使用扩展的 "接受后 "框架研究消费者对金融科技的采用情况

IF 6.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Bank Marketing Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1108/ijbm-10-2022-0448
Jia Qi, Swarn Chatterjee, Sheri Worthy, Keith Herndon, Bartosz Wojdynski
{"title":"使用扩展的 \"接受后 \"框架研究消费者对金融科技的采用情况","authors":"Jia Qi, Swarn Chatterjee, Sheri Worthy, Keith Herndon, Bartosz Wojdynski","doi":"10.1108/ijbm-10-2022-0448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Emerging literature on fintech has shown that consumers have been slow to adopt fintech-based products and services. However, limited literature is available regarding the factors associated with consumers' adoption of these products and services. This study aims to investigate the factors that are associated with consumer adoption of fintech-based products and services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Data on the usage and perception of smartphone financial apps by US residents ages 18–70 was collected in the fall of 2020. Based on the Extended Post-Acceptance Model (EPAM) framework, Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were applied to inspect how financial capability, perceived security and perceived usefulness affect fintech adoption.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Fintech proficiency, investment risk tolerance and perceived safety are positively associated with the frequency of fintech application use upon adoption. Consumers are more likely to feel safer if they are more financially capable and technologically proficient. Consumers with higher risk tolerance tend to believe fintech apps are safe to use. Consumers with higher fintech proficiency are more likely to recognize the usefulness of fintech services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study introduces a revised EPAM framework with antecedent factors, fintech proficiency and risk tolerance to investigate the factors associated with consumer adoption of fintech-based products and services. The key findings of this study validate the EPAM in the American context. Additionally, this research is among the first to have confirmed the direct relationship between perceived security and fintech adoption. The results have practical implications for existing fintech companies, banks and financial institutions, policymakers and financial advisory practices considering adopting fintech-based services for their clients.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51401,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using an extended post-acceptance framework to examine consumer adoption of fintech\",\"authors\":\"Jia Qi, Swarn Chatterjee, Sheri Worthy, Keith Herndon, Bartosz Wojdynski\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijbm-10-2022-0448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Emerging literature on fintech has shown that consumers have been slow to adopt fintech-based products and services. However, limited literature is available regarding the factors associated with consumers' adoption of these products and services. This study aims to investigate the factors that are associated with consumer adoption of fintech-based products and services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Data on the usage and perception of smartphone financial apps by US residents ages 18–70 was collected in the fall of 2020. Based on the Extended Post-Acceptance Model (EPAM) framework, Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were applied to inspect how financial capability, perceived security and perceived usefulness affect fintech adoption.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Fintech proficiency, investment risk tolerance and perceived safety are positively associated with the frequency of fintech application use upon adoption. Consumers are more likely to feel safer if they are more financially capable and technologically proficient. Consumers with higher risk tolerance tend to believe fintech apps are safe to use. Consumers with higher fintech proficiency are more likely to recognize the usefulness of fintech services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The study introduces a revised EPAM framework with antecedent factors, fintech proficiency and risk tolerance to investigate the factors associated with consumer adoption of fintech-based products and services. The key findings of this study validate the EPAM in the American context. Additionally, this research is among the first to have confirmed the direct relationship between perceived security and fintech adoption. The results have practical implications for existing fintech companies, banks and financial institutions, policymakers and financial advisory practices considering adopting fintech-based services for their clients.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":51401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bank Marketing\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bank Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-10-2022-0448\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-10-2022-0448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的有关金融科技的新兴文献表明,消费者在采用基于金融科技的产品和服务方面进展缓慢。然而,关于消费者采用这些产品和服务的相关因素的文献却很有限。本研究旨在调查消费者采用基于金融科技的产品和服务的相关因素。设计/方法/途径于 2020 年秋季收集了 18-70 岁美国居民对智能手机金融应用程序的使用和认知数据。基于扩展后接受模型(EPAM)框架,应用结构方程建模和确证因子分析来研究财务能力、安全感和实用性如何影响金融科技的采用。研究结果金融科技熟练程度、投资风险承受能力和安全感与金融科技应用采用后的使用频率呈正相关。如果消费者的金融能力和技术水平较高,他们就更有可能感到安全。风险承受能力较高的消费者倾向于认为金融科技应用程序的使用是安全的。原创性/价值本研究引入了一个修订的 EPAM 框架,其中包含前因因素、金融科技熟练程度和风险承受能力,以研究消费者采用基于金融科技的产品和服务的相关因素。本研究的主要发现在美国背景下验证了 EPAM。此外,这项研究也是首批证实感知安全性与金融科技采用之间存在直接关系的研究之一。研究结果对现有的金融科技公司、银行和金融机构、政策制定者以及考虑为客户采用金融科技服务的金融咨询机构具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using an extended post-acceptance framework to examine consumer adoption of fintech

Purpose

Emerging literature on fintech has shown that consumers have been slow to adopt fintech-based products and services. However, limited literature is available regarding the factors associated with consumers' adoption of these products and services. This study aims to investigate the factors that are associated with consumer adoption of fintech-based products and services.

Design/methodology/approach

Data on the usage and perception of smartphone financial apps by US residents ages 18–70 was collected in the fall of 2020. Based on the Extended Post-Acceptance Model (EPAM) framework, Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were applied to inspect how financial capability, perceived security and perceived usefulness affect fintech adoption.

Findings

Fintech proficiency, investment risk tolerance and perceived safety are positively associated with the frequency of fintech application use upon adoption. Consumers are more likely to feel safer if they are more financially capable and technologically proficient. Consumers with higher risk tolerance tend to believe fintech apps are safe to use. Consumers with higher fintech proficiency are more likely to recognize the usefulness of fintech services.

Originality/value

The study introduces a revised EPAM framework with antecedent factors, fintech proficiency and risk tolerance to investigate the factors associated with consumer adoption of fintech-based products and services. The key findings of this study validate the EPAM in the American context. Additionally, this research is among the first to have confirmed the direct relationship between perceived security and fintech adoption. The results have practical implications for existing fintech companies, banks and financial institutions, policymakers and financial advisory practices considering adopting fintech-based services for their clients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
18.90%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: International Journal of Bank Marketing (IJBM) aims to publish papers that relate to the marketing challenges of financial services providers around the globe. Preference is given to empirically-based research papers that expand on existing theories (or develop new ones) on customer behaviour in financial services settings. In addition, the journal is interested in helping academicians and practitioners in the field to better understand the discipline of financial services marketing, and as a result review papers and thought pieces are invited for submission.
期刊最新文献
Determinants of tweens’ saving intentions: a cross-sectional study What drives problematic Bitcoin investment behavior?: The role of financial literacy Dynamics of personal financial management: a bibliometric and systematic review on financial literacy, financial capability and financial behavior The augmenting role of digital banking in reconstructing women's economic empowerment Does leadership humility foster salesperson creativity? The serial mediating role of job satisfaction and knowledge sharing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1