Carlos Roberto Vargas Gálvez, Omar López Arbolay, Marlon Manuel Ortiz Machín
{"title":"颅底脑膜瘤的微创治疗方法","authors":"Carlos Roberto Vargas Gálvez, Omar López Arbolay, Marlon Manuel Ortiz Machín","doi":"10.1016/j.neucir.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Skull base meningiomas constitute a complex group of skull base tumors. The endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and endoscopic Keyhole have a minimally invasive philosophy with high effectiveness, safety, and a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity in these tumors.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the results of the use of minimally invasive approaches to skull base meningiomas.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in 140 patients at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital who underwent surgery for cranial base meningiomas using minimally invasive approaches to the cranial base. The degree of tumor resection, tumor recurrence, reinterventions, and complications were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>EEA were used in 72.8% of the study, while endoscopic Keyholes were used in 26.4% and combined approaches in 0.7%. In relation to total tumor resection, 91.9% was generally achieved. Overall tumor recurrence and reinterventions were less than 8.5% and 4%, respectively. Complications in EEA were: cerebrospinal fluid fistula (2.1%), diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus, cerebral infarction, surgical site hematoma, worsening of cranial nerves <span>i-iv</span> (1.4%) respectively. While in the Keyhole type approaches: seizures (2.9%), hydrocephalus (1.4%), cerebrospinal fluid fistula (1.4%), worsening of nerves <span>ix-xii</span> (0.7%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The following study reaffirms that minimally invasive approaches for skull base meningiomas constitute advanced surgical techniques for these tumors, associated with a low rate of postoperative complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51145,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abordajes mínimamente invasivos para meningiomas de la base craneal\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Roberto Vargas Gálvez, Omar López Arbolay, Marlon Manuel Ortiz Machín\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neucir.2023.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Skull base meningiomas constitute a complex group of skull base tumors. The endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and endoscopic Keyhole have a minimally invasive philosophy with high effectiveness, safety, and a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity in these tumors.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the results of the use of minimally invasive approaches to skull base meningiomas.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in 140 patients at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital who underwent surgery for cranial base meningiomas using minimally invasive approaches to the cranial base. The degree of tumor resection, tumor recurrence, reinterventions, and complications were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>EEA were used in 72.8% of the study, while endoscopic Keyholes were used in 26.4% and combined approaches in 0.7%. In relation to total tumor resection, 91.9% was generally achieved. Overall tumor recurrence and reinterventions were less than 8.5% and 4%, respectively. Complications in EEA were: cerebrospinal fluid fistula (2.1%), diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus, cerebral infarction, surgical site hematoma, worsening of cranial nerves <span>i-iv</span> (1.4%) respectively. While in the Keyhole type approaches: seizures (2.9%), hydrocephalus (1.4%), cerebrospinal fluid fistula (1.4%), worsening of nerves <span>ix-xii</span> (0.7%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The following study reaffirms that minimally invasive approaches for skull base meningiomas constitute advanced surgical techniques for these tumors, associated with a low rate of postoperative complications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocirugia\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 127-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocirugia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130147323003937\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130147323003937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abordajes mínimamente invasivos para meningiomas de la base craneal
Introduction
Skull base meningiomas constitute a complex group of skull base tumors. The endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and endoscopic Keyhole have a minimally invasive philosophy with high effectiveness, safety, and a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity in these tumors.
Objective
To describe the results of the use of minimally invasive approaches to skull base meningiomas.
Method
A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in 140 patients at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital who underwent surgery for cranial base meningiomas using minimally invasive approaches to the cranial base. The degree of tumor resection, tumor recurrence, reinterventions, and complications were evaluated.
Results
EEA were used in 72.8% of the study, while endoscopic Keyholes were used in 26.4% and combined approaches in 0.7%. In relation to total tumor resection, 91.9% was generally achieved. Overall tumor recurrence and reinterventions were less than 8.5% and 4%, respectively. Complications in EEA were: cerebrospinal fluid fistula (2.1%), diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus, cerebral infarction, surgical site hematoma, worsening of cranial nerves i-iv (1.4%) respectively. While in the Keyhole type approaches: seizures (2.9%), hydrocephalus (1.4%), cerebrospinal fluid fistula (1.4%), worsening of nerves ix-xii (0.7%).
Conclusions
The following study reaffirms that minimally invasive approaches for skull base meningiomas constitute advanced surgical techniques for these tumors, associated with a low rate of postoperative complications.
期刊介绍:
Neurocirugía is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (SENEC). It is published every 2 months (6 issues per year). Neurocirugía will consider for publication, original clinical and experimental scientific works associated with neurosurgery and other related neurological sciences.
All manuscripts are submitted for review by experts in the field (peer review) and are carried out anonymously (double blind). The Journal accepts works written in Spanish or English.