{"title":"伯罗奔尼撒战争的起源》第四章与斯巴达历史研究的发展","authors":"Stephen Hodkinson","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the impact on Spartan historiography of Chapter <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">IV</span> of de Ste. Croix’s <em>Origins of the Peloponnesian War</em>, focusing on his discussions of Spartan politics and society in Sections v–vi. These sections fit oddly within the overall chapter, but they blew a breath of fresh air into Spartan studies through their revisionist approach, intimations of the socio-economic bases of policy-making, and extended accounts of ‘real-life’ political episodes across the classical period. Along with Moses Finley’s near-contemporary article on Sparta, <em><span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">OPW</span></em> significantly influenced the following generation of British historians (including the author), although they often adopted different interpretations or developed new perspectives on Spartan society only hinted at by de Ste. Croix. <em><span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">OPW</span></em> also had an important impact on Western European historiography on Spartan politics. Its combination of constitutional and societal approaches gives it an enduring currency in the context of developing Historical Institutionalist approaches to political studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Origins of the Peloponnesian War, Chapter IV, and the Development of Spartan Historical Studies\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Hodkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/20512996-12340431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article examines the impact on Spartan historiography of Chapter <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">IV</span> of de Ste. Croix’s <em>Origins of the Peloponnesian War</em>, focusing on his discussions of Spartan politics and society in Sections v–vi. These sections fit oddly within the overall chapter, but they blew a breath of fresh air into Spartan studies through their revisionist approach, intimations of the socio-economic bases of policy-making, and extended accounts of ‘real-life’ political episodes across the classical period. Along with Moses Finley’s near-contemporary article on Sparta, <em><span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">OPW</span></em> significantly influenced the following generation of British historians (including the author), although they often adopted different interpretations or developed new perspectives on Spartan society only hinted at by de Ste. Croix. <em><span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">OPW</span></em> also had an important impact on Western European historiography on Spartan politics. Its combination of constitutional and societal approaches gives it an enduring currency in the context of developing Historical Institutionalist approaches to political studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POLIS\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POLIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340431\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340431","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文探讨了 de Ste. Croix 的《伯罗奔尼撒战争的起源》第四章对斯巴达史学的影响,重点关注他在第五至第六节中对斯巴达政治和社会的讨论。这几节在全章中的位置很奇怪,但它们通过修正主义的方法、对决策的社会经济基础的暗示以及对整个古典时期 "真实 "政治事件的扩展叙述,为斯巴达研究吹进了一股新鲜空气。与摩西-芬利(Moses Finley)几乎同时发表的关于斯巴达的文章一起,《斯巴达历史研究》对下一代英国历史学家(包括作者)产生了重大影响,尽管他们经常采用不同的解释,或对斯巴达社会提出新的观点,而这些观点只有 de Ste.OPW 对西欧有关斯巴达政治的史学研究也产生了重要影响。它结合了宪法和社会的研究方法,使其在发展历史制度主义政治研究方法的背景下经久不衰。
The Origins of the Peloponnesian War, Chapter IV, and the Development of Spartan Historical Studies
This article examines the impact on Spartan historiography of Chapter IV of de Ste. Croix’s Origins of the Peloponnesian War, focusing on his discussions of Spartan politics and society in Sections v–vi. These sections fit oddly within the overall chapter, but they blew a breath of fresh air into Spartan studies through their revisionist approach, intimations of the socio-economic bases of policy-making, and extended accounts of ‘real-life’ political episodes across the classical period. Along with Moses Finley’s near-contemporary article on Sparta, OPW significantly influenced the following generation of British historians (including the author), although they often adopted different interpretations or developed new perspectives on Spartan society only hinted at by de Ste. Croix. OPW also had an important impact on Western European historiography on Spartan politics. Its combination of constitutional and societal approaches gives it an enduring currency in the context of developing Historical Institutionalist approaches to political studies.