拼图式教学法与传统教学法对 2022 年北呼罗珊医科大学检验科学专业学生学习寄生虫学课程的影响和动机的比较

{"title":"拼图式教学法与传统教学法对 2022 年北呼罗珊医科大学检验科学专业学生学习寄生虫学课程的影响和动机的比较","authors":"","doi":"10.32592/nkums.15.3.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The jigsaw method of learning is a student-centered educational method, and one of its approaches is students' active participation in the class. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare teaching with two methods of jigsaw and lectures on the learning and motivation of laboratory science students in parasitology courses. Method: This study was carried out based on a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical design. In this study, 25 laboratory science students participated and were assigned to two groups: jigsaw and traditional. In each session, the teacher assigned a topic for each member of the jigsaw groups, and the students were given a week to study the topic. Thereafter, in the educational method of jigsaw, each student explained the presented material to other members. In the traditional method, each session was conducted by a teacher. At the end, the lecture and jigsaw groups were tested with the same questions and the scores of the two groups were compared. Results: In the examination of the difference between the total score in the jigsaw and lecture groups using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, the mean and median of the total scores in the jigsaw method were higher than the traditional method, and this difference was statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Conclusion: Considering the many names of the parasitology course, hard learning, and students' complaints about the amount of content in this course, jigsaw can be a suitable method for teaching this course.","PeriodicalId":16423,"journal":{"name":"journal of north khorasan university of medical sciences","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Jigsaw and Traditional Teaching Methods on Learning and Motivation of Laboratory Science Students of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences in Parasitology Course in 2022\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.32592/nkums.15.3.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The jigsaw method of learning is a student-centered educational method, and one of its approaches is students' active participation in the class. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare teaching with two methods of jigsaw and lectures on the learning and motivation of laboratory science students in parasitology courses. Method: This study was carried out based on a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical design. In this study, 25 laboratory science students participated and were assigned to two groups: jigsaw and traditional. In each session, the teacher assigned a topic for each member of the jigsaw groups, and the students were given a week to study the topic. Thereafter, in the educational method of jigsaw, each student explained the presented material to other members. In the traditional method, each session was conducted by a teacher. At the end, the lecture and jigsaw groups were tested with the same questions and the scores of the two groups were compared. Results: In the examination of the difference between the total score in the jigsaw and lecture groups using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, the mean and median of the total scores in the jigsaw method were higher than the traditional method, and this difference was statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Conclusion: Considering the many names of the parasitology course, hard learning, and students' complaints about the amount of content in this course, jigsaw can be a suitable method for teaching this course.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"journal of north khorasan university of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"journal of north khorasan university of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32592/nkums.15.3.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of north khorasan university of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32592/nkums.15.3.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介拼图学习法是一种以学生为中心的教育方法,其方法之一是学生积极参与课堂。因此,本研究旨在比较拼图法和讲授法两种教学方法对寄生虫学课程实验科学生的学习和积极性的影响。研究方法本研究采用横断面描述性分析设计。在这项研究中,25 名实验科学专业的学生被分配到两组:拼图组和传统组。在每节课上,教师为拼图组的每位成员指定一个主题,学生有一周的时间学习该主题。之后,在拼图教学法中,每个学生向其他成员讲解所学材料。在传统方法中,每节课都由一名教师主持。最后,用相同的问题对讲课组和拼图组进行测试,并比较两组的得分。结果:用非参数曼-惠特尼 U 检验法检验拼图组和讲授组总分的差异,拼图法总分的平均值和中位数均高于传统方法,在 95% 的置信水平下,这一差异具有统计学意义。结论考虑到寄生虫学课程名称多、学习难度大,以及学生对课程内容多的抱怨,拼图法不失为一种适合该课程的教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Jigsaw and Traditional Teaching Methods on Learning and Motivation of Laboratory Science Students of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences in Parasitology Course in 2022
Introduction: The jigsaw method of learning is a student-centered educational method, and one of its approaches is students' active participation in the class. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare teaching with two methods of jigsaw and lectures on the learning and motivation of laboratory science students in parasitology courses. Method: This study was carried out based on a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical design. In this study, 25 laboratory science students participated and were assigned to two groups: jigsaw and traditional. In each session, the teacher assigned a topic for each member of the jigsaw groups, and the students were given a week to study the topic. Thereafter, in the educational method of jigsaw, each student explained the presented material to other members. In the traditional method, each session was conducted by a teacher. At the end, the lecture and jigsaw groups were tested with the same questions and the scores of the two groups were compared. Results: In the examination of the difference between the total score in the jigsaw and lecture groups using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, the mean and median of the total scores in the jigsaw method were higher than the traditional method, and this difference was statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Conclusion: Considering the many names of the parasitology course, hard learning, and students' complaints about the amount of content in this course, jigsaw can be a suitable method for teaching this course.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Jigsaw and Traditional Teaching Methods on Learning and Motivation of Laboratory Science Students of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences in Parasitology Course in 2022 Effects of Citicoline and Atorvastatin Administration on the Regenerative Capacity of the Distal Segment of the Transected Sciatic Nerve in Conditions of Delayed Nerve Repair Effect of Two Types of Aerobic Exercise Programs on NT4 Gene Expression and Motor Performance in Spinally Injured Rats Effect of Hydroalcoholic Extract of Ginger on Cardiac Parameters in Male Rats with Renovascular Hypertension Comparison of the Frequency of Vaginal Infections in Women with Premature Delivery and Women with Term Delivery in Ali Ibn Abitaleb Hospital of Zahedan in 2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1