什么原因导致康复护理入院延迟?结构估算法

Jing Dong, Berk Görgülü, Vahid Sarhangian
{"title":"什么原因导致康复护理入院延迟?结构估算法","authors":"Jing Dong, Berk Görgülü, Vahid Sarhangian","doi":"10.1287/msom.2022.0377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: Delays in admission to rehabilitation care can adversely impact patient outcomes. In addition, delayed patients keep occupying their acute care beds, making them unavailable for incoming patients. Admission delays are mainly caused by a lack of rehabilitation bed capacity and the time required to plan for rehabilitation activities, which we refer to as processing times. Because of non-standard bed allocation decisions and data limitations in practice, quantifying the magnitude of the two sources of delays can be technically challenging yet critical to the design of evidence-based interventions to reduce delays. We propose an empirical approach to understanding the contributions of the two sources of delays when only a single (combined) measure of admission delay is available. Methodology/results: We propose a hidden Markov model (HMM) to estimate the unobserved processing times and the status-quo bed allocation policy. Our estimation results quantify the magnitude of processing times versus capacity-driven delays and provide insights into factors impacting the bed allocation decision. We validate our estimated policy using a queueing model of patient flow and find that ignoring processing times or using simple bed allocation policies can lead to highly inaccurate delay estimates. In contrast, our estimated policy allows for accurate evaluation of different operational interventions. We find that reducing processing times can be highly effective in reducing admission delays and bed-blocking costs. In addition, allowing early transfer—whereby patients can complete some of their processing requirements in the rehabilitation unit—can significantly reduce admission delays, with only a small increase in rehab LOS. Managerial implications: Our study demonstrates the importance of quantifying different sources of delays in the design of effective operational interventions for reducing delays in admission to rehabilitation care. The proposed estimation framework can be applied in other transition-of-care settings with personalized capacity allocation decisions and hidden processing delays.History: This paper was selected for Fast Track in the M&SOM journal from the 2022 MSOM Healthcare SIG Conference.Funding: J. Dong was supported in part by the National Science Foundation [Grant CMMI-1762544]. V. Sarhangian was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [Grant RGPIN-2018-04518] and the Connaught Fund.Supplemental Material: The e-companion is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0377 .","PeriodicalId":501267,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","volume":"152 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Causes Delays in Admission to Rehabilitation Care? A Structural Estimation Approach\",\"authors\":\"Jing Dong, Berk Görgülü, Vahid Sarhangian\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/msom.2022.0377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problem definition: Delays in admission to rehabilitation care can adversely impact patient outcomes. In addition, delayed patients keep occupying their acute care beds, making them unavailable for incoming patients. Admission delays are mainly caused by a lack of rehabilitation bed capacity and the time required to plan for rehabilitation activities, which we refer to as processing times. Because of non-standard bed allocation decisions and data limitations in practice, quantifying the magnitude of the two sources of delays can be technically challenging yet critical to the design of evidence-based interventions to reduce delays. We propose an empirical approach to understanding the contributions of the two sources of delays when only a single (combined) measure of admission delay is available. Methodology/results: We propose a hidden Markov model (HMM) to estimate the unobserved processing times and the status-quo bed allocation policy. Our estimation results quantify the magnitude of processing times versus capacity-driven delays and provide insights into factors impacting the bed allocation decision. We validate our estimated policy using a queueing model of patient flow and find that ignoring processing times or using simple bed allocation policies can lead to highly inaccurate delay estimates. In contrast, our estimated policy allows for accurate evaluation of different operational interventions. We find that reducing processing times can be highly effective in reducing admission delays and bed-blocking costs. In addition, allowing early transfer—whereby patients can complete some of their processing requirements in the rehabilitation unit—can significantly reduce admission delays, with only a small increase