社会创新类型学:聚类方法比较研究

IF 6.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1007/s11365-023-00924-8
Laura Rodrigo, Isabel Ortiz-Marcos, Miguel Palacios
{"title":"社会创新类型学:聚类方法比较研究","authors":"Laura Rodrigo, Isabel Ortiz-Marcos, Miguel Palacios","doi":"10.1007/s11365-023-00924-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study offers a typology of the Social Innovation (SI) field. A sample of 5,152 documents from the Scopus database is screened using a clustering process. Using measures for inferring similarities from co-occurrence data, we identified the main themes addressed in the field, presenting a collection of keywords structured into clusters and categories. Bibliographic coupling and co-citation clustering find significant related documents and the VOS algorithm maps two sets of relevant clusters. The maps of these bibliometric analyses were contrasted through an analytical process identifying and classifying the research questions in each. This combined methodology proposes a typology that contributes to the integration of the different disciplines that structure the field by bridging the boundaries of the knowledge areas generated during the conceptualisation process. The typology confirms a matrix of six consolidated disciplines (transformation, social entrepreneurship, design, theory, territorial development, and governance) as well as three emerging clusters, a human cluster related to demographic challenges and two central sets bringing together specific aspects of social technologies and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This classification provides a picture of the current intellectual structure of the field, pulling together publications relevant to the different academic communities and providing clarity and a more manageable approach to handling the large volume of information faced when designing and substantiating systematic studies and future research on SI.</p>","PeriodicalId":48058,"journal":{"name":"International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A typology of social innovation: A comparative study of clustering methodologies\",\"authors\":\"Laura Rodrigo, Isabel Ortiz-Marcos, Miguel Palacios\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11365-023-00924-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study offers a typology of the Social Innovation (SI) field. A sample of 5,152 documents from the Scopus database is screened using a clustering process. Using measures for inferring similarities from co-occurrence data, we identified the main themes addressed in the field, presenting a collection of keywords structured into clusters and categories. Bibliographic coupling and co-citation clustering find significant related documents and the VOS algorithm maps two sets of relevant clusters. The maps of these bibliometric analyses were contrasted through an analytical process identifying and classifying the research questions in each. This combined methodology proposes a typology that contributes to the integration of the different disciplines that structure the field by bridging the boundaries of the knowledge areas generated during the conceptualisation process. The typology confirms a matrix of six consolidated disciplines (transformation, social entrepreneurship, design, theory, territorial development, and governance) as well as three emerging clusters, a human cluster related to demographic challenges and two central sets bringing together specific aspects of social technologies and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This classification provides a picture of the current intellectual structure of the field, pulling together publications relevant to the different academic communities and providing clarity and a more manageable approach to handling the large volume of information faced when designing and substantiating systematic studies and future research on SI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00924-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00924-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对社会创新(SI)领域进行了分类。我们使用聚类方法筛选了 Scopus 数据库中的 5,152 篇文档样本。我们利用共现数据的相似性推断方法,确定了该领域的主要主题,并将关键词集合划分为不同的群组和类别。书目耦合和共现聚类可以找到重要的相关文献,而 VOS 算法则可以绘制出两组相关的聚类图。这些文献计量分析的图谱通过一个分析过程进行对比,确定每个图谱中的研究问题并对其进行分类。这种综合方法提出了一种类型学,通过弥合概念化过程中产生的知识领域的界限,有助于整合构成该领域的不同学科。该类型学确认了一个由六个综合学科(转型、社会创业、设计、理论、领土开发和治理)以及三个新兴集群组成的矩阵,一个与人口挑战有关的人类集群和两个汇集了社会技术和可持续发展目标(SDGs)具体方面的中心集群。这种分类提供了该领域当前的知识结构,汇集了与不同学术团体相关的出版物,并提供了清晰度和更易于管理的方法,以处理在设计和证实有关社会创新的系统研究和未来研究时所面临的大量信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A typology of social innovation: A comparative study of clustering methodologies

This study offers a typology of the Social Innovation (SI) field. A sample of 5,152 documents from the Scopus database is screened using a clustering process. Using measures for inferring similarities from co-occurrence data, we identified the main themes addressed in the field, presenting a collection of keywords structured into clusters and categories. Bibliographic coupling and co-citation clustering find significant related documents and the VOS algorithm maps two sets of relevant clusters. The maps of these bibliometric analyses were contrasted through an analytical process identifying and classifying the research questions in each. This combined methodology proposes a typology that contributes to the integration of the different disciplines that structure the field by bridging the boundaries of the knowledge areas generated during the conceptualisation process. The typology confirms a matrix of six consolidated disciplines (transformation, social entrepreneurship, design, theory, territorial development, and governance) as well as three emerging clusters, a human cluster related to demographic challenges and two central sets bringing together specific aspects of social technologies and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This classification provides a picture of the current intellectual structure of the field, pulling together publications relevant to the different academic communities and providing clarity and a more manageable approach to handling the large volume of information faced when designing and substantiating systematic studies and future research on SI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal (IEMJ) publishes high quality manuscripts dealing with entrepreneurship, broadly defined, and the management of entrepreneurial organizations. The journal will expand the study of entrepreneurship and management by publishing innovative articles based on different perspectives using a variety of methodological approaches and showing the practical implications of the research for its readership. IEMJ is unique; providing a multi-disciplinary forum for researchers, scholars, consultants, entrepreneurs, businessmen, managers and practitioners in the field of entrepreneurship. The journal covers the relationship between management and entrepreneurship including both conceptual and empirical papers, leading to an improvement in the understanding of international entrepreneurial perspectives of the organisations concerned. Entrepreneurial studies are important in creating new economic activity that in turn increases innovation, employment, economic wealth and growth. The journal focuses on the diverse and complex characteristics of entrepreneurship in SMEs and large companies in local, regional, national or international markets that lead to competitiveness in the face of the effects of globalization. Though preference will be given to manuscripts that are international in scope, papers focused on domestic contexts and issues are welcome also, in order to facilitate the sharing of knowledge and potential generalizability of findings worldwide. IEMJ will publish original papers which contribute to the advancement of the field of entrepreneurship and the interface between management and entrepreneurship, as well as articles on business corporate strategy and government economic policy. On occasions, the journal will also feature case studies of successful firms or other cases having important practical implications. The journal places great emphasis on the quality of the papers it publishes. Submission of a paper will imply that it contains original unpublished work and is not being submitted for publication elsewhere. Officially cited as: Int Entrep Manag J
期刊最新文献
The effect of spouses on the entrepreneurial gender gap Dark triad personality, motivational dynamics and nascent entrepreneurs entrepreneurial intentions: cross-country comparison Are corporate affiliations conducive to nascent entrepreneurship? From innovation to impact: unraveling the complexities of entrepreneurship in the digital age Longitudinal analysis of gender differences regarding entrepreneurial resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1