数字金融使用对中国居民收入不平等的影响:基于CHFS数据的实证分析

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Asian Economics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101706
Yunping Hao , Bing Zhang
{"title":"数字金融使用对中国居民收入不平等的影响:基于CHFS数据的实证分析","authors":"Yunping Hao ,&nbsp;Bing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the relationship between digital financial use and resident’s income inequality based on 2019 CHFS<span> data. We argue that digital finance usage impacts resident’s income inequality both directly and indirectly. To examine the impact of digital financial use on resident’s income inequality and explore transmission mechanisms, including differences across regions, occupations, work types, and education levels, we employ ordinary least squares. Our results reveal that digital payments, digital money management, digital funds, and credit card usage have a positive mitigating effect on resident’s income inequality. Digital financial services have a significant positive impact on resident’s income inequality in southern, northern, coastal, and inland regions. Among purely agricultural farmers, digital payments, digital money management, and credit cards' effects are more pronounced than purely non-agricultural farmers. The use of digital financial also reduces resident’s income inequality among different work types, including institutional, state-owned, self-employed, and private enterprise. Family entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial frequency, and working outside the home are important channels through which digital financial services mitigate resident’s income inequality. Digital payments and credit cards reduce resident’s wage income inequality, while digital money management and digital funds are effective in reducing resident’s property income inequality.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Economics","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 101706"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of digital financial usage on resident’s income inequality in China: An empirical analysis based on CHFS data\",\"authors\":\"Yunping Hao ,&nbsp;Bing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the relationship between digital financial use and resident’s income inequality based on 2019 CHFS<span> data. We argue that digital finance usage impacts resident’s income inequality both directly and indirectly. To examine the impact of digital financial use on resident’s income inequality and explore transmission mechanisms, including differences across regions, occupations, work types, and education levels, we employ ordinary least squares. Our results reveal that digital payments, digital money management, digital funds, and credit card usage have a positive mitigating effect on resident’s income inequality. Digital financial services have a significant positive impact on resident’s income inequality in southern, northern, coastal, and inland regions. Among purely agricultural farmers, digital payments, digital money management, and credit cards' effects are more pronounced than purely non-agricultural farmers. The use of digital financial also reduces resident’s income inequality among different work types, including institutional, state-owned, self-employed, and private enterprise. Family entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial frequency, and working outside the home are important channels through which digital financial services mitigate resident’s income inequality. Digital payments and credit cards reduce resident’s wage income inequality, while digital money management and digital funds are effective in reducing resident’s property income inequality.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asian Economics\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asian Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049007824000010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049007824000010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究基于 2019 年 CHFS 数据,调查了数字金融使用与居民收入不平等之间的关系。我们认为,数字金融的使用会直接和间接地影响居民的收入不平等。为了研究数字金融使用对居民收入不平等的影响并探索传导机制,包括不同地区、职业、工种和教育水平之间的差异,我们采用了普通最小二乘法。结果显示,数字支付、数字理财、数字基金和信用卡的使用对居民收入不平等有积极的缓解作用。在南方、北方、沿海和内陆地区,数字金融服务对居民收入不平等都有显著的正向影响。在纯农业农户中,数字支付、数字理财和信用卡的影响比纯非农业农户更明显。数字金融的使用也减少了居民在不同工作类型中的收入不平等,包括事业单位、国有企业、个体户和私营企业。家庭创业、创业频率和外出工作是数字金融服务缓解居民收入不平等的重要渠道。数字支付和信用卡减少了居民工资性收入的不平等,而数字理财和数字基金则有效减少了居民财产性收入的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of digital financial usage on resident’s income inequality in China: An empirical analysis based on CHFS data

This study investigates the relationship between digital financial use and resident’s income inequality based on 2019 CHFS data. We argue that digital finance usage impacts resident’s income inequality both directly and indirectly. To examine the impact of digital financial use on resident’s income inequality and explore transmission mechanisms, including differences across regions, occupations, work types, and education levels, we employ ordinary least squares. Our results reveal that digital payments, digital money management, digital funds, and credit card usage have a positive mitigating effect on resident’s income inequality. Digital financial services have a significant positive impact on resident’s income inequality in southern, northern, coastal, and inland regions. Among purely agricultural farmers, digital payments, digital money management, and credit cards' effects are more pronounced than purely non-agricultural farmers. The use of digital financial also reduces resident’s income inequality among different work types, including institutional, state-owned, self-employed, and private enterprise. Family entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial frequency, and working outside the home are important channels through which digital financial services mitigate resident’s income inequality. Digital payments and credit cards reduce resident’s wage income inequality, while digital money management and digital funds are effective in reducing resident’s property income inequality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Asian Economics provides a forum for publication of increasingly growing research in Asian economic studies and a unique forum for continental Asian economic studies with focus on (i) special studies in adaptive innovation paradigms in Asian economic regimes, (ii) studies relative to unique dimensions of Asian economic development paradigm, as they are investigated by researchers, (iii) comparative studies of development paradigms in other developing continents, Latin America and Africa, (iv) the emerging new pattern of comparative advantages between Asian countries and the United States and North America.
期刊最新文献
Does the application of artificial intelligence enhance the labor income share? — Evidence from China’s listed companies Pension portability, labor mobility, and regional convergence: Evidence from China Impacts and mechanisms of trade openness on government efficiency: Theory and evidence from China Clan culture, surname diversity and labor mobility Green place-based policy and inter-city divergences: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1