体重指数与最近进食的外显记忆、用心进食和认知分心之间的关系:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-04 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.728
Elanor C Hinton, Victoria Beesley, Sam D Leary, Danielle Ferriday
{"title":"体重指数与最近进食的外显记忆、用心进食和认知分心之间的关系:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Elanor C Hinton, Victoria Beesley, Sam D Leary, Danielle Ferriday","doi":"10.1002/osp4.728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Eating while distracted has been associated with a higher body mass index (BMI), whereas mindful eating and episodic memory for recent eating have shown the opposite pattern. This pre-registered, global study (https://osf.io/rdjzk) compared the relative association between these variables (and four \"positive controls\": restraint, disinhibition, emotional eating, plate clearing) and self-reported BMI. The timing of data collection (April-May 2020) during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic enabled an investigation of the impact of stay-at-home restrictions imposed on the UK population on the measures of eating behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was completed, including: (i) demographic data (e.g., self-reported BMI), (ii) Likert ratings assessing episodic memory for recent eating, mindful eating, cognitive distraction, restrained eating, emotional eating, disinhibition and plate clearing over the last 12 months and the last 7 days (during the first UK COVID-19 lockdown), and (iii) the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A large adult sample participated (<i>N</i> = 846; mean (SD) age = 33.0 (14.3) years; mean (SD) BMI = 24.6 (5.6) kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Mindful eating (MEQ-total score) was associated with a lower self-reported BMI (<i>β</i> = -0.12; 95% CI = -0.20, -0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.004), whereas disinhibited eating was associated with a higher self-reported BMI (<i>β</i> = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.21, 0.38; <i>p</i> < 0.001). In UK participants (<i>n</i> = 520), consistent changes in eating behavior during lockdown were not found. For those that did experience change, decreases were reported in; emotional eating, disinhibited eating, focusing on taste during a meal (a measure of mindful eating), and using a smart phone while eating.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide evidence in a large global sample for associations between BMI and (i) mindful eating, and (ii) disinhibited eating. Future research should evaluate whether mindful eating demonstrates a prospective association with body weight and should consider mechanisms of action.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"e728"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10768738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between body mass index and episodic memory for recent eating, mindful eating, and cognitive distraction: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Elanor C Hinton, Victoria Beesley, Sam D Leary, Danielle Ferriday\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/osp4.728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Eating while distracted has been associated with a higher body mass index (BMI), whereas mindful eating and episodic memory for recent eating have shown the opposite pattern. This pre-registered, global study (https://osf.io/rdjzk) compared the relative association between these variables (and four \\\"positive controls\\\": restraint, disinhibition, emotional eating, plate clearing) and self-reported BMI. The timing of data collection (April-May 2020) during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic enabled an investigation of the impact of stay-at-home restrictions imposed on the UK population on the measures of eating behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was completed, including: (i) demographic data (e.g., self-reported BMI), (ii) Likert ratings assessing episodic memory for recent eating, mindful eating, cognitive distraction, restrained eating, emotional eating, disinhibition and plate clearing over the last 12 months and the last 7 days (during the first UK COVID-19 lockdown), and (iii) the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A large adult sample participated (<i>N</i> = 846; mean (SD) age = 33.0 (14.3) years; mean (SD) BMI = 24.6 (5.6) kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Mindful eating (MEQ-total score) was associated with a lower self-reported BMI (<i>β</i> = -0.12; 95% CI = -0.20, -0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.004), whereas disinhibited eating was associated with a higher self-reported BMI (<i>β</i> = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.21, 0.38; <i>p</i> < 0.001). In UK participants (<i>n</i> = 520), consistent changes in eating behavior during lockdown were not found. For those that did experience change, decreases were reported in; emotional eating, disinhibited eating, focusing on taste during a meal (a measure of mindful eating), and using a smart phone while eating.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide evidence in a large global sample for associations between BMI and (i) mindful eating, and (ii) disinhibited eating. Future research should evaluate whether mindful eating demonstrates a prospective association with body weight and should consider mechanisms of action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"e728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10768738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.728\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:注意力分散时进食与体重指数(BMI)升高有关,而用心进食和对近期进食的外显记忆则显示出相反的模式。这项预先注册的全球性研究(https://osf.io/rdjzk)比较了这些变量(以及四种 "积极对照":克制、抑制、情绪化进食和清盘)与自我报告的体重指数之间的相对关联。数据收集的时间(2020 年 4 月至 5 月)正值 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,因此可以调查英国人在家限制饮食对饮食行为测量的影响:完成了一项在线调查,内容包括:(i) 人口统计学数据(如自我报告的体重指数);(ii) 对过去 12 个月和过去 7 天(英国 COVID-19 第一次封锁期间)最近进食的历时记忆、正念进食、认知分心、克制进食、情绪化进食、抑制和清盘进行评估的李克特评分;(iii) 正念进食问卷 (MEQ):大量成人样本参与了调查(N = 846;平均(标清)年龄 = 33.0 (14.3) 岁;平均(标清)体重指数 = 24.6 (5.6) kg/m2)。注意饮食(MEQ-总分)与自我报告的体重指数较低有关(β = -0.12;95% CI = -0.20,-0.04;p = 0.004),而抑制性饮食与自我报告的体重指数较高有关(β = 0.30;95% CI = 0.21,0.38;p n = 520),但在封锁期间未发现饮食行为的一致变化。对于那些确实发生了变化的人,据报告在以下方面有所减少:情绪化进食、抑制性进食、进餐时专注于味道(用心进食的一种测量方法)以及进食时使用智能手机:这些研究结果在一个大型全球样本中证明了体重指数(BMI)与(i)正念进食和(ii)抑制性进食之间的联系。未来的研究应评估正念进食是否与体重有前瞻性关联,并应考虑其作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations between body mass index and episodic memory for recent eating, mindful eating, and cognitive distraction: A cross-sectional study.

