在空间外部性条件下开展自愿合作以降低集体风险

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1016/j.socec.2024.102162
Yohei Mitani, Naoya Yukizaki
{"title":"在空间外部性条件下开展自愿合作以降低集体风险","authors":"Yohei Mitani,&nbsp;Naoya Yukizaki","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Promoting public cooperation has become a challenge for authorities in the pandemic era. We develop a novel <em>risk mitigation game</em> laboratory experiment that explores the coordination and voluntary cooperation problems under spatial risk externalities, where the effect of an agent's effort depends on the spatially weighted efforts of all local and global members. We show that tax-like centralized interventions are effective in improving collective-risk mitigation, social welfare, and equality among members. Then, our result illustrates that the effectiveness of revealing information about others’ behavior on risk mitigation depends on intervention degrees and whether mitigation choices are strategic complements or substitutes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voluntary cooperation for mitigating collective-risk under spatial externalities\",\"authors\":\"Yohei Mitani,&nbsp;Naoya Yukizaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Promoting public cooperation has become a challenge for authorities in the pandemic era. We develop a novel <em>risk mitigation game</em> laboratory experiment that explores the coordination and voluntary cooperation problems under spatial risk externalities, where the effect of an agent's effort depends on the spatially weighted efforts of all local and global members. We show that tax-like centralized interventions are effective in improving collective-risk mitigation, social welfare, and equality among members. Then, our result illustrates that the effectiveness of revealing information about others’ behavior on risk mitigation depends on intervention degrees and whether mitigation choices are strategic complements or substitutes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在大流行病时代,促进公众合作已成为当局面临的一项挑战。我们开发了一个新颖的风险缓解博弈实验室实验,探讨了空间风险外部性下的协调和自愿合作问题,在这种情况下,代理人的努力效果取决于所有本地和全球成员的空间加权努力。我们的研究表明,类似税收的集中干预能有效改善集体风险缓解、社会福利和成员间的平等。然后,我们的结果说明,揭示他人行为信息对风险缓解的有效性取决于干预程度,以及缓解选择是战略互补还是战略替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Voluntary cooperation for mitigating collective-risk under spatial externalities

Promoting public cooperation has become a challenge for authorities in the pandemic era. We develop a novel risk mitigation game laboratory experiment that explores the coordination and voluntary cooperation problems under spatial risk externalities, where the effect of an agent's effort depends on the spatially weighted efforts of all local and global members. We show that tax-like centralized interventions are effective in improving collective-risk mitigation, social welfare, and equality among members. Then, our result illustrates that the effectiveness of revealing information about others’ behavior on risk mitigation depends on intervention degrees and whether mitigation choices are strategic complements or substitutes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
期刊最新文献
The drunk side of trust: Generalized and instantaneous trust at gathering events Adam Smith, human betterment, and his erroneous indentification with self-interested human action Future time reference and risk aversion Trust a few: Natural disasters and the disruption of trust in Africa Coordination in stag hunt games
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1