中国日报》:香港 "一国两制 "的建设

IF 1.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Language and Politics Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1075/jlp.22021.den
Jiange Deng, Zhongxuan Lin
{"title":"中国日报》:香港 \"一国两制 \"的建设","authors":"Jiange Deng, Zhongxuan Lin","doi":"10.1075/jlp.22021.den","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n “One country, two systems” (OCTS) is the constitutional principle that established Hong Kong’s high degree of\n autonomy after the city’s handover from Britain to China in 1997. This study conducts the first systemic, diachronic analysis of\n the discursive construction of OCTS in Chinese news media, focusing on Beijing’s mouthpiece and public diplomacy newspaper,\n China Daily. After reviewing the tripartite representation of the principle in the literature, we identify a\n refocus from the economic to the legal-political aspect of OCTS and an increasing emphasis on the socio-cultural dimension of OCTS\n in China Daily’s news discourses from 1997 to 2020. These patterns indicated OCTS’s changing status from a ‘legitimating ideology’\n to a political principle struggling to be ‘legitimate’ in Beijing’s political discourses. Despite disputes about OCTS, we\n anticipate that Beijing and Hong Kong’s opposition will continue to abide by this principle in their future interactions.","PeriodicalId":51676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Politics","volume":"92 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The construction of Hong Kong’s “one country, two systems” in China Daily\",\"authors\":\"Jiange Deng, Zhongxuan Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jlp.22021.den\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n “One country, two systems” (OCTS) is the constitutional principle that established Hong Kong’s high degree of\\n autonomy after the city’s handover from Britain to China in 1997. This study conducts the first systemic, diachronic analysis of\\n the discursive construction of OCTS in Chinese news media, focusing on Beijing’s mouthpiece and public diplomacy newspaper,\\n China Daily. After reviewing the tripartite representation of the principle in the literature, we identify a\\n refocus from the economic to the legal-political aspect of OCTS and an increasing emphasis on the socio-cultural dimension of OCTS\\n in China Daily’s news discourses from 1997 to 2020. These patterns indicated OCTS’s changing status from a ‘legitimating ideology’\\n to a political principle struggling to be ‘legitimate’ in Beijing’s political discourses. Despite disputes about OCTS, we\\n anticipate that Beijing and Hong Kong’s opposition will continue to abide by this principle in their future interactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"volume\":\"92 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22021.den\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22021.den","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

"一国两制"(OCTS)是 1997 年香港从英国回归中国后确立香港高度自治的宪法原则。本研究首次对中国新闻媒体中 "一国两制 "的话语建构进行了系统的、非同步的分析,重点关注北京的喉舌和公共外交报纸《中国日报》。在回顾了文献中对这一原则的三方表述之后,我们发现,从 1997 年到 2020 年,《中国日报》的新闻话语将重点从经济层面转移到了法律政治层面,并越来越重视社会文化层面。这些模式表明,在北京的政治话语中,华侨城服务的地位正在从一种 "合法化意识形态 "转变为一种争取 "合法化 "的政治原则。尽管对 "华侨试验 "存在争议,但我们预计北京和香港的反对派在未来的互动中将继续遵守这一原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The construction of Hong Kong’s “one country, two systems” in China Daily
“One country, two systems” (OCTS) is the constitutional principle that established Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy after the city’s handover from Britain to China in 1997. This study conducts the first systemic, diachronic analysis of the discursive construction of OCTS in Chinese news media, focusing on Beijing’s mouthpiece and public diplomacy newspaper, China Daily. After reviewing the tripartite representation of the principle in the literature, we identify a refocus from the economic to the legal-political aspect of OCTS and an increasing emphasis on the socio-cultural dimension of OCTS in China Daily’s news discourses from 1997 to 2020. These patterns indicated OCTS’s changing status from a ‘legitimating ideology’ to a political principle struggling to be ‘legitimate’ in Beijing’s political discourses. Despite disputes about OCTS, we anticipate that Beijing and Hong Kong’s opposition will continue to abide by this principle in their future interactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Political homophobia The construction of Hong Kong’s “one country, two systems” in China Daily Rickety democracies From “them” to “us”? The use of metaphors to construct crisis discourses in describing COVID-19 vaccines in the Chinese and the American news media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1