磁共振图像的自动肺部分割:一种新方法,应用于接受增强型深吸气-屏气治疗的健康志愿者,用于肺部肿瘤的运动诱导型四维质子治疗

John H. Missimer , Frank Emert , Antony J. Lomax , Damien C. Weber
{"title":"磁共振图像的自动肺部分割:一种新方法,应用于接受增强型深吸气-屏气治疗的健康志愿者,用于肺部肿瘤的运动诱导型四维质子治疗","authors":"John H. Missimer ,&nbsp;Frank Emert ,&nbsp;Antony J. Lomax ,&nbsp;Damien C. Weber","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Respiratory suppression techniques represent an effective motion mitigation strategy for 4D-irradiation of lung tumors with protons. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based study applied and analyzed methods for this purpose, including enhanced Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold (eDIBH). Twenty-one healthy volunteers (41–58 years) underwent thoracic MR scans in four imaging sessions containing two eDIBH-guided MRIs per session to simulate motion-dependent irradiation conditions. The automated MRI segmentation algorithm presented here was critical in determining the lung volumes (LVs) achieved during eDIBH.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study included 168 MRIs acquired under eDIBH conditions. The lung segmentation algorithm consisted of four analysis steps: (i) image preprocessing, (ii) MRI histogram analysis with thresholding, (iii) automatic segmentation, (iv) 3D-clustering. To validate the algorithm, 46 eDIBH-MRIs were manually contoured. Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and relative deviations of LVs were determined as similarity measures. Assessment of intrasessional and intersessional LV variations and their differences provided estimates of statistical and systematic errors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Lung segmentation time for 100 2D-MRI planes was ∼ 10 s. Compared to manual lung contouring, the median DSC was 0.94 with a lower 95 % confidence level (CL) of 0.92. The relative volume deviations yielded a median value of 0.059 and 95 % CLs of −0.013 and 0.13. Artifact-based volume errors, mainly of the trachea, were estimated. Estimated statistical and systematic errors ranged between 6 and 8 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The presented analytical algorithm is fast, precise, and readily available. The results are comparable to time-consuming, manual segmentations and other automatic segmentation approaches. Post-processing to remove image artifacts is under development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000010/pdfft?md5=bc535869d6a431c218a8911f84d20dba&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000010-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic lung segmentation of magnetic resonance images: A new approach applied to healthy volunteers undergoing enhanced Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold for motion-mitigated 4D proton therapy of lung tumors\",\"authors\":\"John H. Missimer ,&nbsp;Frank Emert ,&nbsp;Antony J. Lomax ,&nbsp;Damien C. Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Respiratory suppression techniques represent an effective motion mitigation strategy for 4D-irradiation of lung tumors with protons. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based study applied and analyzed methods for this purpose, including enhanced Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold (eDIBH). Twenty-one healthy volunteers (41–58 years) underwent thoracic MR scans in four imaging sessions containing two eDIBH-guided MRIs per session to simulate motion-dependent irradiation conditions. The automated MRI segmentation algorithm presented here was critical in determining the lung volumes (LVs) achieved during eDIBH.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study included 168 MRIs acquired under eDIBH conditions. The lung segmentation algorithm consisted of four analysis steps: (i) image preprocessing, (ii) MRI histogram analysis with thresholding, (iii) automatic segmentation, (iv) 3D-clustering. To validate the algorithm, 46 eDIBH-MRIs were manually contoured. Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and relative deviations of LVs were determined as similarity measures. Assessment of intrasessional and intersessional LV variations and their differences provided estimates of statistical and systematic errors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Lung segmentation time for 100 2D-MRI planes was ∼ 10 s. Compared to manual lung contouring, the median DSC was 0.94 with a lower 95 % confidence level (CL) of 0.92. The relative volume deviations yielded a median value of 0.059 and 95 % CLs of −0.013 and 0.13. Artifact-based volume errors, mainly of the trachea, were estimated. Estimated statistical and systematic errors ranged between 6 and 8 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The presented analytical algorithm is fast, precise, and readily available. The results are comparable to time-consuming, manual segmentations and other automatic segmentation approaches. Post-processing to remove image artifacts is under development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000010/pdfft?md5=bc535869d6a431c218a8911f84d20dba&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000010-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的呼吸抑制技术是利用质子对肺部肿瘤进行四维照射的一种有效的运动缓解策略。一项基于磁共振成像(MRI)的研究为此应用并分析了各种方法,包括增强型深吸气-呼吸保持(eDIBH)。21 名健康志愿者(41-58 岁)接受了四次胸部磁共振扫描,每次扫描包含两次 eDIBH 引导的磁共振成像,以模拟运动相关的辐照条件。本文介绍的自动磁共振成像分割算法对于确定 eDIBH 期间实现的肺容积 (LV) 至关重要。肺分割算法包括四个分析步骤:(i) 图像预处理,(ii) 带阈值的 MRI 直方图分析,(iii) 自动分割,(iv) 三维聚类。为了验证该算法,对 46 幅 eDIBH-MRI 图像进行了人工轮廓分析。索伦森-戴斯相似性系数(DSC)和左心室相对偏差被确定为相似性度量。结果 100 个 2D-MRI 平面的肺部分割时间为 10 秒。与人工肺部轮廓制作相比,DSC 的中位数为 0.94,95% 置信度(CL)为 0.92。相对容积偏差的中值为 0.059,95 % 置信度为-0.013 和 0.13。对基于伪影的容积误差进行了估计,主要是气管的误差。估计的统计误差和系统误差介于 6% 和 8% 之间。其结果可与耗时的人工分割和其他自动分割方法相媲美。消除图像伪影的后期处理正在开发中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Automatic lung segmentation of magnetic resonance images: A new approach applied to healthy volunteers undergoing enhanced Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold for motion-mitigated 4D proton therapy of lung tumors

