过度多样化效应:增强多重(与单一)他人偏好的感知异质性

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-07 DOI:10.1002/jcpy.1403
Ritesh Saini, Dian Wang, Haipeng (Allan) Chen
{"title":"过度多样化效应:增强多重(与单一)他人偏好的感知异质性","authors":"Ritesh Saini, Dian Wang, Haipeng (Allan) Chen","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumers often make decisions for multiple-others when they do not know each one's true preferences. Under such circumstances, we demonstrate perceptions of enhanced preference heterogeneity for multiple-others, relative to the perceived preference of single-others. As a result, choices for multiple-others are more diversified than those for single-others. We attribute this effect to the perceived uniqueness of others in the multiple-other setting. Notably, when others are perceived as particularly unique, the inclination toward over-diversification intensifies. However, this diversification often leads to choices that do not align with the true preferences of the individuals, causing potential mismatches in demand and supply. We conclude with a discussion on the implications of these findings for managers and suggest avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":48365,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The over-diversification effect: Enhancement in perceived heterogeneity of multiple (vs. single)-others' preferences\",\"authors\":\"Ritesh Saini, Dian Wang, Haipeng (Allan) Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcpy.1403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consumers often make decisions for multiple-others when they do not know each one's true preferences. Under such circumstances, we demonstrate perceptions of enhanced preference heterogeneity for multiple-others, relative to the perceived preference of single-others. As a result, choices for multiple-others are more diversified than those for single-others. We attribute this effect to the perceived uniqueness of others in the multiple-other setting. Notably, when others are perceived as particularly unique, the inclination toward over-diversification intensifies. However, this diversification often leads to choices that do not align with the true preferences of the individuals, causing potential mismatches in demand and supply. We conclude with a discussion on the implications of these findings for managers and suggest avenues for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1403\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

消费者在不了解每个人的真实偏好时,往往会为多个他人做出决策。在这种情况下,相对于单个他人的感知偏好,我们会发现对多个他人的感知偏好异质性更强。因此,与单个他人相比,多个他人的选择更加多样化。我们将这种效应归因于在多人环境中感知到的他人的独特性。值得注意的是,当他人被认为特别独特时,过度多样化的倾向就会加强。然而,这种多样化往往会导致与个人真实偏好不一致的选择,从而造成潜在的供需错配。最后,我们讨论了这些发现对管理者的影响,并提出了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The over-diversification effect: Enhancement in perceived heterogeneity of multiple (vs. single)-others' preferences
Consumers often make decisions for multiple-others when they do not know each one's true preferences. Under such circumstances, we demonstrate perceptions of enhanced preference heterogeneity for multiple-others, relative to the perceived preference of single-others. As a result, choices for multiple-others are more diversified than those for single-others. We attribute this effect to the perceived uniqueness of others in the multiple-other setting. Notably, when others are perceived as particularly unique, the inclination toward over-diversification intensifies. However, this diversification often leads to choices that do not align with the true preferences of the individuals, causing potential mismatches in demand and supply. We conclude with a discussion on the implications of these findings for managers and suggest avenues for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Psychology is devoted to psychological perspectives on the study of the consumer. It publishes articles that contribute both theoretically and empirically to an understanding of psychological processes underlying consumers thoughts, feelings, decisions, and behaviors. Areas of emphasis include, but are not limited to, consumer judgment and decision processes, attitude formation and change, reactions to persuasive communications, affective experiences, consumer information processing, consumer-brand relationships, affective, cognitive, and motivational determinants of consumer behavior, family and group decision processes, and cultural and individual differences in consumer behavior.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Refining and expanding applications of Moral Foundations Theory in consumer psychology Message framing to enhance consumer compliance with disease detection communication for prevention: The moderating role of age AI‐induced dehumanization The model‐sizing dilemma: The use of varied female model sizes helps the impressions of brand values but hurts shopping ease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1