Mohsen Yari, A. Rokhzadi, Keyvan Shamsi, B. Pasari, A. Rahimi
{"title":"荠菜(Camelina sativa L. Crantz)种子产量受氮、硫、牛粪和行距影响的 RSM 和 ANN 模型","authors":"Mohsen Yari, A. Rokhzadi, Keyvan Shamsi, B. Pasari, A. Rahimi","doi":"10.3390/horticulturae10010066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] is an annual versatile oilseed crop of the Brassicaceae family, with an increasingly cultivated area. Predicting camelina seed yield response to fertilization and planting density is of great importance in understanding production potential and management planning. Therefore, the current study aimed to estimate the seed yield of camelina by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) as affected by different levels of planting row spacing and nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), and cow manure (CM) fertilization. The experiment was conducted in two growing years of 2019–2020 and 2020–2021, based on a central composite design with four factors including row spacing (15–35 cm), N (0–200 kg ha−1), S (0–100 kg ha−1), and CM (0–40 t ha−1). The RSM models for seed yield versus fertilization and row spacing factors in both years were statistically significant and had an acceptable predictive ability. Camelina seed yield decreased with increasing row spacing but showed a positive response to increasing the amount of N, S, and CM fertilizers. Comparing the performance of the models showed that, although the RSM models were significant and had the necessary efficiency in predicting camelina seed yield, the ANN models were more accurate. The performance criteria of coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), standard error of prediction (SEP), mean absolute error (MAE), and Akaike information criterion (AICc) averaged over the two years for the RSM model were 0.924, 51.60, 5.51, 41.14, and 394.05, respectively, and for the ANN model were 0.968, 32.62, 3.54, 19.55, and 351.33, respectively. Based on the results, the ANN modeling can be used in predicting camelina seed yield in field conditions with more confidence than the RSM technique.","PeriodicalId":13034,"journal":{"name":"Horticulturae","volume":"117 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RSM and ANN Modeling of Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) Seed Yield as Affected by Nitrogen, Sulfur, Cow Manure, and Row Spacing\",\"authors\":\"Mohsen Yari, A. Rokhzadi, Keyvan Shamsi, B. Pasari, A. Rahimi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/horticulturae10010066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] is an annual versatile oilseed crop of the Brassicaceae family, with an increasingly cultivated area. Predicting camelina seed yield response to fertilization and planting density is of great importance in understanding production potential and management planning. Therefore, the current study aimed to estimate the seed yield of camelina by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) as affected by different levels of planting row spacing and nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), and cow manure (CM) fertilization. The experiment was conducted in two growing years of 2019–2020 and 2020–2021, based on a central composite design with four factors including row spacing (15–35 cm), N (0–200 kg ha−1), S (0–100 kg ha−1), and CM (0–40 t ha−1). The RSM models for seed yield versus fertilization and row spacing factors in both years were statistically significant and had an acceptable predictive ability. Camelina seed yield decreased with increasing row spacing but showed a positive response to increasing the amount of N, S, and CM fertilizers. Comparing the performance of the models showed that, although the RSM models were significant and had the necessary efficiency in predicting camelina seed yield, the ANN models were more accurate. The performance criteria of coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), standard error of prediction (SEP), mean absolute error (MAE), and Akaike information criterion (AICc) averaged over the two years for the RSM model were 0.924, 51.60, 5.51, 41.14, and 394.05, respectively, and for the ANN model were 0.968, 32.62, 3.54, 19.55, and 351.33, respectively. Based on the results, the ANN modeling can be used in predicting camelina seed yield in field conditions with more confidence than the RSM technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Horticulturae\",\"volume\":\"117 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Horticulturae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10010066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HORTICULTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horticulturae","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10010066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
RSM and ANN Modeling of Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) Seed Yield as Affected by Nitrogen, Sulfur, Cow Manure, and Row Spacing
Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] is an annual versatile oilseed crop of the Brassicaceae family, with an increasingly cultivated area. Predicting camelina seed yield response to fertilization and planting density is of great importance in understanding production potential and management planning. Therefore, the current study aimed to estimate the seed yield of camelina by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) as affected by different levels of planting row spacing and nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), and cow manure (CM) fertilization. The experiment was conducted in two growing years of 2019–2020 and 2020–2021, based on a central composite design with four factors including row spacing (15–35 cm), N (0–200 kg ha−1), S (0–100 kg ha−1), and CM (0–40 t ha−1). The RSM models for seed yield versus fertilization and row spacing factors in both years were statistically significant and had an acceptable predictive ability. Camelina seed yield decreased with increasing row spacing but showed a positive response to increasing the amount of N, S, and CM fertilizers. Comparing the performance of the models showed that, although the RSM models were significant and had the necessary efficiency in predicting camelina seed yield, the ANN models were more accurate. The performance criteria of coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), standard error of prediction (SEP), mean absolute error (MAE), and Akaike information criterion (AICc) averaged over the two years for the RSM model were 0.924, 51.60, 5.51, 41.14, and 394.05, respectively, and for the ANN model were 0.968, 32.62, 3.54, 19.55, and 351.33, respectively. Based on the results, the ANN modeling can be used in predicting camelina seed yield in field conditions with more confidence than the RSM technique.