门诊脊髓损伤患者尿路感染的抗生素图谱数据。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosciences Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230063
Saeed Alshahri, Abdullah Alghaiheb, Abdullah Alanazi, Sultanah Alshammari, Abdullah Alomair
{"title":"门诊脊髓损伤患者尿路感染的抗生素图谱数据。","authors":"Saeed Alshahri, Abdullah Alghaiheb, Abdullah Alanazi, Sultanah Alshammari, Abdullah Alomair","doi":"10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish antibiogram data for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) that would help differentiate the organisms commonly present depending on the voiding method and antibiotic sensitivity for empirical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 499 urine culture results were obtained from 151 SCI patients with symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) with significant bacteriuria and pyuria with more than 10 white blood cells per high power field. The voiding method was categorized as follows: self-intermittent catheterization (SIC), suprapubic catheter (SPC), Foley catheter, condom catheter, or voiding freely.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic data were as follows: male, n=124 (82.2%); female, n=27 (17.8%); mean age, 39; paraplegic n=105 (69.5%); and tetraplegic, n=45 (29.8%). The SIC was the most common voiding method (n=64, 42.3%), followed by Foley catheter (n=39, 25.8%). Escherichia coli was the most common organism overall (29%) and more frequent in patients using SIC as the voiding method. <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> was present more frequently in patients using SPC (33%), and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> in voiding freely cultures (30%). Antibiotic sensitivity was as follows Gentamicin (44.1%), Nitrofurantoin (39.1%), Augmentin (33.5%), and Ciprofloxacin (31.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased preference of the local population to foley catheter as a voiding method which needs to be investigated more. The type of voiding methods in patients with SCI results in different common causative organisms of UTI. Ciprofloxacin resistance profile increased overall except in patients voiding with SPC. Nitrofurantoin is the most overall sensitive oral antibiotic in our sample followed by Augmentin then Cefuroxime.</p>","PeriodicalId":19284,"journal":{"name":"Neurosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10827016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiogram data of urinary tract infection in spinal cord injury patients in an outpatient setting.\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Alshahri, Abdullah Alghaiheb, Abdullah Alanazi, Sultanah Alshammari, Abdullah Alomair\",\"doi\":\"10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish antibiogram data for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) that would help differentiate the organisms commonly present depending on the voiding method and antibiotic sensitivity for empirical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 499 urine culture results were obtained from 151 SCI patients with symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) with significant bacteriuria and pyuria with more than 10 white blood cells per high power field. The voiding method was categorized as follows: self-intermittent catheterization (SIC), suprapubic catheter (SPC), Foley catheter, condom catheter, or voiding freely.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic data were as follows: male, n=124 (82.2%); female, n=27 (17.8%); mean age, 39; paraplegic n=105 (69.5%); and tetraplegic, n=45 (29.8%). The SIC was the most common voiding method (n=64, 42.3%), followed by Foley catheter (n=39, 25.8%). Escherichia coli was the most common organism overall (29%) and more frequent in patients using SIC as the voiding method. <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> was present more frequently in patients using SPC (33%), and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> in voiding freely cultures (30%). Antibiotic sensitivity was as follows Gentamicin (44.1%), Nitrofurantoin (39.1%), Augmentin (33.5%), and Ciprofloxacin (31.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased preference of the local population to foley catheter as a voiding method which needs to be investigated more. The type of voiding methods in patients with SCI results in different common causative organisms of UTI. Ciprofloxacin resistance profile increased overall except in patients voiding with SPC. Nitrofurantoin is the most overall sensitive oral antibiotic in our sample followed by Augmentin then Cefuroxime.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10827016/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为脊髓损伤(SCI)患者建立抗生素图谱数据,以帮助根据排尿方式和抗生素敏感性区分常见微生物,从而进行经验性治疗:建立脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的抗生素图谱数据,以帮助根据排尿方法和经验性治疗的抗生素敏感性区分常见的微生物:从 151 名有症状的尿路感染(UTI)患者共获得 499 份尿培养结果,这些患者均有明显的细菌尿和脓尿,且每个高倍视野中的白细胞数超过 10 个。排尿方式分为以下几种:自我间歇导尿(SIC)、耻骨上导尿(SPC)、Foley导尿管、安全套导尿管或自由排尿:人口统计学数据如下:男性,124 人(82.2%);女性,27 人(17.8%);平均年龄 39 岁;截瘫者,105 人(69.5%);四肢瘫痪者,45 人(29.8%)。最常见的排尿方式是SIC(64人,42.3%),其次是Foley导尿管(39人,25.8%)。大肠埃希菌是最常见的微生物(29%),在使用 SIC 作为排尿方式的患者中更为常见。在使用 SPC 的患者中,奇异变形杆菌更常见(33%),而在自由排尿培养物中,肺炎克雷伯菌更常见(30%)。抗生素敏感性如下:庆大霉素(44.1%)、硝基呋喃妥因(39.1%)、奥门汀(33.5%)和环丙沙星(31.5%):当地人越来越倾向于使用气囊导尿管作为排尿方式,这需要进一步调查。SCI 患者的排尿方式不同,导致尿路感染的常见致病菌也不同。除使用 SPC 排尿的患者外,环丙沙星的耐药性总体呈上升趋势。在我们的样本中,硝基呋喃妥因是最敏感的口服抗生素,其次是奥古斯丁,然后是头孢呋辛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiogram data of urinary tract infection in spinal cord injury patients in an outpatient setting.

