FlaQuM-Quickscan:将初级保健专业人员的观点纳入医院质量优先事项评估的起点。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.12.002
F. Claessens , D. Seys , C. Van der Auwera , E.M. Castro , A. Jans , B. Schoenmakers , D. De Ridder , L. Bruyneel , A. Van Wilder , K. Vanhaecht , the ‘FlaQuM Research group’
{"title":"FlaQuM-Quickscan:将初级保健专业人员的观点纳入医院质量优先事项评估的起点。","authors":"F. Claessens ,&nbsp;D. Seys ,&nbsp;C. Van der Auwera ,&nbsp;E.M. Castro ,&nbsp;A. Jans ,&nbsp;B. Schoenmakers ,&nbsp;D. De Ridder ,&nbsp;L. Bruyneel ,&nbsp;A. Van Wilder ,&nbsp;K. Vanhaecht ,&nbsp;the ‘FlaQuM Research group’","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Today, primary care professionals’ (PCPs) perspectives on hospital quality are unknown when evaluating hospital quality priorities. The aims of the present study were to identify key healthcare quality attributes from PCPs’ perspective, to validate an instrument that measures PCPs’ experiences of healthcare quality multidimensionally and to define hospital quality priorities based on PCPs’ experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Focus groups with PCPs were conducted to identify quality attributes through a qualitative in-depth analysis. A multicentre study of 18 hospitals was used to quantitatively assess construct, discriminant and criterion validity of the FlaQuM-Quickscan, an instrument that measures ‘Healthcare quality for patients and kin’ (part 1) and ‘Healthcare quality for professionals’ (part 2). To set quality priorities, scores on quality domains were analyzed descriptively and between-hospital variation was examined by evaluating differences in hospitals’ mean scores on the quality domains using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Identified key attributes largely corresponded with Lachman's multidimensional quality model. Including ‘Communication’ as a new quality domain was recommended. The FlaQuM-Quickscan was completed by 550 PCPs. Confirmatory factor analyses showed reasonable to good fit, except for the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) in part 2. The ‘Equity’ domain scored the highest in parts 1 and 2. Domains ‘Kin-centred care’ and ‘Accessibility and timeliness’ scored the lowest in part 1 and ‘Resilience’ and ‘Partnership and co-production’ in part 2. Significant variation in hospitals’ mean scores was observed for eleven domains in part 1 and sixteen domains in part 2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results gained a better understanding of PCPs’ perspective on quality. The FlaQuM-Quickscan is a valid instrument to measure PCPs’ experiences of hospital quality. Identified priorities indicate that hospital management should focus on multifaceted quality strategies, including technical domains, person-and kin-centredness, core values and catalysts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The FlaQuM-Quickscan: A starting point to include primary care professionals’ perspectives in the evaluation of hospital quality priorities\",\"authors\":\"F. Claessens ,&nbsp;D. Seys ,&nbsp;C. Van der Auwera ,&nbsp;E.M. Castro ,&nbsp;A. Jans ,&nbsp;B. Schoenmakers ,&nbsp;D. De Ridder ,&nbsp;L. Bruyneel ,&nbsp;A. Van Wilder ,&nbsp;K. Vanhaecht ,&nbsp;the ‘FlaQuM Research group’\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Today, primary care professionals’ (PCPs) perspectives on hospital quality are unknown when evaluating hospital quality priorities. The aims of the present study were to identify key healthcare quality attributes from PCPs’ perspective, to validate an instrument that measures PCPs’ experiences of healthcare quality multidimensionally and to define hospital quality priorities based on PCPs’ experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Focus groups with PCPs were conducted to identify quality attributes through a qualitative in-depth analysis. A multicentre study of 18 hospitals was used to quantitatively assess construct, discriminant and criterion validity of the FlaQuM-Quickscan, an instrument that measures ‘Healthcare quality for patients and kin’ (part 1) and ‘Healthcare quality for professionals’ (part 2). To set quality priorities, scores on quality domains were analyzed descriptively and between-hospital variation was examined by evaluating differences in hospitals’ mean scores on the quality domains using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Identified key attributes largely corresponded with Lachman's multidimensional quality model. Including ‘Communication’ as a new quality domain was recommended. The FlaQuM-Quickscan was completed by 550 PCPs. Confirmatory factor analyses showed reasonable to good fit, except for the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) in part 2. The ‘Equity’ domain scored the highest in parts 1 and 2. Domains ‘Kin-centred care’ and ‘Accessibility and timeliness’ scored the lowest in part 1 and ‘Resilience’ and ‘Partnership and co-production’ in part 2. Significant variation in hospitals’ mean scores was observed for eleven domains in part 1 and sixteen domains in part 2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results gained a better understanding of PCPs’ perspective on quality. The FlaQuM-Quickscan is a valid instrument to measure PCPs’ experiences of hospital quality. Identified priorities indicate that hospital management should focus on multifaceted quality strategies, including technical domains, person-and kin-centredness, core values and catalysts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:如今,在评估医院质量优先事项时,初级保健专业人员(PCPs)对医院质量的看法尚不为人知。本研究旨在从初级保健专业人员的视角确定关键的医疗质量属性,验证一种可多维度衡量初级保健专业人员医疗质量体验的工具,并根据初级保健专业人员的体验确定医院质量优先事项:与初级保健医生进行焦点小组讨论,通过深入的定性分析确定质量属性。对 18 家医院进行多中心研究,定量评估 FlaQuM-Quickscan 的结构、判别和标准有效性,该工具可测量 "患者和亲属的医疗质量"(第 1 部分)和 "专业人员的医疗质量"(第 2 部分)。为了确定质量优先次序,我们对质量领域的得分进行了描述性分析,并通过单因素方差分析(ANOVA)评估医院在质量领域平均得分的差异,检查了医院之间的差异:结果:确定的关键属性与拉赫曼的多维质量模型基本一致。建议将 "沟通 "作为一个新的质量领域。550 名初级保健医生完成了 FlaQuM-Quickscan 扫描。除了第 2 部分的近似均方根误差 (RMSEA) 外,确认性因子分析显示出合理到良好的拟合度。公平 "领域在第 1 部分和第 2 部分中得分最高。以亲属为中心的护理 "和 "可及性和及时性 "在第 1 部分中得分最低,而 "复原力 "和 "合作与共同生产 "在第 2 部分中得分最低。在第 1 部分的 11 个领域和第 2 部分的 16 个领域中,各医院的平均得分存在显著差异:这些结果有助于更好地了解初级保健医生对质量的看法。FlaQuM-Quickscan 是衡量初级保健医生对医院质量体验的有效工具。已确定的优先事项表明,医院管理应侧重于多方面的质量战略,包括技术领域、以人为本和以亲属为本、核心价值观和催化剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The FlaQuM-Quickscan: A starting point to include primary care professionals’ perspectives in the evaluation of hospital quality priorities

