最大的安全性和最小的风险:由护士领导的血管通路和输液小组获得中线通路

Maciej Latos, M. Zawadka, D. Kosson
{"title":"最大的安全性和最小的风险:由护士领导的血管通路和输液小组获得中线通路","authors":"Maciej Latos, M. Zawadka, D. Kosson","doi":"10.2478/pielxxiw-2023-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim. The aim of the study was to conduct a retrospective analysis of cannulations done under ultrasound guidance by the Vascular Access and Infusion Team using the Seldinger technique. Material and methods. This observational study was retrospective in nature. Analysis was carried out of 82 cannulation charts reporting procedures from March to August 2022 at the University Clinical Centre of the Medical University of Warsaw. Results. Midline access was gained in 86 patients with a success rate of 95.3% (n=82). Cannulation by nurses was performed in 93% (n=80) of the patients. The procedure required an average of 1.62 attempts. The most frequently cannulated veins were the basilic (72%, n=59) and brachial (14.6%, n=12) ones. MC removal in 40.2% (n=33) of the cases was due to the termination of intravenous therapy, and in 23.4% (n=19) was caused by complications related to infusion management. Conclusions. Implantation of midline catheters in patients, including those with difficult intravenous access, can be done eff ectively with a minimum number of cannulation attempts. Maintaining midline catheters for the entire duration of therapy is challenging due to potential complications and requires rigorous care during their use. A detailed analysis of possible complications distinguishing between diff erent types of complications and continuous improvement of observation protocols and appropriate management is advisable. It is also advisable to plan and conduct an observational study in the area of retrospective analysis.","PeriodicalId":326203,"journal":{"name":"Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century","volume":"2012 1","pages":"125 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximum safety and minimum risk: midline access gained by a nurse-led Vascular Access and Infusion Team\",\"authors\":\"Maciej Latos, M. Zawadka, D. Kosson\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/pielxxiw-2023-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Aim. The aim of the study was to conduct a retrospective analysis of cannulations done under ultrasound guidance by the Vascular Access and Infusion Team using the Seldinger technique. Material and methods. This observational study was retrospective in nature. Analysis was carried out of 82 cannulation charts reporting procedures from March to August 2022 at the University Clinical Centre of the Medical University of Warsaw. Results. Midline access was gained in 86 patients with a success rate of 95.3% (n=82). Cannulation by nurses was performed in 93% (n=80) of the patients. The procedure required an average of 1.62 attempts. The most frequently cannulated veins were the basilic (72%, n=59) and brachial (14.6%, n=12) ones. MC removal in 40.2% (n=33) of the cases was due to the termination of intravenous therapy, and in 23.4% (n=19) was caused by complications related to infusion management. Conclusions. Implantation of midline catheters in patients, including those with difficult intravenous access, can be done eff ectively with a minimum number of cannulation attempts. Maintaining midline catheters for the entire duration of therapy is challenging due to potential complications and requires rigorous care during their use. A detailed analysis of possible complications distinguishing between diff erent types of complications and continuous improvement of observation protocols and appropriate management is advisable. It is also advisable to plan and conduct an observational study in the area of retrospective analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century\",\"volume\":\"2012 1\",\"pages\":\"125 - 131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/pielxxiw-2023-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pielxxiw-2023-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 目的。本研究旨在对血管通路和输液小组在超声引导下使用 Seldinger 技术进行的插管进行回顾性分析。材料和方法。本观察性研究为回顾性研究。对华沙医科大学大学临床中心 2022 年 3 月至 8 月期间报告的 82 份插管病历进行了分析。研究结果86名患者获得了中线入路,成功率为95.3%(n=82)。93%(80 人)的患者由护士进行了插管。手术平均需要 1.62 次尝试。最常插管的静脉是基底静脉(72%,人数=59)和肱静脉(14.6%,人数=12)。40.2%(33 人)的病例是由于终止静脉治疗而拔除 MC,23.4%(19 人)的病例是由于输液管理相关并发症而拔除 MC。结论为患者(包括静脉通路困难的患者)植入中线导管可有效减少插管次数。由于潜在的并发症,在整个治疗过程中保持中线导管是一项挑战,需要在使用过程中严格护理。最好对可能出现的并发症进行详细分析,区分不同类型的并发症,并不断改进观察方案和适当的处理方法。此外,在回顾性分析领域计划并开展一项观察研究也是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maximum safety and minimum risk: midline access gained by a nurse-led Vascular Access and Infusion Team
Abstract Aim. The aim of the study was to conduct a retrospective analysis of cannulations done under ultrasound guidance by the Vascular Access and Infusion Team using the Seldinger technique. Material and methods. This observational study was retrospective in nature. Analysis was carried out of 82 cannulation charts reporting procedures from March to August 2022 at the University Clinical Centre of the Medical University of Warsaw. Results. Midline access was gained in 86 patients with a success rate of 95.3% (n=82). Cannulation by nurses was performed in 93% (n=80) of the patients. The procedure required an average of 1.62 attempts. The most frequently cannulated veins were the basilic (72%, n=59) and brachial (14.6%, n=12) ones. MC removal in 40.2% (n=33) of the cases was due to the termination of intravenous therapy, and in 23.4% (n=19) was caused by complications related to infusion management. Conclusions. Implantation of midline catheters in patients, including those with difficult intravenous access, can be done eff ectively with a minimum number of cannulation attempts. Maintaining midline catheters for the entire duration of therapy is challenging due to potential complications and requires rigorous care during their use. A detailed analysis of possible complications distinguishing between diff erent types of complications and continuous improvement of observation protocols and appropriate management is advisable. It is also advisable to plan and conduct an observational study in the area of retrospective analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural intelligence and multicultural personality of novice nurses in the midst of the refugee crisis in Poland – a preliminary report Consumerism in health care – review of Polish and world literature Nurses’ views and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic The perception of ageism from the perspective of different professions Completed year of study moderating effect on the relation between coping strategies and self-esteem among novice nurses – cross sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1