Objectives: To establish antibiogram data for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) that would help differentiate the organisms commonly present depending on the voiding method and antibiotic sensitivity for empirical treatment.

Methods: A total of 499 urine culture results were obtained from 151 SCI patients with symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) with significant bacteriuria and pyuria with more than 10 white blood cells per high power field. The voiding method was categorized as follows: self-intermittent catheterization (SIC), suprapubic catheter (SPC), Foley catheter, condom catheter, or voiding freely.

Results: The demographic data were as follows: male, n=124 (82.2%); female, n=27 (17.8%); mean age, 39; paraplegic n=105 (69.5%); and tetraplegic, n=45 (29.8%). The SIC was the most common voiding method (n=64, 42.3%), followed by Foley catheter (n=39, 25.8%). Escherichia coli was the most common organism overall (29%) and more frequent in patients using SIC as the voiding method. Proteus mirabilis was present more frequently in patients using SPC (33%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae in voiding freely cultures (30%). Antibiotic sensitivity was as follows Gentamicin (44.1%), Nitrofurantoin (39.1%), Augmentin (33.5%), and Ciprofloxacin (31.5%).

Conclusion: Increased preference of the local population to foley catheter as a voiding method which needs to be investigated more. The type of voiding methods in patients with SCI results in different common causative organisms of UTI. Ciprofloxacin resistance profile increased overall except in patients voiding with SPC. Nitrofurantoin is the most overall sensitive oral antibiotic in our sample followed by Augmentin then Cefuroxime.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosciences
Neurosciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Neurosciences is an open access, peer-reviewed, quarterly publication. Authors are invited to submit for publication articles reporting original work related to the nervous system, e.g., neurology, neurophysiology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery, neurorehabilitation, neurooncology, neuropsychiatry, and neurogenetics, etc. Basic research withclear clinical implications will also be considered. Review articles of current interest and high standard are welcomed for consideration. Prospective workshould not be backdated. There are also sections for Case Reports, Brief Communication, Correspondence, and medical news items. To promote continuous education, training, and learning, we include Clinical Images and MCQ’s. Highlights of international and regional meetings of interest, and specialized supplements will also be considered. All submissions must conform to the Uniform Requirements.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of clinician adherence to Fingolimod instructions and its effect on patient safety. Can artificial intelligence techniques help clinicians assess and treat patients with bone fractures? CAN PROBIOTICS PLUS VITAMIN D SUPPLEMENTS BENEFIT PEOPLE WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA? Comment on: Effectiveness of radiology modalities in diagnosing and characterizing brain disorders. Intracerebral benign fibrous histiocytoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1