使用 Aday-Anderson 框架和多元回归模型对 2016-2019 年 USRDS 中美国少数种族/族裔群体家庭血液透析与中心血液透析的使用情况和健康结果进行定量研究

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Patient Related Outcome Measures Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/prom.s416279
Ying Zhu
{"title":"使用 Aday-Anderson 框架和多元回归模型对 2016-2019 年 USRDS 中美国少数种族/族裔群体家庭血液透析与中心血液透析的使用情况和健康结果进行定量研究","authors":"Ying Zhu","doi":"10.2147/prom.s416279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Home hemodialysis (HHD) offers patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) greater flexibility and advantages of health outcomes over center hemodialysis (CHD). This study aims to investigate the differences between home and center hemodialysis with a focus on racial/ethnic minorities. Methods The US Renal Disease System (USRDS) 2019 patient core data containing mortality and hospitalization which are cumulative since 2010 were merged with 2016–2019 Medicare clinical claims. To assess demographic and medical factors adjusted utilization and mortality of HHD vs CHD within every racial/ethnic cohort, logistic regression was used, and negative binomial regression was conducted to analyze the number of hospitalizations. Results Evaluating 548,453 (97.48%) CHD patients and 14,202 (2.52%) HHD patients with Whites 47%, Blacks 32%, Hispanics 15%, Asians 4%, and other minorities 2%, the outcomes from adjusted regressions showed that: 1) minorities were significantly less likely to use HHD than Whites (Blacks: OR, 0.568, 95% CI, 0.546–0.592; Hispanics: OR, 0.510, 95% CI, 0.477–0.544; Asians: OR, 0.689, 95% CI, 0.619–0.766; Others: OR, 0.453, 95% CI, 0.390–0.525; p < 0.001); 2) most minority patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities than Whites, and all minority groups displayed significantly lower mortality and hospitalization incidences than the White group with adjustment on multiple covariates; 3) in the overall and main racial/ethnic cohorts, HHD showed a significantly lower risk of death than CHD after confounding for major risk factors (overall cohort: OR, 0.686, 95% CI, 0.641–0.734; White: OR, 0.670, 95% CI, 0.612–0.734; Blacks: OR, 0.717, 95% CI, 0.644–0.799; Hispanics: OR, 0.715, 95% CI, 0.575–0.889; Others: OR, 0.473, 95% CI, 0.265–0.844). Conclusion There are substantial racial/ethnic variations in home hemodialysis use and health outcomes in the United States.","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usage and Health Outcomes of Home Hemodialysis vs Center Hemodialysis in Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in the United States a Quantitative Research in 2016–2019 USRDS Using Aday-Anderson Framework and Multiple Regression Models\",\"authors\":\"Ying Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/prom.s416279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Home hemodialysis (HHD) offers patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) greater flexibility and advantages of health outcomes over center hemodialysis (CHD). This study aims to investigate the differences between home and center hemodialysis with a focus on racial/ethnic minorities. Methods The US Renal Disease System (USRDS) 2019 patient core data containing mortality and hospitalization which are cumulative since 2010 were merged with 2016–2019 Medicare clinical claims. To assess demographic and medical factors adjusted utilization and mortality of HHD vs CHD within every racial/ethnic cohort, logistic regression was used, and negative binomial regression was conducted to analyze the number of hospitalizations. Results Evaluating 548,453 (97.48%) CHD patients and 14,202 (2.52%) HHD patients with Whites 47%, Blacks 32%, Hispanics 15%, Asians 4%, and other minorities 2%, the outcomes from adjusted regressions showed that: 1) minorities were significantly less likely to use HHD than Whites (Blacks: OR, 0.568, 95% CI, 0.546–0.592; Hispanics: OR, 0.510, 95% CI, 0.477–0.544; Asians: OR, 0.689, 95% CI, 0.619–0.766; Others: OR, 0.453, 95% CI, 0.390–0.525; p < 0.001); 2) most minority patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities than Whites, and all minority groups displayed significantly lower mortality and hospitalization incidences than the White group with adjustment on multiple covariates; 3) in the overall and main racial/ethnic cohorts, HHD showed a significantly lower risk of death than CHD after confounding for major risk factors (overall cohort: OR, 0.686, 95% CI, 0.641–0.734; White: OR, 0.670, 95% CI, 0.612–0.734; Blacks: OR, 0.717, 95% CI, 0.644–0.799; Hispanics: OR, 0.715, 95% CI, 0.575–0.889; Others: OR, 0.473, 95% CI, 0.265–0.844). Conclusion There are substantial racial/ethnic variations in home hemodialysis use and health outcomes in the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Related Outcome Measures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Related Outcome Measures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/prom.s416279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/prom.s416279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:与中心血液透析(CHD)相比,家庭血液透析(HHD)为终末期肾病(ESKD)患者提供了更大的灵活性和更佳的健康效果。