用 CPDA-1 抗凝剂对用于储存红细胞的 DINCH 塑化血袋进行体外评估

Hyungsuk Kim, Kyunghoon Lee, Soo Hyun Seo, Y. J. Hong, Sang Mee Hwang, Jeong Su Park, Kyoung Un Park, Junghan Song
{"title":"用 CPDA-1 抗凝剂对用于储存红细胞的 DINCH 塑化血袋进行体外评估","authors":"Hyungsuk Kim, Kyunghoon Lee, Soo Hyun Seo, Y. J. Hong, Sang Mee Hwang, Jeong Su Park, Kyoung Un Park, Junghan Song","doi":"10.1159/000535625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is a plasticizer commonly used in blood bags. Despite its protective effects on red blood cell (RBC) storage, concerns about its reproductive toxicity exist. This study investigated the in vitro quality of RBC concentrates stored in bags using di(isononyl) cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH) as an alternative plasticizer. Methods: Using a pool-and-split study design, we produced 20 matched homogenous quintets of RBC concentrates in two DINCH bags and three DEHP bags with citrate phosphate dextrose adenine (CPDA-1) anticoagulant. RBC storage quality was assessed weekly for 35 days. Results: On day 35, the median hemolysis levels in the DINCH bags (0.297–0.342%) were marginally higher (p < 0.05) than the DEHP bags (0.204–0.240%). All DINCH bags showed <0.8% hemolysis. RBCs in the DINCH bags showed increased mean corpuscular volume and decreased eosin 5′ maleimide binding than in the DEHP bags. Higher pO2 and lower pCO2 levels in the DINCH bags indicated better gas permeability than in DEHP bags. Other metabolic parameters were comparable in both bags. Compared to DEHP, DINCH exhibited considerably lower levels of plasticizer leaching into blood bags. Conclusion: The quality of RBC concentrates stored for 35 days in DINCH-plasticized blood bags with CDPA-1 is generally comparable to those in DEHP bags. Hence, DINCH can be a viable alternative to DEHP in blood bags for nonleukoreduced RBC storage even without the use of next-generation additive solutions to improve RBC preservation quality.","PeriodicalId":505859,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","volume":"20 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro Evaluation of DINCH-Plasticized Blood Bags for Red Blood Cell Storage with CPDA-1 Anticoagulant\",\"authors\":\"Hyungsuk Kim, Kyunghoon Lee, Soo Hyun Seo, Y. J. Hong, Sang Mee Hwang, Jeong Su Park, Kyoung Un Park, Junghan Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000535625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is a plasticizer commonly used in blood bags. Despite its protective effects on red blood cell (RBC) storage, concerns about its reproductive toxicity exist. This study investigated the in vitro quality of RBC concentrates stored in bags using di(isononyl) cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH) as an alternative plasticizer. Methods: Using a pool-and-split study design, we produced 20 matched homogenous quintets of RBC concentrates in two DINCH bags and three DEHP bags with citrate phosphate dextrose adenine (CPDA-1) anticoagulant. RBC storage quality was assessed weekly for 35 days. Results: On day 35, the median hemolysis levels in the DINCH bags (0.297–0.342%) were marginally higher (p < 0.05) than the DEHP bags (0.204–0.240%). All DINCH bags showed <0.8% hemolysis. RBCs in the DINCH bags showed increased mean corpuscular volume and decreased eosin 5′ maleimide binding than in the DEHP bags. Higher pO2 and lower pCO2 levels in the DINCH bags indicated better gas permeability than in DEHP bags. Other metabolic parameters were comparable in both bags. Compared to DEHP, DINCH exhibited