{"title":"法夫纳和莱茵女仆的宝藏,五十年后的今天","authors":"David Lewis","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article discusses G.E.M. de Ste. Croix’s contentions about the effect of Helotage on Spartan foreign policy articulated in chapter <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">IV</span> of <em>Origins of the Peloponnesian War</em>, namely that Sparta’s Helot population was uniquely dangerous, constraining Sparta’s ability to send large numbers of citizen hoplites abroad lest it be exposed to the threat within. It shows that while certain arguments advanced by Ste. Croix are no longer tenable in light of subsequent research, others still stand up to critical scrutiny fifty years on; furthermore, other points neglected by Ste. Croix reinforce his overall claims.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fafner and the Rhinemaidens’ Treasure, Fifty Years On\",\"authors\":\"David Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/20512996-12340430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article discusses G.E.M. de Ste. Croix’s contentions about the effect of Helotage on Spartan foreign policy articulated in chapter <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">IV</span> of <em>Origins of the Peloponnesian War</em>, namely that Sparta’s Helot population was uniquely dangerous, constraining Sparta’s ability to send large numbers of citizen hoplites abroad lest it be exposed to the threat within. It shows that while certain arguments advanced by Ste. Croix are no longer tenable in light of subsequent research, others still stand up to critical scrutiny fifty years on; furthermore, other points neglected by Ste. Croix reinforce his overall claims.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POLIS\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POLIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340430\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文讨论了 G.E.M. de Ste. Croix 在《伯罗奔尼撒战争的起源》一书第四章中阐述的关于赫洛特人对斯巴达外交政策的影响的论点,即斯巴达的赫洛特人具有独特的危险性,限制了斯巴达向国外派遣大量公民霍普利特人的能力,以免暴露在国内的威胁之下。这表明,尽管根据后来的研究,斯蒂-克鲁瓦提出的某些论点已不再站得住脚,但其他论点在五十年后的今天仍然经得起批判性的审视;此外,斯蒂-克鲁瓦忽略的其他观点也加强了他的总体主张。
Fafner and the Rhinemaidens’ Treasure, Fifty Years On
This article discusses G.E.M. de Ste. Croix’s contentions about the effect of Helotage on Spartan foreign policy articulated in chapter IV of Origins of the Peloponnesian War, namely that Sparta’s Helot population was uniquely dangerous, constraining Sparta’s ability to send large numbers of citizen hoplites abroad lest it be exposed to the threat within. It shows that while certain arguments advanced by Ste. Croix are no longer tenable in light of subsequent research, others still stand up to critical scrutiny fifty years on; furthermore, other points neglected by Ste. Croix reinforce his overall claims.