法夫纳和莱茵女仆的宝藏,五十年后的今天

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS POLIS Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1163/20512996-12340430
David Lewis
{"title":"法夫纳和莱茵女仆的宝藏,五十年后的今天","authors":"David Lewis","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article discusses G.E.M. de Ste. Croix’s contentions about the effect of Helotage on Spartan foreign policy articulated in chapter <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">IV</span> of <em>Origins of the Peloponnesian War</em>, namely that Sparta’s Helot population was uniquely dangerous, constraining Sparta’s ability to send large numbers of citizen hoplites abroad lest it be exposed to the threat within. It shows that while certain arguments advanced by Ste. Croix are no longer tenable in light of subsequent research, others still stand up to critical scrutiny fifty years on; furthermore, other points neglected by Ste. Croix reinforce his overall claims.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fafner and the Rhinemaidens’ Treasure, Fifty Years On\",\"authors\":\"David Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/20512996-12340430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article discusses G.E.M. de Ste. Croix’s contentions about the effect of Helotage on Spartan foreign policy articulated in chapter <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">IV</span> of <em>Origins of the Peloponnesian War</em>, namely that Sparta’s Helot population was uniquely dangerous, constraining Sparta’s ability to send large numbers of citizen hoplites abroad lest it be exposed to the threat within. It shows that while certain arguments advanced by Ste. Croix are no longer tenable in light of subsequent research, others still stand up to critical scrutiny fifty years on; furthermore, other points neglected by Ste. Croix reinforce his overall claims.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POLIS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POLIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340430\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了 G.E.M. de Ste. Croix 在《伯罗奔尼撒战争的起源》一书第四章中阐述的关于赫洛特人对斯巴达外交政策的影响的论点,即斯巴达的赫洛特人具有独特的危险性,限制了斯巴达向国外派遣大量公民霍普利特人的能力,以免暴露在国内的威胁之下。这表明,尽管根据后来的研究,斯蒂-克鲁瓦提出的某些论点已不再站得住脚,但其他论点在五十年后的今天仍然经得起批判性的审视;此外,斯蒂-克鲁瓦忽略的其他观点也加强了他的总体主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fafner and the Rhinemaidens’ Treasure, Fifty Years On

This article discusses G.E.M. de Ste. Croix’s contentions about the effect of Helotage on Spartan foreign policy articulated in chapter IV of Origins of the Peloponnesian War, namely that Sparta’s Helot population was uniquely dangerous, constraining Sparta’s ability to send large numbers of citizen hoplites abroad lest it be exposed to the threat within. It shows that while certain arguments advanced by Ste. Croix are no longer tenable in light of subsequent research, others still stand up to critical scrutiny fifty years on; furthermore, other points neglected by Ste. Croix reinforce his overall claims.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
POLIS
POLIS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Concept of Partnership in Book II of the Republic Socratic Contempt for Wealth in Plato’s Republic Praxis as Property: the Concept of Justice in Plato’s Republic Political Performativity in Performance Culture: Xenophon’s Hipparchikos and the Dithyrambic Chorus The King’s House or the Tyrant’s Palace? Rethinking Persia in Herodotus’s History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1