{"title":"评估土壤水分胁迫引起的薄荷油含量和成分变化","authors":"Dipender Kumar , Arjita Punetha , Amir Khan , Priyanka Suryavanshi , Yogendra N.D. , R.C. Padalia","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2023.104774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In the delicate balance of plant vitality, moisture-stress emerges as a critical determinant. Its stifling impact on stomatal regulation and photosynthesis<span><span> underscores its role in shaping agronomic outcomes and essential oil production. Addressing this challenge is imperative. Hence, the present investigation intended to find out the consequence of soil moisture on essential-oils content, and composition of three mint varieties. Experiment was setup with nine treatments from which the samples were collected at different times i.e., before and after irrigation. The study revealed noticeable variations in oil content across all species of mint family under increasing soil </span>moisture stress. For instance, in </span></span><em>M. spicata</em> L., the oil content found between 0.37% and 0.57%, while in <em>M. piperita</em> L., it varied from 0.50% to 0.62%, and in <em>M. citrata</em> L., it spanned from 0.43% to 0.62% during the morning and afternoon measurements. The predominant compound in <em>M. spicata</em><span> L. was piperitone oxide (43.04%–80.94%), while </span><em>M. piperita</em><span> L. exhibited higher concentrations of menthol (31.30%–46.80%) and menthone (10.63%–26.48%). In contrast, </span><em>M. citrata</em><span> L. stood out as a notable source of linalool (0.0%–58.27%). These findings collectively indicate that variations in soil moisture-stress significantly impact both the quantity and composition of oils in these species.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of soil moisture stress induced variability in oil content and composition in mint species\",\"authors\":\"Dipender Kumar , Arjita Punetha , Amir Khan , Priyanka Suryavanshi , Yogendra N.D. , R.C. Padalia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bse.2023.104774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>In the delicate balance of plant vitality, moisture-stress emerges as a critical determinant. Its stifling impact on stomatal regulation and photosynthesis<span><span> underscores its role in shaping agronomic outcomes and essential oil production. Addressing this challenge is imperative. Hence, the present investigation intended to find out the consequence of soil moisture on essential-oils content, and composition of three mint varieties. Experiment was setup with nine treatments from which the samples were collected at different times i.e., before and after irrigation. The study revealed noticeable variations in oil content across all species of mint family under increasing soil </span>moisture stress. For instance, in </span></span><em>M. spicata</em> L., the oil content found between 0.37% and 0.57%, while in <em>M. piperita</em> L., it varied from 0.50% to 0.62%, and in <em>M. citrata</em> L., it spanned from 0.43% to 0.62% during the morning and afternoon measurements. The predominant compound in <em>M. spicata</em><span> L. was piperitone oxide (43.04%–80.94%), while </span><em>M. piperita</em><span> L. exhibited higher concentrations of menthol (31.30%–46.80%) and menthone (10.63%–26.48%). In contrast, </span><em>M. citrata</em><span> L. stood out as a notable source of linalool (0.0%–58.27%). These findings collectively indicate that variations in soil moisture-stress significantly impact both the quantity and composition of oils in these species.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197823001916\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197823001916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在植物生命力的微妙平衡中,水分胁迫是一个关键的决定因素。它对气孔调节和光合作用的抑制作用突出表明了它在影响农艺结果和精油产量方面的作用。应对这一挑战势在必行。因此,本研究旨在找出土壤湿度对三个薄荷品种的精油含量和成分的影响。实验设置了九个处理,在灌溉前和灌溉后的不同时间采集样本。研究发现,在土壤水分压力增加的情况下,薄荷家族所有品种的油含量都有明显变化。例如,在 M. spicata L.中,油含量在 0.37% 到 0.57% 之间;在 M. piperita L.中,油含量在 0.50% 到 0.62% 之间;在 M. citrata L.中,上午和下午的油含量在 0.43% 到 0.62% 之间。M. spicata L. 的主要化合物是氧化胡椒酮(43.04%-80.94%),而 M. piperita L. 的薄荷醇(31.30%-46.80%)和薄荷酮(10.63%-26.48%)浓度较高。相比之下,M. citrata L. 是芳樟醇(0.0%-58.27%)的显著来源。这些发现共同表明,土壤水分压力的变化对这些物种中油的数量和成分都有显著影响。
Assessment of soil moisture stress induced variability in oil content and composition in mint species
In the delicate balance of plant vitality, moisture-stress emerges as a critical determinant. Its stifling impact on stomatal regulation and photosynthesis underscores its role in shaping agronomic outcomes and essential oil production. Addressing this challenge is imperative. Hence, the present investigation intended to find out the consequence of soil moisture on essential-oils content, and composition of three mint varieties. Experiment was setup with nine treatments from which the samples were collected at different times i.e., before and after irrigation. The study revealed noticeable variations in oil content across all species of mint family under increasing soil moisture stress. For instance, in M. spicata L., the oil content found between 0.37% and 0.57%, while in M. piperita L., it varied from 0.50% to 0.62%, and in M. citrata L., it spanned from 0.43% to 0.62% during the morning and afternoon measurements. The predominant compound in M. spicata L. was piperitone oxide (43.04%–80.94%), while M. piperita L. exhibited higher concentrations of menthol (31.30%–46.80%) and menthone (10.63%–26.48%). In contrast, M. citrata L. stood out as a notable source of linalool (0.0%–58.27%). These findings collectively indicate that variations in soil moisture-stress significantly impact both the quantity and composition of oils in these species.
期刊介绍:
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology).
In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.