{"title":"确定激光脉冲持续时间的强度自相关全局模型","authors":"Yufei Peng, Liqiang Liu, Lihong Hong, Zhiyuan Li","doi":"10.1088/1674-1056/ad1c57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We present a new global model of collinear autocorrelation based on second harmonic generation nonlinearity. The model is rigorously derived from the nonlinear coupled wave equation specific to the autocorrelation measurement configuration, without requiring a specific form of the incident pulse function. A rigorous solution of the nonlinear coupled wave equation is obtained in the time domain and expressed in a general analytical form. The global model fully accounts for the nonlinear interaction and propagation effects within nonlinear crystals, which are not captured by the classical local model. To assess the performance of the global model compared to the classic local model, we investigate the autocorrelation signals obtained from both models for different incident pulse waveforms and different full-width half-maximums (FWHM). When the incident pulse waveform is Lorentzian with a FWHM of 200fs, the global model predicts an autocorrelation signal FWHM of 399.9fs, while the classic local model predicts a FWHM of 331.4fs. The difference between the two models is 68.6fs, corresponding to an error of 17.2%. Similarly, for a sech-type incident pulse with a FWHM of 200fs, the global model predicts an autocorrelation signal FWHM of 343.9fs, while the local model predicts a FWHM of 308.8fs. The difference between the two models is 35.1fs, with an error of 10.2%. We further examine the behavior of the models for Lorentzian pulses with FWHMs of 100fs, 200fs, and 500fs. The differences between the global and local models are 17.1fs, 68.6fs, and 86.0fs, respectively, with errors approximately around 17%. These comparative analyses clearly demonstrate the superior accuracy of the global model in intensity autocorrelation modeling.","PeriodicalId":10253,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Physics B","volume":"45 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A global model of intensity autocorrelation to determine laser pulse duration\",\"authors\":\"Yufei Peng, Liqiang Liu, Lihong Hong, Zhiyuan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1674-1056/ad1c57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We present a new global model of collinear autocorrelation based on second harmonic generation nonlinearity. The model is rigorously derived from the nonlinear coupled wave equation specific to the autocorrelation measurement configuration, without requiring a specific form of the incident pulse function. A rigorous solution of the nonlinear coupled wave equation is obtained in the time domain and expressed in a general analytical form. The global model fully accounts for the nonlinear interaction and propagation effects within nonlinear crystals, which are not captured by the classical local model. To assess the performance of the global model compared to the classic local model, we investigate the autocorrelation signals obtained from both models for different incident pulse waveforms and different full-width half-maximums (FWHM). When the incident pulse waveform is Lorentzian with a FWHM of 200fs, the global model predicts an autocorrelation signal FWHM of 399.9fs, while the classic local model predicts a FWHM of 331.4fs. The difference between the two models is 68.6fs, corresponding to an error of 17.2%. Similarly, for a sech-type incident pulse with a FWHM of 200fs, the global model predicts an autocorrelation signal FWHM of 343.9fs, while the local model predicts a FWHM of 308.8fs. The difference between the two models is 35.1fs, with an error of 10.2%. We further examine the behavior of the models for Lorentzian pulses with FWHMs of 100fs, 200fs, and 500fs. The differences between the global and local models are 17.1fs, 68.6fs, and 86.0fs, respectively, with errors approximately around 17%. These comparative analyses clearly demonstrate the superior accuracy of the global model in intensity autocorrelation modeling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Physics B\",\"volume\":\"45 44\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Physics B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ad1c57\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Physics B","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ad1c57","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A global model of intensity autocorrelation to determine laser pulse duration
We present a new global model of collinear autocorrelation based on second harmonic generation nonlinearity. The model is rigorously derived from the nonlinear coupled wave equation specific to the autocorrelation measurement configuration, without requiring a specific form of the incident pulse function. A rigorous solution of the nonlinear coupled wave equation is obtained in the time domain and expressed in a general analytical form. The global model fully accounts for the nonlinear interaction and propagation effects within nonlinear crystals, which are not captured by the classical local model. To assess the performance of the global model compared to the classic local model, we investigate the autocorrelation signals obtained from both models for different incident pulse waveforms and different full-width half-maximums (FWHM). When the incident pulse waveform is Lorentzian with a FWHM of 200fs, the global model predicts an autocorrelation signal FWHM of 399.9fs, while the classic local model predicts a FWHM of 331.4fs. The difference between the two models is 68.6fs, corresponding to an error of 17.2%. Similarly, for a sech-type incident pulse with a FWHM of 200fs, the global model predicts an autocorrelation signal FWHM of 343.9fs, while the local model predicts a FWHM of 308.8fs. The difference between the two models is 35.1fs, with an error of 10.2%. We further examine the behavior of the models for Lorentzian pulses with FWHMs of 100fs, 200fs, and 500fs. The differences between the global and local models are 17.1fs, 68.6fs, and 86.0fs, respectively, with errors approximately around 17%. These comparative analyses clearly demonstrate the superior accuracy of the global model in intensity autocorrelation modeling.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Physics B is an international journal covering the latest developments and achievements in all branches of physics worldwide (with the exception of nuclear physics and physics of elementary particles and fields, which is covered by Chinese Physics C). It publishes original research papers and rapid communications reflecting creative and innovative achievements across the field of physics, as well as review articles covering important accomplishments in the frontiers of physics.
Subject coverage includes:
Condensed matter physics and the physics of materials
Atomic, molecular and optical physics
Statistical, nonlinear and soft matter physics
Plasma physics
Interdisciplinary physics.