considerably lower levels of plasticizer leaching into blood bags. Conclusion: The quality of RBC concentrates stored for 35 days in DINCH-plasticized blood bags with CDPA-1 is generally comparable to those in DEHP bags. Hence, DINCH can be a viable alternative to DEHP in blood bags for nonleukoreduced RBC storage even without the use of next-generation additive solutions to improve RBC preservation quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"20 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己酯)(DEHP)是一种常用于血袋的增塑剂。尽管它对红细胞(RBC)的储存有保护作用,但其生殖毒性仍令人担忧。本研究调查了使用环己烷-1,2-二羧酸二(异壬基)酯(DINCH)作为替代增塑剂的血袋中储存的红细胞浓缩物的体外质量。方法:我们采用集合和拆分研究设计,在两个 DINCH 袋和三个含有柠檬酸磷酸盐葡萄糖腺嘌呤(CPDA-1)抗凝剂的 DEHP 袋中生产了 20 份匹配的同质五联红细胞浓缩物。在 35 天内,每周对 RBC 的储存质量进行一次评估。结果:第 35 天,DINCH 袋的溶血水平中值(0.297%-0.342%)略高于 DEHP 袋(0.204%-0.240%)(p < 0.05)。所有 DINCH 袋的溶血率均小于 0.8%。与 DEHP 袋相比,DINCH 袋中的红细胞平均血球容积增大,曙红 5′马来酰亚胺结合率降低。与 DEHP 袋相比,DINCH 袋中的 pO2 水平更高,pCO2 水平更低,表明气体渗透性更好。两袋中的其他代谢参数相当。与 DEHP 相比,DINCH 在血袋中的增塑剂沥滤水平要低得多。结论在含有 CDPA-1 的 DINCH 塑化血袋中储存 35 天的红细胞浓缩物的质量与 DEHP 袋中的质量基本相当。因此,即使不使用下一代添加剂解决方案来提高 RBC 的保存质量,DINCH 也可以作为 DEHP 的可行替代品,用于储存非白细胞的 RBC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In vitro Evaluation of DINCH-Plasticized Blood Bags for Red Blood Cell Storage with CPDA-1 Anticoagulant
Introduction: Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is a plasticizer commonly used in blood bags. Despite its protective effects on red blood cell (RBC) storage, concerns about its reproductive toxicity exist. This study investigated the in vitro quality of RBC concentrates stored in bags using di(isononyl) cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH) as an alternative plasticizer. Methods: Using a pool-and-split study design, we produced 20 matched homogenous quintets of RBC concentrates in two DINCH bags and three DEHP bags with citrate phosphate dextrose adenine (CPDA-1) anticoagulant. RBC storage quality was assessed weekly for 35 days. Results: On day 35, the median hemolysis levels in the DINCH bags (0.297–0.342%) were marginally higher (p < 0.05) than the DEHP bags (0.204–0.240%). All DINCH bags showed <0.8% hemolysis. RBCs in the DINCH bags showed increased mean corpuscular volume and decreased eosin 5′ maleimide binding than in the DEHP bags. Higher pO2 and lower pCO2 levels in the DINCH bags indicated better gas permeability than in DEHP bags. Other metabolic parameters were comparable in both bags. Compared to DEHP, DINCH exhibited considerably lower levels of plasticizer leaching into blood bags. Conclusion: The quality of RBC concentrates stored for 35 days in DINCH-plasticized blood bags with CDPA-1 is generally comparable to those in DEHP bags. Hence, DINCH can be a viable alternative to DEHP in blood bags for nonleukoreduced RBC storage even without the use of next-generation additive solutions to improve RBC preservation quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancing Transfusion Medicine through Raman Tweezers Spectroscopy: A Review of Recent Progress and Future Perspectives Single Apheresis Session on the 4th Day of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Administration Seems Convenient to Collect Enough Peripheral Blood Stem Cells from Healthy Donors Role of MiRNA in the Regulation of Blood Group Expression A Short History of B-Cell HLA Epitopes Successful Desensitization with Imlifidase and Daratumumab in a Highly Immunized, Crossmatch Positive, Blood Group-Incompatible Living-Donor Re-Transplant Recipient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1