{"title":"阿尔西普隆和西奥菲拉克特-西莫卡塔的书信","authors":"Anna Tiziana Drago","doi":"10.7227/bjrl.99.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I analyse the manuscript sources used by Marcus Musurus for the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, examining in both cases the organisation of the letters, the reasons for what may be disturbances in their order, the possible Druckvorlage, and the variants in the Aldine edition traceable to attempts by Musurus to improve the text. Although it is quite difficult to recover the original shape of the works of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, the modern reader still confronts numerous questions: did the Aldine editor combine and reorganise letters found in different manuscripts, or did he reproduce one or more manuscripts that contained precisely these letters and in this particular order? How does the editio princeps differ from modern editions in the organisation of the two authors’ letters? And how does this organisation affect how we interpret the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta today?","PeriodicalId":43675,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the John Rylands Library","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta\",\"authors\":\"Anna Tiziana Drago\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/bjrl.99.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I analyse the manuscript sources used by Marcus Musurus for the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, examining in both cases the organisation of the letters, the reasons for what may be disturbances in their order, the possible Druckvorlage, and the variants in the Aldine edition traceable to attempts by Musurus to improve the text. Although it is quite difficult to recover the original shape of the works of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, the modern reader still confronts numerous questions: did the Aldine editor combine and reorganise letters found in different manuscripts, or did he reproduce one or more manuscripts that contained precisely these letters and in this particular order? How does the editio princeps differ from modern editions in the organisation of the two authors’ letters? And how does this organisation affect how we interpret the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta today?\",\"PeriodicalId\":43675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the John Rylands Library\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the John Rylands Library\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.99.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the John Rylands Library","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.99.1.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇文章中,我分析了马库斯-穆苏鲁斯为阿尔西普隆和西奥菲拉克特-西莫卡塔的书信所使用的手稿资料,研究了这两份书信的组织结构、书信顺序可能被打乱的原因、可能的Druckvorlage,以及阿尔丁版本中可追溯到穆苏鲁斯试图改进文本的变体。虽然要恢复阿尔西普隆和西摩卡塔 Theophylact Simocatta 作品的原貌相当困难,但现代读者仍然面临着许多问题:阿尔丁版本的编辑是将不同手稿中的信件进行了合并和重组,还是复制了一份或多份手稿,而这些手稿正是包含这些信件并按照特定顺序排列的?在组织两位作者的信件方面,editio princeps 与现代版本有何不同?这种编排方式对我们今天如何解读阿尔西普隆和西奥菲拉克特-西莫卡塔的书信有何影响?
The Letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta
In this article, I analyse the manuscript sources used by Marcus Musurus for the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, examining in both cases the organisation of the letters, the reasons for what may be disturbances in their order, the possible Druckvorlage, and the variants in the Aldine edition traceable to attempts by Musurus to improve the text. Although it is quite difficult to recover the original shape of the works of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta, the modern reader still confronts numerous questions: did the Aldine editor combine and reorganise letters found in different manuscripts, or did he reproduce one or more manuscripts that contained precisely these letters and in this particular order? How does the editio princeps differ from modern editions in the organisation of the two authors’ letters? And how does this organisation affect how we interpret the letters of Alciphron and Theophylact Simocatta today?