使用不同正畸托槽材料、蚀刻剂和粘合剂系统后的釉质脱矿评估:体外研究

Rahaf Zawawi, Naif A. Almosa
{"title":"使用不同正畸托槽材料、蚀刻剂和粘合剂系统后的釉质脱矿评估:体外研究","authors":"Rahaf Zawawi, Naif A. Almosa","doi":"10.1166/jbt.2023.3322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to assess enamel demineralization depth following the use of different bracket materials, etchants, and adhesive systems. Ninety-nine extracted human premolars were assigned to nine groups (eight experimental and one control), each including 11 specimens. The experimental groups were bonded to either metal or ceramic brackets and prepared using a total-or self-etchant with a pre-coated or flash-free adhesive system. All specimens were immersed in an artificial demineralization solution for 7 days at pH 4.5 and 37 °C. The brackets were debonded, and the specimens were sectioned buccolingually at the right and left sides of the bracket base margins. Scanning electron microscopy was used to assess the demineralization depth using ImageJ software. Significantly deeper enamel demineralization was observed in all bonded teeth compared to non-bonded teeth (p < 0.001). The adhesive system had no significant effect on the demineralization depth. Metal brackets caused significantly deeper enamel demineralization than ceramic brackets (p <0.005). The use of the total-etch surface treatment caused deeper demineralization compared to that of the self-etch treatment. In conclusion, bonded teeth exhibit deeper enamel demineralization than non-bonded teeth. Metal brackets contribute to deeper demineralization than ceramic brackets. The total-etch surface treatment caused deeper demineralization than self-etch when combined with metal brackets and a pre-coated adhesive system.","PeriodicalId":15300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Enamel Demineralization Following the Use of Different Orthodontic Bracket Materials, Etchants, and Adhesive Systems: An In Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Rahaf Zawawi, Naif A. Almosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1166/jbt.2023.3322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to assess enamel demineralization depth following the use of different bracket materials, etchants, and adhesive systems. Ninety-nine extracted human premolars were assigned to nine groups (eight experimental and one control), each including 11 specimens. The experimental groups were bonded to either metal or ceramic brackets and prepared using a total-or self-etchant with a pre-coated or flash-free adhesive system. All specimens were immersed in an artificial demineralization solution for 7 days at pH 4.5 and 37 °C. The brackets were debonded, and the specimens were sectioned buccolingually at the right and left sides of the bracket base margins. Scanning electron microscopy was used to assess the demineralization depth using ImageJ software. Significantly deeper enamel demineralization was observed in all bonded teeth compared to non-bonded teeth (p < 0.001). The adhesive system had no significant effect on the demineralization depth. Metal brackets caused significantly deeper enamel demineralization than ceramic brackets (p <0.005). The use of the total-etch surface treatment caused deeper demineralization compared to that of the self-etch treatment. In conclusion, bonded teeth exhibit deeper enamel demineralization than non-bonded teeth. Metal brackets contribute to deeper demineralization than ceramic brackets. The total-etch surface treatment caused deeper demineralization than self-etch when combined with metal brackets and a pre-coated adhesive system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1166/jbt.2023.3322\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1166/jbt.2023.3322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估使用不同托槽材料、蚀刻剂和粘接剂系统后牙釉质脱矿的深度。将拔出的 99 颗人类前臼齿分成九组(八组实验组和一组对照组),每组包括 11 个标本。实验组粘接金属或陶瓷托槽,并使用全蚀剂或自蚀剂以及预涂或免闪光粘接剂系统进行制备。所有试样都在 pH 值为 4.5、温度为 37 °C 的人工脱矿溶液中浸泡 7 天。脱开托槽,在托槽基底边缘的左右两侧对试样进行颊舌侧切片。使用 ImageJ 软件扫描电子显微镜评估脱矿深度。与非粘接牙齿相比,所有粘接牙齿的釉质脱矿深度都明显加深(p < 0.001)。粘接系统对脱矿深度没有明显影响。金属支架造成的牙釉质脱矿深度明显高于陶瓷支架(p <0.005)。与自酸蚀处理相比,使用全酸蚀处理表面会导致更深的脱矿。总之,粘结牙齿比非粘结牙齿的牙釉质脱矿程度更深。与陶瓷托槽相比,金属托槽导致的脱矿化程度更深。当与金属托槽和预涂粘合剂系统结合使用时,全蚀刻表面处理比自蚀刻造成的脱矿更深。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Enamel Demineralization Following the Use of Different Orthodontic Bracket Materials, Etchants, and Adhesive Systems: An In Vitro Study
The aim of this study was to assess enamel demineralization depth following the use of different bracket materials, etchants, and adhesive systems. Ninety-nine extracted human premolars were assigned to nine groups (eight experimental and one control), each including 11 specimens. The experimental groups were bonded to either metal or ceramic brackets and prepared using a total-or self-etchant with a pre-coated or flash-free adhesive system. All specimens were immersed in an artificial demineralization solution for 7 days at pH 4.5 and 37 °C. The brackets were debonded, and the specimens were sectioned buccolingually at the right and left sides of the bracket base margins. Scanning electron microscopy was used to assess the demineralization depth using ImageJ software. Significantly deeper enamel demineralization was observed in all bonded teeth compared to non-bonded teeth (p < 0.001). The adhesive system had no significant effect on the demineralization depth. Metal brackets caused significantly deeper enamel demineralization than ceramic brackets (p <0.005). The use of the total-etch surface treatment caused deeper demineralization compared to that of the self-etch treatment. In conclusion, bonded teeth exhibit deeper enamel demineralization than non-bonded teeth. Metal brackets contribute to deeper demineralization than ceramic brackets. The total-etch surface treatment caused deeper demineralization than self-etch when combined with metal brackets and a pre-coated adhesive system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
332
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Occupational stress in clinical and non-clinical staff in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS): a cross-sectional study. The Real-Time Detection of Mouse Double Minute-2 mRNA Expression in Living Cells with the Gold Nanoparticle (Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Vol. 8(1), pp. 27–34 (2018)) The Predictive Value of Conventional Ultrasound Signs Plus Serological Indices for Neck Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Cancer Significant Effect of Ritodrine Hydrochloride Combined with Magnesium Sulfate for Treatment of Patients with Premature Rupture of Membranes Application and Potential of Nanobiomaterials in Bone Regeneration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1