成人动脉血气采样中超声引导穿刺与传统技术的比较:系统综述

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING Enfermeria Intensiva Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enfi.2023.10.003
P. Romo-Miguel RN , S. Ballesteros-Peña RN, MPH, PhD
{"title":"成人动脉血气采样中超声引导穿刺与传统技术的比较:系统综述","authors":"P. Romo-Miguel RN ,&nbsp;S. Ballesteros-Peña RN, MPH, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2023.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To compare the efficacy of conventional puncture versus ultrasound-guided puncture for arterial blood gas sampling in adults.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A search protocol was developed and applied to 3<!--> <!-->databases (Medline, Cochrane, and Dialnet). Clinical trials published between January 2013 and January 2023, in Spanish or English, were considered. Outcomes in terms of first-attempt success, number of attempts until success, time taken, self-reported iatrogenic pain, and patient or professional experience were collected. The risk of bias for each included study was assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five randomized clinical trials were selected, with sample sizes ranging from 50 to 238 adult patients treated in emergency settings. Three out of 4<!--> <!-->studies showed higher first-attempt success rates when using ultrasound, and 2 out of 4 studies reported a decrease in iatrogenic pain. Discrepant findings were observed among the studies in terms of time taken and the number of attempts required for success.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although current evidence is limited and the findings are heterogeneous, ultrasound-guided arterial puncture may have advantages over conventional puncture in terms of first-attempt success and in reducing iatrogenic pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43993,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Intensiva","volume":"35 4","pages":"Pages 368-375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Punción ecoguiada versus técnica tradicional para la extracción de gasometrías arteriales en adultos: una revisión sistemática\",\"authors\":\"P. Romo-Miguel RN ,&nbsp;S. Ballesteros-Peña RN, MPH, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfi.2023.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To compare the efficacy of conventional puncture versus ultrasound-guided puncture for arterial blood gas sampling in adults.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A search protocol was developed and applied to 3<!--> <!-->databases (Medline, Cochrane, and Dialnet). Clinical trials published between January 2013 and January 2023, in Spanish or English, were considered. Outcomes in terms of first-attempt success, number of attempts until success, time taken, self-reported iatrogenic pain, and patient or professional experience were collected. The risk of bias for each included study was assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five randomized clinical trials were selected, with sample sizes ranging from 50 to 238 adult patients treated in emergency settings. Three out of 4<!--> <!-->studies showed higher first-attempt success rates when using ultrasound, and 2 out of 4 studies reported a decrease in iatrogenic pain. Discrepant findings were observed among the studies in terms of time taken and the number of attempts required for success.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although current evidence is limited and the findings are heterogeneous, ultrasound-guided arterial puncture may have advantages over conventional puncture in terms of first-attempt success and in reducing iatrogenic pain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria Intensiva\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 368-375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria Intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239923000913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239923000913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较成人动脉血气采样中传统穿刺与超声引导穿刺的疗效。 方法制定了检索方案,并应用于 3 个数据库(Medline、Cochrane 和 Dialnet)。检索对象为 2013 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月间发表的西班牙文或英文临床试验。收集了首次尝试成功率、成功前尝试次数、所需时间、自我报告的先天性疼痛以及患者或专业人员的经验等方面的结果。对每项纳入研究的偏倚风险进行了评估。结果 筛选出了 5 项随机临床试验,样本量从 50 到 238 名在急诊环境中接受治疗的成年患者不等。4项研究中有3项显示,使用超声波治疗时首次尝试成功率更高,4项研究中有2项报告称人为疼痛有所减轻。结论虽然目前的证据有限,研究结果也不尽相同,但超声引导下动脉穿刺在首次穿刺成功率和减少先天性疼痛方面可能比传统穿刺更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Punción ecoguiada versus técnica tradicional para la extracción de gasometrías arteriales en adultos: una revisión sistemática

Aim

To compare the efficacy of conventional puncture versus ultrasound-guided puncture for arterial blood gas sampling in adults.

Method

A search protocol was developed and applied to 3 databases (Medline, Cochrane, and Dialnet). Clinical trials published between January 2013 and January 2023, in Spanish or English, were considered. Outcomes in terms of first-attempt success, number of attempts until success, time taken, self-reported iatrogenic pain, and patient or professional experience were collected. The risk of bias for each included study was assessed.

Results

Five randomized clinical trials were selected, with sample sizes ranging from 50 to 238 adult patients treated in emergency settings. Three out of 4 studies showed higher first-attempt success rates when using ultrasound, and 2 out of 4 studies reported a decrease in iatrogenic pain. Discrepant findings were observed among the studies in terms of time taken and the number of attempts required for success.

Conclusions

Although current evidence is limited and the findings are heterogeneous, ultrasound-guided arterial puncture may have advantages over conventional puncture in terms of first-attempt success and in reducing iatrogenic pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Enfermería Intensiva es el medio de comunicación por antonomasia para todos los profesionales de enfermería españoles que desarrollan su actividad profesional en las unidades de cuidados intensivos o en cualquier otro lugar donde se atiende al paciente crítico. Enfermería Intensiva publica cuatro números al año, cuyos temas son específicos para la enfermería de cuidados intensivos. Es la única publicación en español con carácter nacional y está indexada en prestigiosas bases de datos como International Nursing Index, MEDLINE, Índice de Enfermería, Cuiden, Índice Médico Español, Toxline, etc.
期刊最新文献
Punción ecoguiada versus técnica tradicional para la extracción de gasometrías arteriales en adultos: una revisión sistemática Perspectiva de género en la realización de la higiene en cuidados intensivos cardiológicos Barriers to reporting adverse events from the perspective of ICU nurses: A mixed-method study Drug interactions in a coronary care unit: Adversity or therapeutic success? Utilización de un sistema de valoración para la asignación de recurso humano en el transporte intrahospitalario del paciente ingresado en una unidad de cuidados intensivos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1