Background and purpose

Respiratory suppression techniques represent an effective motion mitigation strategy for 4D-irradiation of lung tumors with protons. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based study applied and analyzed methods for this purpose, including enhanced Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold (eDIBH). Twenty-one healthy volunteers (41–58 years) underwent thoracic MR scans in four imaging sessions containing two eDIBH-guided MRIs per session to simulate motion-dependent irradiation conditions. The automated MRI segmentation algorithm presented here was critical in determining the lung volumes (LVs) achieved during eDIBH.

Materials and methods

The study included 168 MRIs acquired under eDIBH conditions. The lung segmentation algorithm consisted of four analysis steps: (i) image preprocessing, (ii) MRI histogram analysis with thresholding, (iii) automatic segmentation, (iv) 3D-clustering. To validate the algorithm, 46 eDIBH-MRIs were manually contoured. Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and relative deviations of LVs were determined as similarity measures. Assessment of intrasessional and intersessional LV variations and their differences provided estimates of statistical and systematic errors.

Results

Lung segmentation time for 100 2D-MRI planes was ∼ 10 s. Compared to manual lung contouring, the median DSC was 0.94 with a lower 95 % confidence level (CL) of 0.92. The relative volume deviations yielded a median value of 0.059 and 95 % CLs of −0.013 and 0.13. Artifact-based volume errors, mainly of the trachea, were estimated. Estimated statistical and systematic errors ranged between 6 and 8 %.

Conclusions

The presented analytical algorithm is fast, precise, and readily available. The results are comparable to time-consuming, manual segmentations and other automatic segmentation approaches. Post-processing to remove image artifacts is under development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Results of 2023 survey on the use of synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance Imaging-only radiotherapy: Current status and future steps Head and neck automatic multi-organ segmentation on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Automatic segmentation for magnetic resonance imaging guided individual elective lymph node irradiation in head and neck cancer patients Development of a novel 3D-printed dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for evaluation of four-dimensional computed tomography Technical feasibility of delivering a simultaneous integrated boost in partial breast irradiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1