湍流的连续涡流模拟与提高分辨率的模拟方法对比

IF 1.8 Q3 MECHANICS Fluids Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.3390/fluids9010022
A. Fagbade, Stefan Heinz
{"title":"湍流的连续涡流模拟与提高分辨率的模拟方法对比","authors":"A. Fagbade, Stefan Heinz","doi":"10.3390/fluids9010022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The usual concept of simulation methods for turbulent flows is to impose a certain (partial) flow resolution. This concept becomes problematic away from limit regimes of no or an almost complete flow resolution: discrepancies between the imposed and actual flow resolution may imply an unreliable model behavior and high computational cost to compensate for simulation deficiencies. An exact mathematical approach based on variational analysis provides a solution to these problems. Minimal error continuous eddy simulation (CES) designed in this way enables simulations in which the model actively responds to variations in flow resolution by increasing or decreasing its contribution to the simulation as required. This paper presents the first application of CES methods to a moderately complex, relatively high Reynolds number turbulent flow simulation: the NASA wall-mounted hump flow. It is shown that CES performs equally well or better than almost resolving simulation methods at a little fraction of computational cost. Significant computational cost and performance advantages are reported in comparison to popular partially resolving simulation methods including detached eddy simulation and wall-modeled large eddy simulation. Characteristic features of the asymptotic flow structure are identified on the basis of CES simulations.","PeriodicalId":12397,"journal":{"name":"Fluids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous Eddy Simulation vs. Resolution-Imposing Simulation Methods for Turbulent Flows\",\"authors\":\"A. Fagbade, Stefan Heinz\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/fluids9010022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The usual concept of simulation methods for turbulent flows is to impose a certain (partial) flow resolution. This concept becomes problematic away from limit regimes of no or an almost complete flow resolution: discrepancies between the imposed and actual flow resolution may imply an unreliable model behavior and high computational cost to compensate for simulation deficiencies. An exact mathematical approach based on variational analysis provides a solution to these problems. Minimal error continuous eddy simulation (CES) designed in this way enables simulations in which the model actively responds to variations in flow resolution by increasing or decreasing its contribution to the simulation as required. This paper presents the first application of CES methods to a moderately complex, relatively high Reynolds number turbulent flow simulation: the NASA wall-mounted hump flow. It is shown that CES performs equally well or better than almost resolving simulation methods at a little fraction of computational cost. Significant computational cost and performance advantages are reported in comparison to popular partially resolving simulation methods including detached eddy simulation and wall-modeled large eddy simulation. Characteristic features of the asymptotic flow structure are identified on the basis of CES simulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fluids\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9010022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9010022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

湍流模拟方法的通常概念是施加一定的(部分)流动分辨率。在没有或几乎完全没有流动分辨率的极限状态下,这一概念就会出现问题:强加的流动分辨率与实际流动分辨率之间的差异可能意味着不可靠的模型行为和弥补模拟缺陷的高计算成本。基于变分分析的精确数学方法为这些问题提供了解决方案。采用这种方法设计的最小误差连续涡模拟(CES)可以在模拟过程中使模型主动响应流动分辨率的变化,根据需要增加或减少其对模拟的贡献。本文首次将 CES 方法应用于中度复杂、雷诺数相对较高的湍流模拟:NASA 壁挂式驼峰流。结果表明,CES 的性能与解析模拟方法相当,甚至更好,而计算成本仅为后者的一小部分。与流行的部分解析模拟方法(包括分离涡模拟和壁面建模大涡模拟)相比,CES 在计算成本和性能方面具有显著优势。在 CES 模拟的基础上,确定了渐近流动结构的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Continuous Eddy Simulation vs. Resolution-Imposing Simulation Methods for Turbulent Flows
The usual concept of simulation methods for turbulent flows is to impose a certain (partial) flow resolution. This concept becomes problematic away from limit regimes of no or an almost complete flow resolution: discrepancies between the imposed and actual flow resolution may imply an unreliable model behavior and high computational cost to compensate for simulation deficiencies. An exact mathematical approach based on variational analysis provides a solution to these problems. Minimal error continuous eddy simulation (CES) designed in this way enables simulations in which the model actively responds to variations in flow resolution by increasing or decreasing its contribution to the simulation as required. This paper presents the first application of CES methods to a moderately complex, relatively high Reynolds number turbulent flow simulation: the NASA wall-mounted hump flow. It is shown that CES performs equally well or better than almost resolving simulation methods at a little fraction of computational cost. Significant computational cost and performance advantages are reported in comparison to popular partially resolving simulation methods including detached eddy simulation and wall-modeled large eddy simulation. Characteristic features of the asymptotic flow structure are identified on the basis of CES simulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fluids
Fluids Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
326
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interrupter Technique Revisited: Building an Experimental Mechanical Ventilator to Assess Respiratory Mechanics in Large Animals Three-Dimensional Long-Wave Instability of an Evaporation/Condensation Film Valveless Pumping with an Unsteady Stenosis in an Open Tank Configuration Analytical Solution for Transient Electroosmotic and Pressure-Driven Flows in Microtubes Stochastic Equations of Hydrodynamic Theory of Plasma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1