实施临床决策支持工具,改善体育锻炼。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000714
Margaret M McCarthy, Adam Szerencsy, Leslie Taza-Rocano, Stephanie Hopkins, Devin Mann, Gail D'Eramo Melkus, Allison Vorderstrasse, Stuart D Katz
{"title":"实施临床决策支持工具,改善体育锻炼。","authors":"Margaret M McCarthy, Adam Szerencsy, Leslie Taza-Rocano, Stephanie Hopkins, Devin Mann, Gail D'Eramo Melkus, Allison Vorderstrasse, Stuart D Katz","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, only about half of U.S. adults achieve current physical activity guidelines. Routine physical activity is not regularly assessed, nor are patients routinely counseled by their healthcare provider on achieving recommended levels. The three-question physical activity vital sign (PAVS) was developed to assess physical activity duration and intensity and identify adults not meeting physical activity guidelines. Clinical decision support provided via a best practice advisory in an electronic health record (EHR) system can be triggered as a prompt, reminding healthcare providers to implement the best practice intervention when appropriate. Remote patient monitoring of physical activity can provide objective data in the EHR.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of embedding the PAVS and a triggered best practice advisor into the EHR in an ambulatory preventive cardiology practice setting to alert providers to patients reporting low physical activity and prompt healthcare providers to counsel these patients as needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three components based in the EHR were integrated for the purpose of this study: Patients completed the PAVS through their electronic patient portal prior to an office visit, a best practice advisory was created to prompt providers to counsel patients who reported low levels of physical activity, and remote patient monitoring via Fitbit synced to the EHR provided objective physical activity data. The intervention was pilot-tested in the Epic EHR for 1 year (July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022). Qualitative feedback on the intervention from both providers and patients was obtained at the completion of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Monthly assessments of the use of the PAVS and best practice advisory and remote patient monitoring were completed. Patients' completion of the PAVS varied from 35% to 48% per month. The best practice advisory was signed by providers between 2% and 65% and was acknowledged by 2%-22% per month. The majority (58%) of patients were able to sync a Fitbit device to their EHR for remote monitoring.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although uptake of each component needs improvement, this pilot demonstrated the feasibility of incorporating a physical activity promotion intervention into the EHR. Qualitative feedback provided guidance for future implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"216-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11039363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Improve Physical Activity.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret M McCarthy, Adam Szerencsy, Leslie Taza-Rocano, Stephanie Hopkins, Devin Mann, Gail D'Eramo Melkus, Allison Vorderstrasse, Stuart D Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, only about half of U.S. adults achieve current physical activity guidelines. Routine physical activity is not regularly assessed, nor are patients routinely counseled by their healthcare provider on achieving recommended levels. The three-question physical activity vital sign (PAVS) was developed to assess physical activity duration and intensity and identify adults not meeting physical activity guidelines. Clinical decision support provided via a best practice advisory in an electronic health record (EHR) system can be triggered as a prompt, reminding healthcare providers to implement the best practice intervention when appropriate. Remote patient monitoring of physical activity can provide objective data in the EHR.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of embedding the PAVS and a triggered best practice advisor into the EHR in an ambulatory preventive cardiology practice setting to alert providers to patients reporting low physical activity and prompt healthcare providers to counsel these patients as needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three components based in the EHR were integrated for the purpose of this study: Patients completed the PAVS through their electronic patient portal prior to an office visit, a best practice advisory was created to prompt providers to counsel patients who reported low levels of physical activity, and remote patient monitoring via Fitbit synced to the EHR provided objective physical activity data. The intervention was pilot-tested in the Epic EHR for 1 year (July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022). Qualitative feedback on the intervention from both providers and patients was obtained at the completion of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Monthly assessments of the use of the PAVS and best practice advisory and remote patient monitoring were completed. Patients' completion of the PAVS varied from 35% to 48% per month. The best practice advisory was signed by providers between 2% and 65% and was acknowledged by 2%-22% per month. The majority (58%) of patients were able to sync a Fitbit device to their EHR for remote monitoring.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although uptake of each component needs improvement, this pilot demonstrated the feasibility of incorporating a physical activity promotion intervention into the EHR. Qualitative feedback provided guidance for future implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"216-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11039363/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000714\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,只有大约一半的美国成年人达到了现行的体育锻炼指导标准。常规体育锻炼并没有得到定期评估,患者也没有得到医疗服务提供者关于达到建议水平的常规指导。体力活动生命体征(PAVS)由三个问题组成,用于评估体力活动的持续时间和强度,并识别未达到体力活动指南要求的成年人。通过电子健康记录(EHR)系统中的最佳实践建议提供的临床决策支持可以触发提示,提醒医疗服务提供者在适当的时候实施最佳实践干预。远程监测患者的体力活动可在电子病历中提供客观数据:本研究旨在评估在门诊预防性心脏病诊疗环境中将患者体力活动监测系统和触发式最佳实践顾问嵌入电子病历的可行性和临床实用性,以提醒医疗服务提供者注意报告体力活动不足的患者,并提示医疗服务提供者根据需要为这些患者提供咨询服务:本研究整合了电子病历中的三个组件:患者在就诊前通过电子患者门户完成 PAVS;创建最佳实践建议,以提示医疗服务提供者为报告体力活动水平低的患者提供咨询;通过与电子病历同步的 Fitbit 进行远程患者监测,提供客观的体力活动数据。该干预措施在 Epic EHR 中进行了为期一年(2021 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日)的试点测试。研究结束后,从医疗服务提供者和患者处获得了对干预措施的定性反馈:结果:完成了对 PAVS 使用情况、最佳实践咨询和远程患者监测的月度评估。患者每月完成 PAVS 的比例从 35% 到 48% 不等。每月有 2% 至 65% 的医疗服务提供者签署了最佳实践建议,有 2% 至 22% 的医疗服务提供者确认了最佳实践建议。大多数患者(58%)都能将 Fitbit 设备同步到电子病历中进行远程监测:讨论:尽管各组成部分的使用率有待提高,但该试点项目证明了在电子病历中纳入促进锻炼干预措施的可行性。定性反馈为今后的实施提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementing a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Improve Physical Activity.

