调查听力理解评估中不同交互变量的不同项目功能

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101322
Vahid Aryadoust , Shangchao Min , Xueliang Chen
{"title":"调查听力理解评估中不同交互变量的不同项目功能","authors":"Vahid Aryadoust ,&nbsp;Shangchao Min ,&nbsp;Xueliang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis is essential to ensuring the equity of measurement for different subgroups at the item level and is an integral part of validity. However, existing DIF research often overlooks within-group heterogeneity, commonly assuming that test takers from different subgroups comprise a homogeneous population. This study investigated DIF across gender, academic background, and their interaction in listening comprehension assessment using Rasch measurement. It found that ignoring within-group heterogeneity would lead to the under-detection of DIF, likely due to the cancellation of DIF at broader group levels. In addition, the study is the first to investigate DIF in a linked test, a scenario more prevalent in practical testing. The findings of the study highlight the importance of accounting for within-group heterogeneity in test fairness investigations in language assessment research and point to the potential effect of test linking and equating on DIF analysis and interpretation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 101322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating differential item functioning across interaction variables in listening comprehension assessment\",\"authors\":\"Vahid Aryadoust ,&nbsp;Shangchao Min ,&nbsp;Xueliang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis is essential to ensuring the equity of measurement for different subgroups at the item level and is an integral part of validity. However, existing DIF research often overlooks within-group heterogeneity, commonly assuming that test takers from different subgroups comprise a homogeneous population. This study investigated DIF across gender, academic background, and their interaction in listening comprehension assessment using Rasch measurement. It found that ignoring within-group heterogeneity would lead to the under-detection of DIF, likely due to the cancellation of DIF at broader group levels. In addition, the study is the first to investigate DIF in a linked test, a scenario more prevalent in practical testing. The findings of the study highlight the importance of accounting for within-group heterogeneity in test fairness investigations in language assessment research and point to the potential effect of test linking and equating on DIF analysis and interpretation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

差异项目功能(DIF)分析对于确保不同亚群体在项目层面上的测量公平性至关重要,也是效度不可分割的一部分。然而,现有的 DIF 研究往往忽视了组内异质性,通常假设来自不同亚组的应试者构成了一个同质群体。本研究使用 Rasch 测量法调查了听力理解评估中不同性别、学术背景的 DIF 及其交互作用。研究发现,忽略组内异质性会导致 DIF 检测不足,这可能是由于 DIF 在更广泛的组水平上被抵消了。此外,该研究还首次调查了关联测试中的 DIF,这种情况在实际测试中更为普遍。研究结果强调了在语言测评研究中进行测试公平性调查时考虑组内异质性的重要性,并指出了测试链接和等效对 DIF 分析和解释的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating differential item functioning across interaction variables in listening comprehension assessment

Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis is essential to ensuring the equity of measurement for different subgroups at the item level and is an integral part of validity. However, existing DIF research often overlooks within-group heterogeneity, commonly assuming that test takers from different subgroups comprise a homogeneous population. This study investigated DIF across gender, academic background, and their interaction in listening comprehension assessment using Rasch measurement. It found that ignoring within-group heterogeneity would lead to the under-detection of DIF, likely due to the cancellation of DIF at broader group levels. In addition, the study is the first to investigate DIF in a linked test, a scenario more prevalent in practical testing. The findings of the study highlight the importance of accounting for within-group heterogeneity in test fairness investigations in language assessment research and point to the potential effect of test linking and equating on DIF analysis and interpretation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
期刊最新文献
A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations Preservice teachers’ pedagogical and psychological knowledge: Structure and learning opportunities The effects of peer feedback provision and reception on lower-proficiency EFL learners’ writing development Assessment as learning: Evidence based on meta-analysis and quantitative ethnography research Teaching quality and student achievement inequalities in low- and middle-income countries: A hierarchical linear model analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1