test, the null hypothesis isn’t proven. This concludes first step analyses as not significant statistically. Therefore, the researchteam needs to continue data collection and may apply some other statistical methods to compare the first results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Embedded Selforganising Systems\",\"volume\":\"230 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Embedded Selforganising Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14464/ess.v10i7.631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Embedded Selforganising Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14464/ess.v10i7.631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一项针对大学讲师的合作研究,其重点是找出影响学生在高等教育中取得成就的因素。评价调查是研究的主要方法。在大学里教授不同课程的几位讲师(研究小组)以调查问题的形式共同制定了影响因素,分为四个核心组:大学、图书馆、课程和教授。研究小组计划定期从全国所有愿意支持本研究的大学收集尽可能多的数据。本文展示了第一步研究的分析结果。来自八所不同大学的 291 名学生自愿参与了在线调查,收集到的数据通过面向结构的评价(SURE)模型和标准统计函数进行了处理。计算得出的 SURE 评价分值为 0.88,由此可以看出,所有定义的影响因素都得到了学生非常积极的评价分值。统计最高分强调了一些对学生成绩影响很大的因素,学生通过回答确认了一些因素对他们非常重要。对大学组的 13 个因素进行了进一步的方差分析检验。H0 - 假设表示组间无差异。学习年限对评价分数没有影响。通过方差分析检验,零假设没有得到证实。因此,第一步的分析结果在统计学上并不显著。因此,研究小组需要继续收集数据,并可能采用其他统计方法对初步结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence Rate Evaluation by Students’ Opinion: University, Library, Courses and Professors
This paper describes a cooperative study of university lecturers with a focus on figuring out influence factors of students’ achievements in higher education. The evaluation survey is applied as the main method for research. Several lecturers (research team) who teach different courses in the university together developed influence factors in the form of survey questions, which are divided into four core groups: university, library, courses, and professors. The research team plans to collect as much data periodically from all universities in the country which is open to supporting this study. This paper showed the analyses of the first step of the study. 291 students from eight different universities voluntarily sent responses to an online survey.The collected data is processed by structure-oriented evaluation (SURE) model and by standard statistic function. The SURE evaluation score was calculated as 0.88 which we can read that all defined influence factors received evaluation scores from students with very high positive answers. The statistic maximum scores emphasized some factors that influence a lot to students’ achievement and students confirmed by their responses that some factors are very important for them. Further statistic ANOVA test was made for the case of the university group with 13 factors.For the ANOVA test, the null hypothesis. H0 – Null hypothesis stands for no difference between groups. No influence of study years on evaluation scores. By the ANOVA test, the null hypothesis isn’t proven. This concludes first step analyses as not significant statistically. Therefore, the researchteam needs to continue data collection and may apply some other statistical methods to compare the first results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Training in The Successful Implementation of Hospital Information Systems Introduction to the Proceedings of the ISCSET 2023 Learning Styles and Cultural Differences: A comparative study of cultural differences in Austrian and Mongolian Students Developing Information Competences of the Students in Technical Direction with Helping the Technology of “Network Boomerang” Principles Some Results and Evaluation of Training for the Development of Students’ Spatial Visualization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1