Introduction

Today, primary care professionals’ (PCPs) perspectives on hospital quality are unknown when evaluating hospital quality priorities. The aims of the present study were to identify key healthcare quality attributes from PCPs’ perspective, to validate an instrument that measures PCPs’ experiences of healthcare quality multidimensionally and to define hospital quality priorities based on PCPs’ experiences.

Material and methods

Focus groups with PCPs were conducted to identify quality attributes through a qualitative in-depth analysis. A multicentre study of 18 hospitals was used to quantitatively assess construct, discriminant and criterion validity of the FlaQuM-Quickscan, an instrument that measures ‘Healthcare quality for patients and kin’ (part 1) and ‘Healthcare quality for professionals’ (part 2). To set quality priorities, scores on quality domains were analyzed descriptively and between-hospital variation was examined by evaluating differences in hospitals’ mean scores on the quality domains using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).

Results

Identified key attributes largely corresponded with Lachman's multidimensional quality model. Including ‘Communication’ as a new quality domain was recommended. The FlaQuM-Quickscan was completed by 550 PCPs. Confirmatory factor analyses showed reasonable to good fit, except for the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) in part 2. The ‘Equity’ domain scored the highest in parts 1 and 2. Domains ‘Kin-centred care’ and ‘Accessibility and timeliness’ scored the lowest in part 1 and ‘Resilience’ and ‘Partnership and co-production’ in part 2. Significant variation in hospitals’ mean scores was observed for eleven domains in part 1 and sixteen domains in part 2.

Conclusions

The results gained a better understanding of PCPs’ perspective on quality. The FlaQuM-Quickscan is a valid instrument to measure PCPs’ experiences of hospital quality. Identified priorities indicate that hospital management should focus on multifaceted quality strategies, including technical domains, person-and kin-centredness, core values and catalysts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
Informational and educational needs of caregivers of neurologic inpatients in rehabilitation treatment: A qualitative exploratory study. [Outcomes of using Pulse Point Arrow as lean healthcare tool for managing paediatric patient safety in the surgical area]. Enhancing vaccine accessibility and efficacy through microneedle patches. [A practical model to implement the patient participation in tertiary hospitals (ICE model)]. [Integrated social value generated in a specialized hospital for chronic patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1