信息标识在阻止游客破坏行为方面的效果

IF 3.6 3区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jort.2023.100731
Tzeng-Hua Yang
{"title":"信息标识在阻止游客破坏行为方面的效果","authors":"Tzeng-Hua Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jort.2023.100731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Visitors' depreciative behavior is a problematic issue for tourist management. Management authorities often attempted to prevent these unwelcome behaviors by creating information signs. However, are these signs effective? What types of information content and color usage produce better effects? These questions have yet to be critically examined. In this study, visitors not following paved paths and treading over vegetation are recorded in five experimental settings: one control setting with no signs and four other scenarios each with different texts and colors – all with hidden cameras monitoring results. The results suggest that information signs significantly reduce visitor depreciative behavior to vegetation, and punitive warning signs are more effective than positive educational signs. In addition, \"cold\" signs with blue backgrounds achieved better results than \"warm\" signs with red backgrounds. The study also revealed that when one does not obey the signs, others will follow; younger people were more likely to commit deviant depreciative behavior.</p></div><div><h3>Management implications</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Information signs effectively reduce visitor vandalism</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Punitive warning signs produce a more favorable outcome than positive educational signs.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>“Cold” signs with blue backgrounds achieved better results than “warm” signs with red backgrounds.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>When one does not obey information signs, others will follow.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Younger people show the most deviant vandalism behavior.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":46931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100731"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078023001287/pdfft?md5=142497ada32b05b135a08d866923394e&pid=1-s2.0-S2213078023001287-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of information signs in deterring visitor vandalism\",\"authors\":\"Tzeng-Hua Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jort.2023.100731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Visitors' depreciative behavior is a problematic issue for tourist management. Management authorities often attempted to prevent these unwelcome behaviors by creating information signs. However, are these signs effective? What types of information content and color usage produce better effects? These questions have yet to be critically examined. In this study, visitors not following paved paths and treading over vegetation are recorded in five experimental settings: one control setting with no signs and four other scenarios each with different texts and colors – all with hidden cameras monitoring results. The results suggest that information signs significantly reduce visitor depreciative behavior to vegetation, and punitive warning signs are more effective than positive educational signs. In addition, \\\"cold\\\" signs with blue backgrounds achieved better results than \\\"warm\\\" signs with red backgrounds. The study also revealed that when one does not obey the signs, others will follow; younger people were more likely to commit deviant depreciative behavior.</p></div><div><h3>Management implications</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Information signs effectively reduce visitor vandalism</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Punitive warning signs produce a more favorable outcome than positive educational signs.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>“Cold” signs with blue backgrounds achieved better results than “warm” signs with red backgrounds.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>When one does not obey information signs, others will follow.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Younger people show the most deviant vandalism behavior.</p></span></li></ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100731\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078023001287/pdfft?md5=142497ada32b05b135a08d866923394e&pid=1-s2.0-S2213078023001287-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078023001287\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078023001287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

游客的贬损行为是旅游管理的一个难题。管理部门往往试图通过设立信息标识来防止这些不受欢迎的行为。然而,这些标识是否有效?什么样的信息内容和颜色使用能产生更好的效果?这些问题还有待认真研究。本研究在五个实验场景中记录了游客不走甬路和踩踏植被的行为:一个是没有标识的对照场景,另外四个场景各有不同的文字和颜色,所有场景都有隐藏摄像机监控结果。结果表明,信息标识能明显减少游客对植被的破坏行为,惩罚性警告标识比正面教育标识更有效。此外,蓝色背景的 "冷 "标识比红色背景的 "暖 "标识效果更好。管理启示--信息标识有效减少游客的破坏行为--惩罚性警示标识比正面教育标识更能产生良好效果--蓝色背景的 "冷 "标识比红色背景的 "暖 "标识效果更好--当一个人不遵守信息标识时,其他人也会效仿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of information signs in deterring visitor vandalism

Visitors' depreciative behavior is a problematic issue for tourist management. Management authorities often attempted to prevent these unwelcome behaviors by creating information signs. However, are these signs effective? What types of information content and color usage produce better effects? These questions have yet to be critically examined. In this study, visitors not following paved paths and treading over vegetation are recorded in five experimental settings: one control setting with no signs and four other scenarios each with different texts and colors – all with hidden cameras monitoring results. The results suggest that information signs significantly reduce visitor depreciative behavior to vegetation, and punitive warning signs are more effective than positive educational signs. In addition, "cold" signs with blue backgrounds achieved better results than "warm" signs with red backgrounds. The study also revealed that when one does not obey the signs, others will follow; younger people were more likely to commit deviant depreciative behavior.

Management implications

  • Information signs effectively reduce visitor vandalism

  • Punitive warning signs produce a more favorable outcome than positive educational signs.

  • “Cold” signs with blue backgrounds achieved better results than “warm” signs with red backgrounds.

  • When one does not obey information signs, others will follow.

  • Younger people show the most deviant vandalism behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism offers a dedicated outlet for research relevant to social sciences and natural resources. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research on all aspects of outdoor recreation planning and management, covering the entire spectrum of settings from wilderness to urban outdoor recreation opportunities. It also focuses on new products and findings in nature based tourism and park management. JORT is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal, articles may focus on any aspect of theory, method, or concept of outdoor recreation research, planning or management, and interdisciplinary work is especially welcome, and may be of a theoretical and/or a case study nature. Depending on the topic of investigation, articles may be positioned within one academic discipline, or draw from several disciplines in an integrative manner, with overarching relevance to social sciences and natural resources. JORT is international in scope and attracts scholars from all reaches of the world to facilitate the exchange of ideas. As such, the journal enhances understanding of scientific knowledge, empirical results, and practitioners'' needs. Therefore in JORT each article is accompanied by an executive summary, written by the editors or authors, highlighting the planning and management relevant aspects of the article.
期刊最新文献
Dual trust, emotional bond, and tourists’ on-site pro-environmental behavior at nature-based destinations: Extending norm-activation theory from the perspective of social dilemma Navigating complexities in forest visitation modelling: Intersecting environmental, social, and public health factors during the COVID-19 pandemic Walking on sunshine: Application of a choice experiment to understand impacts of climate change on tourism attractions Towards a digital ranger: Using data from outdoor platforms to detect rule violations in protected areas and improve visitor management The influence of trekkers’ personal and subjective norms on their pro-environmental behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1