阿尔西普隆和西奥菲拉克特-西莫卡塔的书信

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Bulletin of the John Rylands Library Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.7227/bjrl.99.1.4
Anna Tiziana Drago
{"title":"阿尔西普隆和西奥菲拉克特-西莫卡塔的书信","authors":"Anna Tiziana Drago","doi":"10.7227/bjrl.99.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I analyse the manuscript sources used by Marcus Musurus for the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, examining in both cases the organisation of the letters, the reasons for what may be disturbances in their order, the possible Druckvorlage, and the variants in the Aldine edition traceable to attempts by Musurus to improve the text. Although it is quite difficult to recover the original shape of the works of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, the modern reader still confronts numerous questions: did the Aldine editor combine and reorganise letters found in different manuscripts, or did he reproduce one or more manuscripts that contained precisely these letters and in this particular order? How does the editio princeps differ from modern editions in the organisation of the two authors’ letters? And how does this organisation affect how we interpret the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta today?","PeriodicalId":43675,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the John Rylands Library","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta\",\"authors\":\"Anna Tiziana Drago\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/bjrl.99.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I analyse the manuscript sources used by Marcus Musurus for the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, examining in both cases the organisation of the letters, the reasons for what may be disturbances in their order, the possible Druckvorlage, and the variants in the Aldine edition traceable to attempts by Musurus to improve the text. Although it is quite difficult to recover the original shape of the works of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, the modern reader still confronts numerous questions: did the Aldine editor combine and reorganise letters found in different manuscripts, or did he reproduce one or more manuscripts that contained precisely these letters and in this particular order? How does the editio princeps differ from modern editions in the organisation of the two authors’ letters? And how does this organisation affect how we interpret the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta today?\",\"PeriodicalId\":43675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the John Rylands Library\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the John Rylands Library\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.99.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the John Rylands Library","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.99.1.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我分析了马库斯-穆苏鲁斯为阿尔西普隆和西奥菲拉克特-西莫卡塔的书信所使用的手稿资料,研究了这两份书信的组织结构、书信顺序可能被打乱的原因、可能的Druckvorlage,以及阿尔丁版本中可追溯到穆苏鲁斯试图改进文本的变体。虽然要恢复阿尔西普隆和西摩卡塔 Theophylact Simocatta 作品的原貌相当困难,但现代读者仍然面临着许多问题:阿尔丁版本的编辑是将不同手稿中的信件进行了合并和重组,还是复制了一份或多份手稿,而这些手稿正是包含这些信件并按照特定顺序排列的?在组织两位作者的信件方面,editio princeps 与现代版本有何不同?这种编排方式对我们今天如何解读阿尔西普隆和西奥菲拉克特-西莫卡塔的书信有何影响?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta
In this article, I analyse the manuscript sources used by Marcus Musurus for the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, examining in both cases the organisation of the letters, the reasons for what may be disturbances in their order, the possible Druckvorlage, and the variants in the Aldine edition traceable to attempts by Musurus to improve the text. Although it is quite difficult to recover the original shape of the works of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, the modern reader still confronts numerous questions: did the Aldine editor combine and reorganise letters found in different manuscripts, or did he reproduce one or more manuscripts that contained precisely these letters and in this particular order? How does the editio princeps differ from modern editions in the organisation of the two authors’ letters? And how does this organisation affect how we interpret the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta today?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the John Rylands Library
Bulletin of the John Rylands Library HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sinful, Sexual, Sacred: Locating a Thirteenth-Century Visuality through the Selective Erasures in Rylands MS French 5 Abbess, Judge, Jailor: Authority and Imprisonment at Holy Trinity, Caen Lorenzo Opimo of Bologna, Teaching Doctor of the Servites during the Reformation, and His Sentences Lectures at the University of Paris in 1370–71 (Part II) Machiavelli and the Florentine Book Trade French and English Texts of the Laws of Oléron: Assessing Proximity between Copies and Editions by Means of Cosine Similarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1