对晚期头颈部癌症患者进行 Octa 射线与 Quad 射线姑息放疗的比较评估

S. Jakhar, Shankar Singh Dhaka, S. Dhaka, Rajesh Kumar, Guman Singh, N. Sharma, Dr H. S. Kumar
{"title":"对晚期头颈部癌症患者进行 Octa 射线与 Quad 射线姑息放疗的比较评估","authors":"S. Jakhar, Shankar Singh Dhaka, S. Dhaka, Rajesh Kumar, Guman Singh, N. Sharma, Dr H. S. Kumar","doi":"10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.3.533-537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Majority of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer patients in India present in advanced stages. They are not candidates for multimodality treatment due to loco-regionally advanced disease and poor performance status. Hypo-fractionated regimens have been used for palliation of advanced head and neck cancers. Purpose: The purpose of this study to compare the acute and late toxicity and overall response of octa shot and quad shot radiation therapy as palliative regime in locally advanced head and neck cancers.Materials and methods: A hospital based prospective, randomized study was conducted with 50 patients of advanced Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck, 25 patients taken in each arm. Two fractions(3.5Gy/#) per day six hours apart was given in four consecutive days (Octa shot). Two fractions (3.5Gy/#) per day six hours apart was given in two consecutive days repeated for one more cycle with a interval of two weeks (Quad shot). Acute toxicities monitored at day 15 &30 and late at 3 & 6 months after the treatment started. Results: Octa shot had slightly better loco-regional control but the difference was statistically insignificant. Octa shot had more grade 2 skin and mucosal reaction than Quad shot. Symptomatic relief, subjective regression and improved QOL were better in Octa shot than Quad shot. Conclusion: The study concludes that “octa shot” is an effective palliative radiotherapy regime with greater yet manageable toxicity in comparison to Quad shot regimen. This regime not only strikes a balance between the economic burden, treatment time, machine load but also helps in selecting patients for further dose escalation based on treatment response and symptomatic relief. However more such trials with longer follow up and larger sample size are required for stronger evidences.","PeriodicalId":502165,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Octa Shot Versus Quad Shot Palliative Radiotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients\",\"authors\":\"S. Jakhar, Shankar Singh Dhaka, S. Dhaka, Rajesh Kumar, Guman Singh, N. Sharma, Dr H. S. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.3.533-537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Majority of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer patients in India present in advanced stages. They are not candidates for multimodality treatment due to loco-regionally advanced disease and poor performance status. Hypo-fractionated regimens have been used for palliation of advanced head and neck cancers. Purpose: The purpose of this study to compare the acute and late toxicity and overall response of octa shot and quad shot radiation therapy as palliative regime in locally advanced head and neck cancers.Materials and methods: A hospital based prospective, randomized study was conducted with 50 patients of advanced Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck, 25 patients taken in each arm. Two fractions(3.5Gy/#) per day six hours apart was given in four consecutive days (Octa shot). Two fractions (3.5Gy/#) per day six hours apart was given in two consecutive days repeated for one more cycle with a interval of two weeks (Quad shot). Acute toxicities monitored at day 15 &30 and late at 3 & 6 months after the treatment started. Results: Octa shot had slightly better loco-regional control but the difference was statistically insignificant. Octa shot had more grade 2 skin and mucosal reaction than Quad shot. Symptomatic relief, subjective regression and improved QOL were better in Octa shot than Quad shot. Conclusion: The study concludes that “octa shot” is an effective palliative radiotherapy regime with greater yet manageable toxicity in comparison to Quad shot regimen. This regime not only strikes a balance between the economic burden, treatment time, machine load but also helps in selecting patients for further dose escalation based on treatment response and symptomatic relief. However more such trials with longer follow up and larger sample size are required for stronger evidences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.3.533-537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.3.533-537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在印度,大多数头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者处于晚期。由于局部区域晚期疾病和表现不佳,他们不适合接受多模式治疗。低分次治疗方案已被用于晚期头颈部癌症的缓解治疗。目的:本研究旨在比较八次放疗和四次放疗作为局部晚期头颈部癌症姑息治疗方案的急性和晚期毒性以及总体反应:医院对50名晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者进行了前瞻性随机研究,每组25人。连续四天,每天两次(3.5Gy/#),每次间隔六小时(Octa 注射)。每天两次(3.5Gy/#),每次间隔六小时,连续两天重复一个周期,每次间隔两周(Quad shot)。在治疗开始后的第 15 天和第 30 天以及后期的 3 个月和 6 个月监测急性毒性。结果奥克塔注射液的局部区域控制效果稍好,但差异无统计学意义。与四联疗法相比,Octa疗法的2级皮肤和粘膜反应更多。在症状缓解、主观消退和 QOL 改善方面,Octa 注射优于 Quad 注射。结论研究得出结论,"Octa 射线 "是一种有效的姑息放疗方案,与 Quad 射线方案相比,其毒性更大,但可控。该方案不仅在经济负担、治疗时间、机器负荷之间取得了平衡,还有助于根据治疗反应和症状缓解情况选择进一步加大剂量的患者。不过,要想获得更有力的证据,还需要进行更多此类试验,并进行更长时间的随访和扩大样本量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Evaluation of Octa Shot Versus Quad Shot Palliative Radiotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Background: Majority of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer patients in India present in advanced stages. They are not candidates for multimodality treatment due to loco-regionally advanced disease and poor performance status. Hypo-fractionated regimens have been used for palliation of advanced head and neck cancers. Purpose: The purpose of this study to compare the acute and late toxicity and overall response of octa shot and quad shot radiation therapy as palliative regime in locally advanced head and neck cancers.Materials and methods: A hospital based prospective, randomized study was conducted with 50 patients of advanced Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck, 25 patients taken in each arm. Two fractions(3.5Gy/#) per day six hours apart was given in four consecutive days (Octa shot). Two fractions (3.5Gy/#) per day six hours apart was given in two consecutive days repeated for one more cycle with a interval of two weeks (Quad shot). Acute toxicities monitored at day 15 &30 and late at 3 & 6 months after the treatment started. Results: Octa shot had slightly better loco-regional control but the difference was statistically insignificant. Octa shot had more grade 2 skin and mucosal reaction than Quad shot. Symptomatic relief, subjective regression and improved QOL were better in Octa shot than Quad shot. Conclusion: The study concludes that “octa shot” is an effective palliative radiotherapy regime with greater yet manageable toxicity in comparison to Quad shot regimen. This regime not only strikes a balance between the economic burden, treatment time, machine load but also helps in selecting patients for further dose escalation based on treatment response and symptomatic relief. However more such trials with longer follow up and larger sample size are required for stronger evidences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radiotherapy Administration Checklist for Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy: Development and Validation Paediatric Mesenchymal Hamartoma of Liver-A Diagnostic Dilemma External Beam Radiotherapy for Dysphagia Palliation in Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Prospective Study Management and Immediate Outcome of Common Pediatric Oncological Emergencies from a Single Centre Factors Affecting the Survival of Patients with Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Tertiary Hospital in Indonesia: A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1