快讯更有可能付费但参与度较低:将在线课程从计划发布改为按需发布对用户行为的影响

IF 11.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Marketing Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1177/00222429241227145
Joy Lu, Eric T. Bradlow, J. W. Hutchinson
{"title":"快讯更有可能付费但参与度较低:将在线课程从计划发布改为按需发布对用户行为的影响","authors":"Joy Lu, Eric T. Bradlow, J. W. Hutchinson","doi":"10.1177/00222429241227145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following trends in entertainment streaming services, online educational platforms are increasingly offering users flexible “on-demand” content options. It is important to understand how the timing of content release affects learning behaviors and firm revenue drivers. The current research studies over 67,000 users taking a marketing course before vs. after a natural experiment where the platform switched the course from a scheduled weekly-release format to an on-demand format with all content immediately available. The switch to on-demand positively impacted short-term firm revenue by increasing the number and proportion of certificate-paying users, suggesting that on-demand content can attract a broader set of consumers who value flexibility. On the downside, the switch resulted in users exhibiting lower lecture completion rates and quiz performance, and taking fewer additional business courses on the platform, representing a long-term cost. The results were robust to propensity score matching and stratification. The analyses also revealed that on-demand content enabled learning patterns that deviated from a standard evenly-paced schedule, including “strategic” binge learning and stretching out engagement past the recommended course period. Thus, while on-demand formats can boost revenues by bringing in more paying users, managers must consider new strategies for maintaining performance and engagement levels within these environments.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: More Likely to Pay but Less Engaged: the Effects of Switching Online Courses from Scheduled to On-Demand Release on User Behavior\",\"authors\":\"Joy Lu, Eric T. Bradlow, J. W. Hutchinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00222429241227145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following trends in entertainment streaming services, online educational platforms are increasingly offering users flexible “on-demand” content options. It is important to understand how the timing of content release affects learning behaviors and firm revenue drivers. The current research studies over 67,000 users taking a marketing course before vs. after a natural experiment where the platform switched the course from a scheduled weekly-release format to an on-demand format with all content immediately available. The switch to on-demand positively impacted short-term firm revenue by increasing the number and proportion of certificate-paying users, suggesting that on-demand content can attract a broader set of consumers who value flexibility. On the downside, the switch resulted in users exhibiting lower lecture completion rates and quiz performance, and taking fewer additional business courses on the platform, representing a long-term cost. The results were robust to propensity score matching and stratification. The analyses also revealed that on-demand content enabled learning patterns that deviated from a standard evenly-paced schedule, including “strategic” binge learning and stretching out engagement past the recommended course period. Thus, while on-demand formats can boost revenues by bringing in more paying users, managers must consider new strategies for maintaining performance and engagement levels within these environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241227145\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241227145","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着娱乐流媒体服务的发展趋势,在线教育平台也越来越多地为用户提供灵活的 "按需 "内容选择。了解内容发布时间如何影响学习行为和公司收入驱动力非常重要。目前的研究对 67,000 多名用户在自然实验前后学习市场营销课程的情况进行了研究,在自然实验中,平台将课程从计划的每周发布形式改为所有内容均可立即获取的点播形式。改为点播后,证书付费用户的数量和比例增加,对公司的短期收入产生了积极影响,这表明点播内容可以吸引更多重视灵活性的消费者。但从负面影响来看,用户的授课完成率和测验成绩都有所下降,在平台上选修更多商业课程的人数也有所减少,这意味着长期成本的增加。这些结果对倾向得分匹配和分层具有稳健性。分析还显示,点播内容使学习模式偏离了标准的匀速时间表,包括 "策略性 "狂热学习和将参与时间拉长到建议的课程时间之外。因此,虽然点播形式可以通过带来更多付费用户来提高收入,但管理者必须考虑在这些环境中保持绩效和参与水平的新策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS: More Likely to Pay but Less Engaged: the Effects of Switching Online Courses from Scheduled to On-Demand Release on User Behavior
Following trends in entertainment streaming services, online educational platforms are increasingly offering users flexible “on-demand” content options. It is important to understand how the timing of content release affects learning behaviors and firm revenue drivers. The current research studies over 67,000 users taking a marketing course before vs. after a natural experiment where the platform switched the course from a scheduled weekly-release format to an on-demand format with all content immediately available. The switch to on-demand positively impacted short-term firm revenue by increasing the number and proportion of certificate-paying users, suggesting that on-demand content can attract a broader set of consumers who value flexibility. On the downside, the switch resulted in users exhibiting lower lecture completion rates and quiz performance, and taking fewer additional business courses on the platform, representing a long-term cost. The results were robust to propensity score matching and stratification. The analyses also revealed that on-demand content enabled learning patterns that deviated from a standard evenly-paced schedule, including “strategic” binge learning and stretching out engagement past the recommended course period. Thus, while on-demand formats can boost revenues by bringing in more paying users, managers must consider new strategies for maintaining performance and engagement levels within these environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Sales Performance Rankings: Examining the Impact of the Type of Information Displayed on Sales Force Outcomes EXPRESS: Positive Emotions During Search Engine Use: How You Feel Impacts What You Search for and Click On EXPRESS: Emotional Energy: When Customer Interactions Energize Service Employees EXPRESS: Self-Donations and Charitable Contributions in Online Crowdfunding: an Empirical Analysis EXPRESS: Intersectionality in Marketing: a Paradigm for Understanding Understudied Consumers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1