关于 "可切除胰腺癌新辅助化疗与前期手术的经验。一项横断面研究 "的通讯

Xue-Lei Li, Zhi-Peng Liu, Hai-Su Dai, Xian-Yu Yin, Zhi-Yu Chen
{"title":"关于 \"可切除胰腺癌新辅助化疗与前期手术的经验。一项横断面研究 \"的通讯","authors":"Xue-Lei Li, Zhi-Peng Liu, Hai-Su Dai, Xian-Yu Yin, Zhi-Yu Chen","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000000680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With great interest, we read the article by Su et al . [1] . This article is a single-center cross-sectional study involving an analysis of the prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgical treatment for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The authors collected clinical data of patients with stage I and stage II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who received treatment from a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2020, and a total of 159 patients were eligible after exclusion, including 46 patients (29%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group and 113 patients (71%) in the upfront resection (UR) group. They found that NAC is superior to UR in resectable pancreatic cancer with better survival. This is a great fi nding; however, after carefully reading the article, we would like to raise the following questions regarding some details","PeriodicalId":297147,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery (London, England)","volume":"87 1","pages":"4347 - 4348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A commentary on ‘The experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer. A cross sectional study’ – a correspondence\",\"authors\":\"Xue-Lei Li, Zhi-Peng Liu, Hai-Su Dai, Xian-Yu Yin, Zhi-Yu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000000680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With great interest, we read the article by Su et al . [1] . This article is a single-center cross-sectional study involving an analysis of the prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgical treatment for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The authors collected clinical data of patients with stage I and stage II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who received treatment from a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2020, and a total of 159 patients were eligible after exclusion, including 46 patients (29%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group and 113 patients (71%) in the upfront resection (UR) group. They found that NAC is superior to UR in resectable pancreatic cancer with better survival. This is a great fi nding; however, after carefully reading the article, we would like to raise the following questions regarding some details\",\"PeriodicalId\":297147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgery (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"4347 - 4348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgery (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们怀着极大的兴趣阅读了 Su 等人的文章 [1] 。这篇文章是一项单中心横断面研究,涉及可切除胰腺导管腺癌新辅助化疗与前期手术治疗的预后分析。作者收集了2013年至2020年期间在一家三甲医院接受治疗的I期和II期胰腺导管腺癌患者的临床数据,经排除后共有159名患者符合条件,其中新辅助化疗(NAC)组有46名患者(29%),前期切除(UR)组有113名患者(71%)。他们发现,在可切除的胰腺癌患者中,NAC优于UR,生存率更高。这是一个很好的发现;但是,在仔细阅读了这篇文章后,我们想就一些细节提出以下问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A commentary on ‘The experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer. A cross sectional study’ – a correspondence
With great interest, we read the article by Su et al . [1] . This article is a single-center cross-sectional study involving an analysis of the prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgical treatment for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The authors collected clinical data of patients with stage I and stage II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who received treatment from a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2020, and a total of 159 patients were eligible after exclusion, including 46 patients (29%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group and 113 patients (71%) in the upfront resection (UR) group. They found that NAC is superior to UR in resectable pancreatic cancer with better survival. This is a great fi nding; however, after carefully reading the article, we would like to raise the following questions regarding some details
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of pancreatectomy with arterial resection in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Association of systemic inflammatory markers and tertiary lymphoid structure with pathological complete response in gastric cancer patients receiving preoperative treatment: a retrospective cohort study The percentage of unnecessary mastectomy due to false size prediction using preoperative ultrasonography and MRI in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study Different therapeutic regimens in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer A novel skin grafting modality: prefabricated large sheet of postage-stamp autografts and allografts to repair extensive burn wounds; a prospective matched-control study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1