烧伤面积估算:具有临床实践意义的非凡历史

Gretchen J. Carrougher, Tam N. Pham
{"title":"烧伤面积估算:具有临床实践意义的非凡历史","authors":"Gretchen J. Carrougher,&nbsp;Tam N. Pham","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2023.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Determining the size of a burn injury is a critical metric in the care of the burn patient. Several long-standing methods exist to estimate burn size to include the Rule of Nines, Lund-Browder Chart, and Palmar method; all of which remain in clinical use today. Development and use of these metrics first began in the late 1800s. Understanding these clinical tools and others, with an appreciation of their development, limitations, and utility, is important for the competent burn care clinician today. This review provides an evolutional history for these metrics and use in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 47-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000014/pdfft?md5=f5f4fc6a41aca6ba00dfe9f9227d4ad1&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000014-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Burn size estimation: A remarkable history with clinical practice implications\",\"authors\":\"Gretchen J. Carrougher,&nbsp;Tam N. Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burnso.2023.12.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Determining the size of a burn injury is a critical metric in the care of the burn patient. Several long-standing methods exist to estimate burn size to include the Rule of Nines, Lund-Browder Chart, and Palmar method; all of which remain in clinical use today. Development and use of these metrics first began in the late 1800s. Understanding these clinical tools and others, with an appreciation of their development, limitations, and utility, is important for the competent burn care clinician today. This review provides an evolutional history for these metrics and use in clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 47-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000014/pdfft?md5=f5f4fc6a41aca6ba00dfe9f9227d4ad1&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000014-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定烧伤面积是烧伤病人护理中的一个关键指标。估算烧伤面积的方法由来已久,其中包括九分法、伦德-布朗德图和帕尔马法;所有这些方法至今仍在临床上使用。这些指标的开发和使用始于 19 世纪末。了解这些临床工具和其他工具,了解它们的发展、局限性和实用性,对于当今胜任烧伤护理的临床医生来说非常重要。本综述介绍了这些指标的演变历史以及在临床实践中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Burn size estimation: A remarkable history with clinical practice implications

Determining the size of a burn injury is a critical metric in the care of the burn patient. Several long-standing methods exist to estimate burn size to include the Rule of Nines, Lund-Browder Chart, and Palmar method; all of which remain in clinical use today. Development and use of these metrics first began in the late 1800s. Understanding these clinical tools and others, with an appreciation of their development, limitations, and utility, is important for the competent burn care clinician today. This review provides an evolutional history for these metrics and use in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Estimating the probability of survival of hospitalized burn patients at a tertiary hospital in Ghana The addition of lactate to SOFA score improves the prediction of mortality in patients with severe burns–A retrospective cohort study Early opioid use in acute severe burn injuries and long-term pain and quality of life Utilization of Suprathel® in delayed surgical management of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN): A case report The relationship between burn area and severity and length of stay in burn patients treated at the leading referral burn Centre in West Java, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1