Background: Currently, only about half of U.S. adults achieve current physical activity guidelines. Routine physical activity is not regularly assessed, nor are patients routinely counseled by their healthcare provider on achieving recommended levels. The three-question physical activity vital sign (PAVS) was developed to assess physical activity duration and intensity and identify adults not meeting physical activity guidelines. Clinical decision support provided via a best practice advisory in an electronic health record (EHR) system can be triggered as a prompt, reminding healthcare providers to implement the best practice intervention when appropriate. Remote patient monitoring of physical activity can provide objective data in the EHR.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of embedding the PAVS and a triggered best practice advisor into the EHR in an ambulatory preventive cardiology practice setting to alert providers to patients reporting low physical activity and prompt healthcare providers to counsel these patients as needed.

Methods: Three components based in the EHR were integrated for the purpose of this study: Patients completed the PAVS through their electronic patient portal prior to an office visit, a best practice advisory was created to prompt providers to counsel patients who reported low levels of physical activity, and remote patient monitoring via Fitbit synced to the EHR provided objective physical activity data. The intervention was pilot-tested in the Epic EHR for 1 year (July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022). Qualitative feedback on the intervention from both providers and patients was obtained at the completion of the study.

Results: Monthly assessments of the use of the PAVS and best practice advisory and remote patient monitoring were completed. Patients' completion of the PAVS varied from 35% to 48% per month. The best practice advisory was signed by providers between 2% and 65% and was acknowledged by 2%-22% per month. The majority (58%) of patients were able to sync a Fitbit device to their EHR for remote monitoring.

Discussion: Although uptake of each component needs improvement, this pilot demonstrated the feasibility of incorporating a physical activity promotion intervention into the EHR. Qualitative feedback provided guidance for future implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
期刊最新文献
Preparing PhD Students for Tenure-Track Faculty Positions. Cognitive Interventions in Heart Failure Segue to Thoughts on Symptom Science in Nursing Research. Health Implications of Black Identity Among Latinos: A Call for Afro-Latina Representation in Maternal Child Health Research. In Search of Nursing Science. Nursing Science and the Law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1