in rehab LOS. Managerial implications: Our study demonstrates the importance of quantifying different sources of delays in the design of effective operational interventions for reducing delays in admission to rehabilitation care. The proposed estimation framework can be applied in other transition-of-care settings with personalized capacity allocation decisions and hidden processing delays.History: This paper was selected for Fast Track in the M&SOM journal from the 2022 MSOM Healthcare SIG Conference.Funding: J. Dong was supported in part by the National Science Foundation [Grant CMMI-1762544]. V. Sarhangian was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [Grant RGPIN-2018-04518] and the Connaught Fund.Supplemental Material: The e-companion is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0377 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":501267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题的定义:延迟康复护理入院会对患者的治疗效果产生不利影响。此外,延迟入院的病人会一直占用急症护理床位,导致无法为新入院的病人提供床位。入院延误的主要原因是康复病床容量不足,以及康复活动计划所需的时间(我们称之为处理时间)。由于床位分配决策的非标准性和实践中数据的局限性,量化这两种延误来源的严重程度在技术上具有挑战性,但对于设计循证干预措施以减少延误至关重要。我们提出了一种实证方法,以了解在只有单一(综合)入院延迟测量指标的情况下,两种延迟来源的贡献。方法/结果:我们提出了一个隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)来估计未观察到的处理时间和现状床位分配政策。我们的估算结果量化了处理时间与容量驱动延迟的大小,并提供了对影响床位分配决策的因素的见解。我们使用病人流排队模型验证了我们的估计政策,发现忽略处理时间或使用简单的床位分配政策会导致非常不准确的延迟估计。相比之下,我们估算的政策可以对不同的运营干预措施进行准确评估。我们发现,缩短处理时间可以非常有效地减少入院延迟和床位阻塞成本。此外,允许提前转院--即患者可以在康复科完成部分处理要求--可以显著减少入院延迟,而康复科的 LOS 只需少量增加。管理意义:我们的研究表明,在设计有效的操作干预措施以减少康复护理入院延误的过程中,量化不同的延误来源非常重要。提出的估算框架可应用于其他具有个性化容量分配决策和隐性处理延迟的护理过渡环境:本文入选 2022 年 MSOM 医疗保健 SIG 会议的 M&SOM 期刊快速通道:J. Dong部分获得了美国国家科学基金会[Grant CMMI-1762544]的资助。V. Sarhangian得到了加拿大自然科学与工程研究委员会[RGPIN-2018-04518号基金]和康诺基金的部分资助:电子版可在 https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0377 上查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Causes Delays in Admission to Rehabilitation Care? A Structural Estimation Approach
Problem definition: Delays in admission to rehabilitation care can adversely impact patient outcomes. In addition, delayed patients keep occupying their acute care beds, making them unavailable for incoming patients. Admission delays are mainly caused by a lack of rehabilitation bed capacity and the time required to plan for rehabilitation activities, which we refer to as processing times. Because of non-standard bed allocation decisions and data limitations in practice, quantifying the magnitude of the two sources of delays can be technically challenging yet critical to the design of evidence-based interventions to reduce delays. We propose an empirical approach to understanding the contributions of the two sources of delays when only a single (combined) measure of admission delay is available. Methodology/results: We propose a hidden Markov model (HMM) to estimate the unobserved processing times and the status-quo bed allocation policy. Our estimation results quantify the magnitude of processing times versus capacity-driven delays and provide insights into factors impacting the bed allocation decision. We validate our estimated policy using a queueing model of patient flow and find that ignoring processing times or using simple bed allocation policies can lead to highly inaccurate delay estimates. In contrast, our estimated policy allows for accurate evaluation of different operational interventions. We find that reducing processing times can be highly effective in reducing admission delays and bed-blocking costs. In addition, allowing early transfer—whereby patients can complete some of their processing requirements in the rehabilitation unit—can significantly reduce admission delays, with only a small increase in rehab LOS. Managerial implications: Our study demonstrates the importance of quantifying different sources of delays in the design of effective operational interventions for reducing delays in admission to rehabilitation care. The proposed estimation framework can be applied in other transition-of-care settings with personalized capacity allocation decisions and hidden processing delays.History: This paper was selected for Fast Track in the M&SOM journal from the 2022 MSOM Healthcare SIG Conference.Funding: J. Dong was supported in part by the National Science Foundation [Grant CMMI-1762544]. V. Sarhangian was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [Grant RGPIN-2018-04518] and the Connaught Fund.Supplemental Material: The e-companion is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0377 .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Competition in Optimal Stopping: Behavioral Insights Information Dependency in Mitigating Disruption Cascades Adaptive Two-Stage Stochastic Programming with an Analysis on Capacity Expansion Planning Problem Demand Equilibria in Spatial Service Systems Optimal Salesforce Compensation with General Demand and Operational Considerations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1