INSURE:伊沙佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松治疗复发/难治性骨髓瘤的常规疗法汇总分析。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Future oncology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-10 DOI:10.2217/fon-2023-0604
Xavier Leleu, Hans C Lee, Jeffrey A Zonder, Margaret Macro, Karthik Ramasamy, Cyrille Hulin, Jiri Silar, Matyas Kuhn, Kaili Ren, Nawal Bent-Ennakhil, Dasha Cherepanov, Dawn Marie Stull, Evangelos Terpos
{"title":"INSURE:伊沙佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松治疗复发/难治性骨髓瘤的常规疗法汇总分析。","authors":"Xavier Leleu, Hans C Lee, Jeffrey A Zonder, Margaret Macro, Karthik Ramasamy, Cyrille Hulin, Jiri Silar, Matyas Kuhn, Kaili Ren, Nawal Bent-Ennakhil, Dasha Cherepanov, Dawn Marie Stull, Evangelos Terpos","doi":"10.2217/fon-2023-0604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> We pooled data from three observational studies (INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA and REMIX) to investigate the real-world effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory myeloma. <b>Materials & methods:</b> INSIGHT MM was a prospective study conducted in countries across Europe, Asia and North/Latin America while UVEA-IXA and REMIX were multicenter, retrospective/prospective studies conducted in Europe. Patients who had received IRd as ≥2nd line of therapy were analyzed. Primary outcomes were time-to-next treatment (TTNT) and progression-free survival (PFS). <b>Results:</b> Overall, 564 patients were included (median follow-up: 18.5 months). Median TTNT and PFS were 18.4 and 19.9 months; both outcomes were numerically longer for earlier versus later lines. Median treatment duration was 14.0 months. Overall response rate was 64.6%. No new safety concerns were noted. <b>Conclusion:</b> The effectiveness of IRd in routine practice appears similar to the efficacy observed in TOURMALINE-MM1. IRd benefit in earlier versus later lines was consistent with previous reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"935-950"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INSURE: a pooled analysis of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory myeloma in routine practice.\",\"authors\":\"Xavier Leleu, Hans C Lee, Jeffrey A Zonder, Margaret Macro, Karthik Ramasamy, Cyrille Hulin, Jiri Silar, Matyas Kuhn, Kaili Ren, Nawal Bent-Ennakhil, Dasha Cherepanov, Dawn Marie Stull, Evangelos Terpos\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/fon-2023-0604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> We pooled data from three observational studies (INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA and REMIX) to investigate the real-world effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory myeloma. <b>Materials & methods:</b> INSIGHT MM was a prospective study conducted in countries across Europe, Asia and North/Latin America while UVEA-IXA and REMIX were multicenter, retrospective/prospective studies conducted in Europe. Patients who had received IRd as ≥2nd line of therapy were analyzed. Primary outcomes were time-to-next treatment (TTNT) and progression-free survival (PFS). <b>Results:</b> Overall, 564 patients were included (median follow-up: 18.5 months). Median TTNT and PFS were 18.4 and 19.9 months; both outcomes were numerically longer for earlier versus later lines. Median treatment duration was 14.0 months. Overall response rate was 64.6%. No new safety concerns were noted. <b>Conclusion:</b> The effectiveness of IRd in routine practice appears similar to the efficacy observed in TOURMALINE-MM1. IRd benefit in earlier versus later lines was consistent with previous reports.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"935-950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2023-0604\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2023-0604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们汇总了三项观察性研究(INSIGHT MM、UVEA-IXA 和 REMIX)的数据,以调查伊沙佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松(IRd)在复发/难治性骨髓瘤中的实际疗效。材料与方法:INSIGHT MM是一项前瞻性研究,在欧洲、亚洲和北美洲/拉丁美洲各国开展,而UVEA-IXA和REMIX则是在欧洲开展的多中心、回顾性/前瞻性研究。研究分析了接受 IRd 作为≥二线疗法的患者。主要结果是下次治疗时间(TTNT)和无进展生存期(PFS)。结果:共纳入 564 例患者(中位随访时间:18.5 个月)。TTNT和PFS的中位数分别为18.4个月和19.9个月;这两项结果在数量上都是前线患者长于后线患者。中位治疗时间为 14.0 个月。总体反应率为 64.6%。未发现新的安全性问题。结论IRd在常规治疗中的疗效与在TOURMALINE-MM1中观察到的疗效相似。IRd在早产线与晚产线中的获益与之前的报告一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
INSURE: a pooled analysis of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory myeloma in routine practice.

Aim: We pooled data from three observational studies (INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA and REMIX) to investigate the real-world effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Materials & methods: INSIGHT MM was a prospective study conducted in countries across Europe, Asia and North/Latin America while UVEA-IXA and REMIX were multicenter, retrospective/prospective studies conducted in Europe. Patients who had received IRd as ≥2nd line of therapy were analyzed. Primary outcomes were time-to-next treatment (TTNT) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Overall, 564 patients were included (median follow-up: 18.5 months). Median TTNT and PFS were 18.4 and 19.9 months; both outcomes were numerically longer for earlier versus later lines. Median treatment duration was 14.0 months. Overall response rate was 64.6%. No new safety concerns were noted. Conclusion: The effectiveness of IRd in routine practice appears similar to the efficacy observed in TOURMALINE-MM1. IRd benefit in earlier versus later lines was consistent with previous reports.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
期刊最新文献
Sotorasib for the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Artificial intelligence and radiomics in desmoid-type fibromatosis: are we there yet? Evaluation of CDK4/6 inhibitors in first-line in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with metastatic breast cancer. Tislelizumab for consolidation therapy in patients with pathologically residual Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after definitive concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled phase II trial. Current practices for the management of advanced high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer in the UK: OC-NOW survey (2023).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1