评估急诊科儿科行为医疗技术障碍和促进因素的探索性研究

Mitali Bhosekar, Shilpalakshmi Mena, Sahar Mihandoust, Anjali Joseph, K. Madathil
{"title":"评估急诊科儿科行为医疗技术障碍和促进因素的探索性研究","authors":"Mitali Bhosekar, Shilpalakshmi Mena, Sahar Mihandoust, Anjali Joseph, K. Madathil","doi":"10.1177/21695067231205571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to identify the technological barriers and facilitators of safe and effective pediatric mental and behavioral health care in emergency departments. The study, which involved a total of 4 participants, employed observational studies and semi-structured interviews to gather data from medical professionals across two hospitals. The data collected from the interviews were analyzed for themes relating to the use of technology, including factors that enable or impede safe and effective care for pediatric mental and behavioral health patients. Barriers included challenges related to software usability, inadequate training on newer software features, and concerns regarding the quality of service delivered by third-party vendors. Facilitators comprised the accessibility of clinician's notes, effective tools and technologies for clinician and patient safety, and efficient communication tools.","PeriodicalId":20673,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","volume":"46 1","pages":"2560 - 2563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Technological Barriers and Facilitators for Pediatric Behavioral Healthcare in Emergency Departments\",\"authors\":\"Mitali Bhosekar, Shilpalakshmi Mena, Sahar Mihandoust, Anjali Joseph, K. Madathil\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21695067231205571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study was to identify the technological barriers and facilitators of safe and effective pediatric mental and behavioral health care in emergency departments. The study, which involved a total of 4 participants, employed observational studies and semi-structured interviews to gather data from medical professionals across two hospitals. The data collected from the interviews were analyzed for themes relating to the use of technology, including factors that enable or impede safe and effective care for pediatric mental and behavioral health patients. Barriers included challenges related to software usability, inadequate training on newer software features, and concerns regarding the quality of service delivered by third-party vendors. Facilitators comprised the accessibility of clinician's notes, effective tools and technologies for clinician and patient safety, and efficient communication tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"2560 - 2563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231205571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231205571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定急诊科安全有效的儿科精神和行为健康护理的技术障碍和促进因素。这项研究共有 4 人参与,采用了观察研究和半结构式访谈的方法,从两家医院的医疗专业人员那里收集数据。研究人员对从访谈中收集到的数据进行了分析,以确定与技术使用相关的主题,包括能够或阻碍为儿科精神和行为健康患者提供安全有效护理的因素。障碍包括与软件可用性相关的挑战、对较新软件功能的培训不足以及对第三方供应商所提供服务质量的担忧。促进因素包括临床医生笔记的可访问性、促进临床医生和患者安全的有效工具和技术以及高效的通信工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Technological Barriers and Facilitators for Pediatric Behavioral Healthcare in Emergency Departments
The objective of this study was to identify the technological barriers and facilitators of safe and effective pediatric mental and behavioral health care in emergency departments. The study, which involved a total of 4 participants, employed observational studies and semi-structured interviews to gather data from medical professionals across two hospitals. The data collected from the interviews were analyzed for themes relating to the use of technology, including factors that enable or impede safe and effective care for pediatric mental and behavioral health patients. Barriers included challenges related to software usability, inadequate training on newer software features, and concerns regarding the quality of service delivered by third-party vendors. Facilitators comprised the accessibility of clinician's notes, effective tools and technologies for clinician and patient safety, and efficient communication tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Novel Application of Non-linear Dynamics Investigating Cognitive Workload and Situational Trust in Highly Automated Vehicles Inattentional Insensitivity As A Predictor of Relevant Situation Awareness Questions And Irrelevant Questions Transitioning Lab Courses to Online Platforms by Higher Education Institutions during COVID-19 A Novel Application of Non-linear Dynamics Investigating Cognitive Workload and Situational Trust in Highly Automated Vehicles Transitioning Lab Courses to Online Platforms by Higher Education Institutions during COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1