{"title":"尸体上的闭孔静脉及其解剖变异:描述性研究","authors":"S. Sakthivel, K. Sarala Devi, Suman Verma","doi":"10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_70_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The obturator vein (OV) is formed in the proximal adductor region and traverses through the obturator foramen to terminate in the internal iliac vein (IIV). It is occasionally replaced by an enlarged pubic vein that terminates into the external iliac vein (EIV) forming a venous corona mortis. These variant OVs are liable to injury during surgical interventions near the pubic bone. The present study aimed to report the prevalence of variant as well as duplicated OVs in Indian cadavers. Methodology: The present descriptive study included 25 adult human cadavers and 11 hemi-pelves. The specimens with variant OVs were identified and followed to their termination into the internal or external iliac system. The external diameter of variant OVs and their distance from the symphysis pubis were recorded. Results: Variant OVs were observed in 34.42%. Most of the variant veins crossed over the pubic ramus. In 21.31%, duplicated OVs were observed, which drained separately into the internal iliac as well as the EIV, or the IIV as a common trunk. The average diameter of the variant OVs on the superior pubic ramus was 4.12 ± 1.2 mm. The average distance between the pubic symphysis and the variant OVs on the superior pubic ramus was 45.28 ± 7.65 mm. Conclusion: The present study appreciates the variant anatomy of the OV and its relation to the superior pubic ramus. Understanding these variations will help avoid the risk of injury and hemorrhage in pelvis surgeries as well as endoscopic procedures.","PeriodicalId":52750,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy","volume":"218 1","pages":"134 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obturator vein and its anatomical variations in cadavers: A descriptive study\",\"authors\":\"S. Sakthivel, K. Sarala Devi, Suman Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_70_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The obturator vein (OV) is formed in the proximal adductor region and traverses through the obturator foramen to terminate in the internal iliac vein (IIV). It is occasionally replaced by an enlarged pubic vein that terminates into the external iliac vein (EIV) forming a venous corona mortis. These variant OVs are liable to injury during surgical interventions near the pubic bone. The present study aimed to report the prevalence of variant as well as duplicated OVs in Indian cadavers. Methodology: The present descriptive study included 25 adult human cadavers and 11 hemi-pelves. The specimens with variant OVs were identified and followed to their termination into the internal or external iliac system. The external diameter of variant OVs and their distance from the symphysis pubis were recorded. Results: Variant OVs were observed in 34.42%. Most of the variant veins crossed over the pubic ramus. In 21.31%, duplicated OVs were observed, which drained separately into the internal iliac as well as the EIV, or the IIV as a common trunk. The average diameter of the variant OVs on the superior pubic ramus was 4.12 ± 1.2 mm. The average distance between the pubic symphysis and the variant OVs on the superior pubic ramus was 45.28 ± 7.65 mm. Conclusion: The present study appreciates the variant anatomy of the OV and its relation to the superior pubic ramus. Understanding these variations will help avoid the risk of injury and hemorrhage in pelvis surgeries as well as endoscopic procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy\",\"volume\":\"218 1\",\"pages\":\"134 - 137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_70_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_70_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:闭孔静脉(OV)形成于内收肌近端区域,穿过闭孔后最终汇入髂内静脉(IIV)。它偶尔会被一条扩大的耻骨静脉所取代,耻骨静脉最终汇入髂外静脉(EIV),形成静脉冠。在耻骨附近进行外科手术时,这些变异的耻骨外静脉很容易受到损伤。本研究旨在报告印度尸体中变异和重复 OV 的发生率。研究方法:本描述性研究包括 25 具成人尸体和 11 具半人尸体。对具有变异外髂骨的标本进行了鉴定,并追踪其终点至髂内或髂外系统。记录了变异外髂骨的外径及其与耻骨联合的距离。结果:34.42%的变异髂外静脉被观察到。大多数变异静脉穿过耻骨横突。有 21.31% 的变异外静脉是重复的,它们分别排入髂内静脉和髂外静脉,或以髂内静脉为共同主干。耻骨上横梁上的变异 OV 平均直径为 4.12 ± 1.2 毫米。耻骨联合与耻骨上横突上的变异OV之间的平均距离为(45.28 ± 7.65)毫米。结论本研究了解了变异的耻骨联合解剖结构及其与耻骨上横突的关系。了解这些变异有助于避免骨盆手术和内窥镜手术中的损伤和出血风险。
Obturator vein and its anatomical variations in cadavers: A descriptive study
Background: The obturator vein (OV) is formed in the proximal adductor region and traverses through the obturator foramen to terminate in the internal iliac vein (IIV). It is occasionally replaced by an enlarged pubic vein that terminates into the external iliac vein (EIV) forming a venous corona mortis. These variant OVs are liable to injury during surgical interventions near the pubic bone. The present study aimed to report the prevalence of variant as well as duplicated OVs in Indian cadavers. Methodology: The present descriptive study included 25 adult human cadavers and 11 hemi-pelves. The specimens with variant OVs were identified and followed to their termination into the internal or external iliac system. The external diameter of variant OVs and their distance from the symphysis pubis were recorded. Results: Variant OVs were observed in 34.42%. Most of the variant veins crossed over the pubic ramus. In 21.31%, duplicated OVs were observed, which drained separately into the internal iliac as well as the EIV, or the IIV as a common trunk. The average diameter of the variant OVs on the superior pubic ramus was 4.12 ± 1.2 mm. The average distance between the pubic symphysis and the variant OVs on the superior pubic ramus was 45.28 ± 7.65 mm. Conclusion: The present study appreciates the variant anatomy of the OV and its relation to the superior pubic ramus. Understanding these variations will help avoid the risk of injury and hemorrhage in pelvis surgeries as well as endoscopic procedures.