Objectives: Eating while distracted has been associated with a higher body mass index (BMI), whereas mindful eating and episodic memory for recent eating have shown the opposite pattern. This pre-registered, global study (https://osf.io/rdjzk) compared the relative association between these variables (and four "positive controls": restraint, disinhibition, emotional eating, plate clearing) and self-reported BMI. The timing of data collection (April-May 2020) during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic enabled an investigation of the impact of stay-at-home restrictions imposed on the UK population on the measures of eating behavior.

Methods: An online survey was completed, including: (i) demographic data (e.g., self-reported BMI), (ii) Likert ratings assessing episodic memory for recent eating, mindful eating, cognitive distraction, restrained eating, emotional eating, disinhibition and plate clearing over the last 12 months and the last 7 days (during the first UK COVID-19 lockdown), and (iii) the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ).

Results: A large adult sample participated (N = 846; mean (SD) age = 33.0 (14.3) years; mean (SD) BMI = 24.6 (5.6) kg/m2). Mindful eating (MEQ-total score) was associated with a lower self-reported BMI (β = -0.12; 95% CI = -0.20, -0.04; p = 0.004), whereas disinhibited eating was associated with a higher self-reported BMI (β = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.21, 0.38; p < 0.001). In UK participants (n = 520), consistent changes in eating behavior during lockdown were not found. For those that did experience change, decreases were reported in; emotional eating, disinhibited eating, focusing on taste during a meal (a measure of mindful eating), and using a smart phone while eating.

Conclusions: These findings provide evidence in a large global sample for associations between BMI and (i) mindful eating, and (ii) disinhibited eating. Future research should evaluate whether mindful eating demonstrates a prospective association with body weight and should consider mechanisms of action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Behavioral weight loss interventions in college health centers: A qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators to implementation. A Novel and Comprehensive Wellness Assessment for Lifestyle-Based Interventions. Results of a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial using counseling to augment a digital weight loss program. Predictors of ongoing attendance at an Australian publicly funded specialist obesity service. The impact of weight self-stigma on weight-loss treatment engagement and outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1