剖腹产对卵胞浆内单精子注射结果的影响。

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-12 DOI:10.5653/cerm.2023.06163
Suzan Atteya Gewida, Mohamed Salah Eldeen Abd Rabbo, Mohammed Abd Elmoety El Samra, Hesham Mahmoud Adel Abdel Moneim
{"title":"剖腹产对卵胞浆内单精子注射结果的影响。","authors":"Suzan Atteya Gewida, Mohamed Salah Eldeen Abd Rabbo, Mohammed Abd Elmoety El Samra, Hesham Mahmoud Adel Abdel Moneim","doi":"10.5653/cerm.2023.06163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to investigate the impact of previous delivery mode on pregnancy outcomes in patients with secondary infertility after frozen-thawed embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included 140 patients experiencing secondary infertility. Of these, 70 patients had a previous cesarean delivery (CD), while the remaining 70 patients had a previous normal vaginal delivery (NVD). The primary outcome was the implantation rate. The secondary outcomes included rates of clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparison of all fertility outcomes between the two groups revealed no statistically significant differences. The implantation rate was 40.4% in the CD group and 41.7% in the NVD group (p=0.842). The clinical pregnancy rate was 50% in the CD group and 49.3% in the NVD group (p=0.932), while the chemical pregnancy rate was 14.6% in the CD group and 19% in the NVD group (p=0.591). The miscarriage rates in the CD and NVD groups were 20% and 17.6%, respectively (p=0.803). One case of tubal ectopic pregnancy occurred in the NVD group (1.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mode of prior delivery did not significantly impact pregnancy outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":46409,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM","volume":" ","pages":"63-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of prior cesarean delivery on the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.\",\"authors\":\"Suzan Atteya Gewida, Mohamed Salah Eldeen Abd Rabbo, Mohammed Abd Elmoety El Samra, Hesham Mahmoud Adel Abdel Moneim\",\"doi\":\"10.5653/cerm.2023.06163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to investigate the impact of previous delivery mode on pregnancy outcomes in patients with secondary infertility after frozen-thawed embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included 140 patients experiencing secondary infertility. Of these, 70 patients had a previous cesarean delivery (CD), while the remaining 70 patients had a previous normal vaginal delivery (NVD). The primary outcome was the implantation rate. The secondary outcomes included rates of clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparison of all fertility outcomes between the two groups revealed no statistically significant differences. The implantation rate was 40.4% in the CD group and 41.7% in the NVD group (p=0.842). The clinical pregnancy rate was 50% in the CD group and 49.3% in the NVD group (p=0.932), while the chemical pregnancy rate was 14.6% in the CD group and 19% in the NVD group (p=0.591). The miscarriage rates in the CD and NVD groups were 20% and 17.6%, respectively (p=0.803). One case of tubal ectopic pregnancy occurred in the NVD group (1.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mode of prior delivery did not significantly impact pregnancy outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"63-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914504/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2023.06163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2023.06163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨冷冻解冻胚胎移植后,以往分娩方式对继发性不孕患者妊娠结局的影响:这项前瞻性观察研究纳入了 140 名继发性不孕患者。其中,70 名患者曾进行过剖宫产(CD),其余 70 名患者曾进行过正常阴道分娩(NVD)。主要结果是植入率。次要结果包括临床妊娠率、化学妊娠率、流产率和宫外孕率:两组所有生育结果的比较结果显示,差异无统计学意义。CD组的植入率为40.4%,NVD组为41.7%(P=0.842)。CD组的临床妊娠率为50%,NVD组为49.3%(P=0.932),而CD组的化学妊娠率为14.6%,NVD组为19%(P=0.591)。CD组和NVD组的流产率分别为20%和17.6%(P=0.803)。NVD组有一例输卵管异位妊娠(1.4%):结论:分娩方式对冷冻解冻胚胎移植后的妊娠结局没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of prior cesarean delivery on the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the impact of previous delivery mode on pregnancy outcomes in patients with secondary infertility after frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Methods: This prospective observational study included 140 patients experiencing secondary infertility. Of these, 70 patients had a previous cesarean delivery (CD), while the remaining 70 patients had a previous normal vaginal delivery (NVD). The primary outcome was the implantation rate. The secondary outcomes included rates of clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy.

Results: The comparison of all fertility outcomes between the two groups revealed no statistically significant differences. The implantation rate was 40.4% in the CD group and 41.7% in the NVD group (p=0.842). The clinical pregnancy rate was 50% in the CD group and 49.3% in the NVD group (p=0.932), while the chemical pregnancy rate was 14.6% in the CD group and 19% in the NVD group (p=0.591). The miscarriage rates in the CD and NVD groups were 20% and 17.6%, respectively (p=0.803). One case of tubal ectopic pregnancy occurred in the NVD group (1.4%).

Conclusion: The mode of prior delivery did not significantly impact pregnancy outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Amlodipine in the HRT cycle for frozen embryo transfer to correct uterine artery resistance in women with prior implantation failure: a randomized controlled trial Should testicular sperm retrieval be implemented for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in all patients with severe oligozoospermia or cryptozoospermia? The impact of oxidation-reduction potential in follicular fluid on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes. Endometrial microbiome in reproductive failure: The possibility of metagenomic analysis. Comparative analysis of conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome, tubal factor infertility, and unexplained infertility whose partners exhibit normal semen parameters: A retrospective study of sibling oocytes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1