本研究旨在调查家庭血液透析与中心血液透析之间的差异,重点关注少数种族/民族。方法 将美国肾脏疾病系统(USRDS)2019 年患者核心数据(包含自 2010 年以来累积的死亡率和住院情况)与 2016-2019 年医疗保险临床索赔合并。为了评估人口和医疗因素对每个种族/族裔队列中 HHD vs CHD 使用率和死亡率的影响,采用了逻辑回归,并对住院次数进行了负二项回归分析。结果 对 548,453 名(97.48%)心脏病患者和 14,202 名(2.52%)高血压患者进行了评估,其中白人占 47%,黑人占 32%,西班牙裔占 15%,亚裔占 4%,其他少数族裔占 2%:1) 少数民族使用 HHD 的可能性明显低于白人(黑人:OR, 0.568, 95%):OR,0.568,95% CI,0.546-0.592;西班牙裔:OR,0.510,95% CI,0.477-0.544;亚洲人:OR,0.689,95% CI,0.619-0.766;其他:OR,0.453,95% CI,0.390-0.525;P < 0.001);2)与白人相比,大多数少数族裔患者更年轻,合并症更少,在对多个协变量进行调整后,所有少数族裔群体的死亡率和住院发生率均显著低于白人群体;3)在总体队列和主要种族/族裔队列中,在对主要风险因素进行混淆后,HHD 的死亡风险显著低于 CHD(总体队列:OR,0.686,95% CI,0.641-0.734;白人:OR,0.670,95% CI,0.641-0.734;其他:OR,0.686,95% CI,0.641-0.525;P < 0:OR,0.670,95% CI,0.612-0.734;黑人:OR,0.717,95% CI,0.644-0.799;西班牙裔:OR,0.715,95% CI,0.575-0.889;其他:OR,0.473,95% CI,0.265-0.844)。结论 在美国,家庭血液透析的使用和健康结果存在很大的种族/民族差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usage and Health Outcomes of Home Hemodialysis vs Center Hemodialysis in Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in the United States a Quantitative Research in 2016–2019 USRDS Using Aday-Anderson Framework and Multiple Regression Models
Introduction Home hemodialysis (HHD) offers patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) greater flexibility and advantages of health outcomes over center hemodialysis (CHD). This study aims to investigate the differences between home and center hemodialysis with a focus on racial/ethnic minorities. Methods The US Renal Disease System (USRDS) 2019 patient core data containing mortality and hospitalization which are cumulative since 2010 were merged with 2016–2019 Medicare clinical claims. To assess demographic and medical factors adjusted utilization and mortality of HHD vs CHD within every racial/ethnic cohort, logistic regression was used, and negative binomial regression was conducted to analyze the number of hospitalizations. Results Evaluating 548,453 (97.48%) CHD patients and 14,202 (2.52%) HHD patients with Whites 47%, Blacks 32%, Hispanics 15%, Asians 4%, and other minorities 2%, the outcomes from adjusted regressions showed that: 1) minorities were significantly less likely to use HHD than Whites (Blacks: OR, 0.568, 95% CI, 0.546–0.592; Hispanics: OR, 0.510, 95% CI, 0.477–0.544; Asians: OR, 0.689, 95% CI, 0.619–0.766; Others: OR, 0.453, 95% CI, 0.390–0.525; p < 0.001); 2) most minority patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities than Whites, and all minority groups displayed significantly lower mortality and hospitalization incidences than the White group with adjustment on multiple covariates; 3) in the overall and main racial/ethnic cohorts, HHD showed a significantly lower risk of death than CHD after confounding for major risk factors (overall cohort: OR, 0.686, 95% CI, 0.641–0.734; White: OR, 0.670, 95% CI, 0.612–0.734; Blacks: OR, 0.717, 95% CI, 0.644–0.799; Hispanics: OR, 0.715, 95% CI, 0.575–0.889; Others: OR, 0.473, 95% CI, 0.265–0.844). Conclusion There are substantial racial/ethnic variations in home hemodialysis use and health outcomes in the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultra-Low Frequency Transmitted Ultrasound Breast Imaging vs DBT (Digital Breast Tomosynthesis): A Patient-Reported Outcome Study. Systematic Literature Review of Studies Reporting Measures of Functional Outcome or Quality of Life in People with Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia. Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Sinhala Translation of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI). Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Roadmap for Dry Eye and MGD PCORI-Funded Research Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics and Determinants of Unsuccessful Treatment Outcomes Among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients: A 5-Year Registry-Based Retrospective Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1