创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、心理灵活性和心理适应问题:创伤后应激障碍核对表短式 DSM-5(PCL-5-S)的土耳其验证

Murat Yıldırım , Serkan Cengiz , Izaddin Ahmad Aziz , Arash Ziapour , Mehmet Emin Turan
{"title":"创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、心理灵活性和心理适应问题:创伤后应激障碍核对表短式 DSM-5(PCL-5-S)的土耳其验证","authors":"Murat Yıldırım ,&nbsp;Serkan Cengiz ,&nbsp;Izaddin Ahmad Aziz ,&nbsp;Arash Ziapour ,&nbsp;Mehmet Emin Turan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Despite the existence of abbreviated versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist (PCL-5), the lack of evidence regarding the validation of this measure has become a limitation in research. This study examined the Turkish validation of the PCL-5, which is a recently developed measure of an optimal short‐form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5. Also, the study aimed to investigate how psychological flexibility mediates the association between PTSD and psychological adjustment problems. This cross-sectional study consisted of 568 young adults (50.5 % males) aged between 18 and 60 years (</span><em>M</em> = 27.92, SD = 9.26). The results indicated that the PCL-5-S had good internal consistency reliability and high construct validity. The findings also revealed that PTSD was negatively associated with psychological flexibility and positively associated with psychological adjustment problems. Additionally, psychological flexibility was negatively associated with psychological adjustment problems. Furthermore, mediation findings showed that psychological flexibility partially mediated the association between PTSD and psychological adjustment problems. These findings suggest that the PCL-5-S is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the presence of PTSD symptoms in Turkish populations. Furthermore, intervention programs targeting psychological flexibility could be developed to reduce the symptoms of psychological maladjustment problems by addressing PTSD symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), psychological flexibility and psychological adjustment problems: Turkish validation of the PTSD checklist for short form DSM‐5 (PCL‐5-S)\",\"authors\":\"Murat Yıldırım ,&nbsp;Serkan Cengiz ,&nbsp;Izaddin Ahmad Aziz ,&nbsp;Arash Ziapour ,&nbsp;Mehmet Emin Turan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Despite the existence of abbreviated versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist (PCL-5), the lack of evidence regarding the validation of this measure has become a limitation in research. This study examined the Turkish validation of the PCL-5, which is a recently developed measure of an optimal short‐form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5. Also, the study aimed to investigate how psychological flexibility mediates the association between PTSD and psychological adjustment problems. This cross-sectional study consisted of 568 young adults (50.5 % males) aged between 18 and 60 years (</span><em>M</em> = 27.92, SD = 9.26). The results indicated that the PCL-5-S had good internal consistency reliability and high construct validity. The findings also revealed that PTSD was negatively associated with psychological flexibility and positively associated with psychological adjustment problems. Additionally, psychological flexibility was negatively associated with psychological adjustment problems. Furthermore, mediation findings showed that psychological flexibility partially mediated the association between PTSD and psychological adjustment problems. These findings suggest that the PCL-5-S is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the presence of PTSD symptoms in Turkish populations. Furthermore, intervention programs targeting psychological flexibility could be developed to reduce the symptoms of psychological maladjustment problems by addressing PTSD symptoms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246874992400005X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246874992400005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)核对表(PCL-5)的缩略版,但缺乏有关该量表验证的证据已成为研究中的一个局限。本研究考察了 PCL-5 在土耳其的验证情况,PCL-5 是最近为 DSM-5 开发的创伤后应激障碍核对表的最佳简表。此外,本研究还旨在探讨心理灵活性如何调节创伤后应激障碍与心理适应问题之间的关联。这项横断面研究由 568 名年龄在 18 岁至 60 岁之间的年轻人(50.5% 为男性)组成(M = 27.92,SD = 9.26)。结果表明,PCL-5-S 具有良好的内部一致性信度和较高的建构效度。研究结果还显示,创伤后应激障碍与心理灵活性呈负相关,而与心理适应问题呈正相关。此外,心理灵活性与心理适应问题呈负相关。此外,中介研究结果表明,心理灵活性对创伤后应激障碍和心理适应问题之间的关联起到了部分中介作用。这些研究结果表明,PCL-5-S 是评估土耳其人群是否存在创伤后应激障碍症状的有效而可靠的工具。此外,针对创伤后应激障碍症状,还可以制定以心理灵活性为目标的干预计划,以减少心理适应不良问题的症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), psychological flexibility and psychological adjustment problems: Turkish validation of the PTSD checklist for short form DSM‐5 (PCL‐5-S)

Despite the existence of abbreviated versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist (PCL-5), the lack of evidence regarding the validation of this measure has become a limitation in research. This study examined the Turkish validation of the PCL-5, which is a recently developed measure of an optimal short‐form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5. Also, the study aimed to investigate how psychological flexibility mediates the association between PTSD and psychological adjustment problems. This cross-sectional study consisted of 568 young adults (50.5 % males) aged between 18 and 60 years (M = 27.92, SD = 9.26). The results indicated that the PCL-5-S had good internal consistency reliability and high construct validity. The findings also revealed that PTSD was negatively associated with psychological flexibility and positively associated with psychological adjustment problems. Additionally, psychological flexibility was negatively associated with psychological adjustment problems. Furthermore, mediation findings showed that psychological flexibility partially mediated the association between PTSD and psychological adjustment problems. These findings suggest that the PCL-5-S is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the presence of PTSD symptoms in Turkish populations. Furthermore, intervention programs targeting psychological flexibility could be developed to reduce the symptoms of psychological maladjustment problems by addressing PTSD symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories for Complex PTSD – A pilot quasi-experimental study from a wellness centre in India Adverse childhood experiences and dissociation among Italian public psychology service users Résistance et trauma: introduire l'existence Exploring the interplay between dreams, Early Maladaptive Schemas and demanding parenting style in Malaysia: A qualitative study Parent-Child EMDR therapy for children aged 0–4 years: Protocol, pilot-data, and case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1