因果关系和可操作的概率模型

David Cruz, Jorge Batista
{"title":"因果关系和可操作的概率模型","authors":"David Cruz, Jorge Batista","doi":"10.3389/fcomp.2023.1263386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Causal assertions stem from an asymmetric relation between some variable's causes and effects, i.e., they imply the existence of a function decomposition of a model where the effects are a function of the causes without implying that the causes are functions of the effects. In structural causal models, information is encoded in the compositions of functions that define variables because that information is used to constraint how an intervention that changes the definition of a variable influences the rest of the variables. Current probabilistic models with tractable marginalization also imply a function decomposition but with the purpose of allowing easy marginalization of variables. In this article, structural causal models are extended so that the information implicitly stored in their structure is made explicit in an input–output mapping in higher dimensional representation where we get to define the cause–effect relationships as constraints over a function space. Using the cause–effect relationships as constraints over a space of functions, the existing methodologies for handling causality with tractable probabilistic models are unified under a single framework and generalized.","PeriodicalId":510141,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Computer Science","volume":"42 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causality and tractable probabilistic models\",\"authors\":\"David Cruz, Jorge Batista\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcomp.2023.1263386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Causal assertions stem from an asymmetric relation between some variable's causes and effects, i.e., they imply the existence of a function decomposition of a model where the effects are a function of the causes without implying that the causes are functions of the effects. In structural causal models, information is encoded in the compositions of functions that define variables because that information is used to constraint how an intervention that changes the definition of a variable influences the rest of the variables. Current probabilistic models with tractable marginalization also imply a function decomposition but with the purpose of allowing easy marginalization of variables. In this article, structural causal models are extended so that the information implicitly stored in their structure is made explicit in an input–output mapping in higher dimensional representation where we get to define the cause–effect relationships as constraints over a function space. Using the cause–effect relationships as constraints over a space of functions, the existing methodologies for handling causality with tractable probabilistic models are unified under a single framework and generalized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"42 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1263386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1263386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

因果断言源于某些变量的因和果之间的不对称关系,即它们意味着模型中存在一种函数分解,在这种分解中,果是因的函数,而不意味着因是果的函数。在结构因果模型中,定义变量的函数组成中包含了信息,因为这些信息被用来约束改变变量定义的干预措施对其他变量的影响。目前的概率模型具有可操作性的边际化,也意味着函数分解,但其目的是便于变量的边际化。本文对结构因果模型进行了扩展,使其结构中隐含的信息在输入-输出映射中以更高的维度表示出来,我们可以把因果关系定义为函数空间上的约束条件。利用函数空间上的因果关系作为约束条件,将现有的利用可控概率模型处理因果关系的方法统一到一个框架下并加以推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causality and tractable probabilistic models
Causal assertions stem from an asymmetric relation between some variable's causes and effects, i.e., they imply the existence of a function decomposition of a model where the effects are a function of the causes without implying that the causes are functions of the effects. In structural causal models, information is encoded in the compositions of functions that define variables because that information is used to constraint how an intervention that changes the definition of a variable influences the rest of the variables. Current probabilistic models with tractable marginalization also imply a function decomposition but with the purpose of allowing easy marginalization of variables. In this article, structural causal models are extended so that the information implicitly stored in their structure is made explicit in an input–output mapping in higher dimensional representation where we get to define the cause–effect relationships as constraints over a function space. Using the cause–effect relationships as constraints over a space of functions, the existing methodologies for handling causality with tractable probabilistic models are unified under a single framework and generalized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cybersecurity for Industry 5.0: trends and gaps Device-enabled neighborhood-slot allocation for the edge-oriented Internet of Things High-quality implementation for a continuous-in-time financial API in C# Editorial: HCI and worker well-being Extracting typing game keystroke patterns as potential indicators of programming aptitude
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1