国际贸易网络与股市关联性:十一个主要经济体的证据

IF 5.4 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101939
Kefei You , V.L. Raju Chinthalapati , Tapas Mishra , Ramakanta Patra
{"title":"国际贸易网络与股市关联性:十一个主要经济体的证据","authors":"Kefei You ,&nbsp;V.L. Raju Chinthalapati ,&nbsp;Tapas Mishra ,&nbsp;Ramakanta Patra","doi":"10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Depth of cross-country international trade engagement is an important source of (the strength of) stock-market connectedness, depicting how directional attributes of trade determine the magnitude of spillover of stock returns across economies. We premise and test this hypothesis for a group of eleven major economies during 2000 m1-2021 m6 using both system-wide and directional evidence. We exploit the input–output network of <span>Bilgin and Yilmaz (2018)</span> to construct a trade-network, and use <span>Diebold and Yilmaz, 2009</span>, <span>Diebold and Yilmaz, 2012</span>, <span>Diebold and Yilmaz, 2014</span> Connectedness Index to proxy for stock-market connectedness among economies. We reveal China’s instrumental role in the trade-network and its rising influence in stock markets dominated by the US. Motivated by the fact that shocks on an economy’s imports and exports may lead to different magnitude of stock market spillover to its trade partner, we further carry out a pairwise directional level investigation. Once the directional dimensions of both the trade flows and the stock market influences are considered, we find that an economy’s stock return spillover to its trade partner is generated from its position as an importer and exporter. More importantly, being an importer is found to be a stronger source of such spillover than being an exporter.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443124000052/pdfft?md5=aa4adf34b2639ad6aa269e10b288cf34&pid=1-s2.0-S1042443124000052-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International trade network and stock market connectedness: Evidence from eleven major economies\",\"authors\":\"Kefei You ,&nbsp;V.L. Raju Chinthalapati ,&nbsp;Tapas Mishra ,&nbsp;Ramakanta Patra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Depth of cross-country international trade engagement is an important source of (the strength of) stock-market connectedness, depicting how directional attributes of trade determine the magnitude of spillover of stock returns across economies. We premise and test this hypothesis for a group of eleven major economies during 2000 m1-2021 m6 using both system-wide and directional evidence. We exploit the input–output network of <span>Bilgin and Yilmaz (2018)</span> to construct a trade-network, and use <span>Diebold and Yilmaz, 2009</span>, <span>Diebold and Yilmaz, 2012</span>, <span>Diebold and Yilmaz, 2014</span> Connectedness Index to proxy for stock-market connectedness among economies. We reveal China’s instrumental role in the trade-network and its rising influence in stock markets dominated by the US. Motivated by the fact that shocks on an economy’s imports and exports may lead to different magnitude of stock market spillover to its trade partner, we further carry out a pairwise directional level investigation. Once the directional dimensions of both the trade flows and the stock market influences are considered, we find that an economy’s stock return spillover to its trade partner is generated from its position as an importer and exporter. More importantly, being an importer is found to be a stronger source of such spillover than being an exporter.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443124000052/pdfft?md5=aa4adf34b2639ad6aa269e10b288cf34&pid=1-s2.0-S1042443124000052-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443124000052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443124000052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨国国际贸易参与的深度是股票市场关联性(强度)的一个重要来源,它描述了贸易的方向性属性如何决定股票回报在不同经济体间溢出的程度。我们利用全系统和方向性证据,对 2000 m1-2021 m6 期间 11 个主要经济体的这一假设进行了前提假设和检验。我们利用 Bilgin 和 Yilmaz(2018 年)的投入产出网络构建贸易网络,并使用 Diebold 和 Yilmaz,2009 年;Diebold 和 Yilmaz,2012 年;Diebold 和 Yilmaz,2014 年的连通性指数来代表各经济体之间的股市连通性。我们揭示了中国在贸易网络中的重要作用,以及其在美国主导的股票市场中不断上升的影响力。由于一个经济体的进出口受到冲击可能会导致其贸易伙伴的股市溢出程度不同,因此我们进一步进行了成对的方向性研究。一旦考虑到贸易流动和股市影响的方向性维度,我们就会发现,一个经济体对其贸易伙伴的股票收益溢出效应产生于其作为进口国和出口国的地位。更重要的是,作为进口国比作为出口国更能产生这种溢出效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International trade network and stock market connectedness: Evidence from eleven major economies

Depth of cross-country international trade engagement is an important source of (the strength of) stock-market connectedness, depicting how directional attributes of trade determine the magnitude of spillover of stock returns across economies. We premise and test this hypothesis for a group of eleven major economies during 2000 m1-2021 m6 using both system-wide and directional evidence. We exploit the input–output network of Bilgin and Yilmaz (2018) to construct a trade-network, and use Diebold and Yilmaz, 2009, Diebold and Yilmaz, 2012, Diebold and Yilmaz, 2014 Connectedness Index to proxy for stock-market connectedness among economies. We reveal China’s instrumental role in the trade-network and its rising influence in stock markets dominated by the US. Motivated by the fact that shocks on an economy’s imports and exports may lead to different magnitude of stock market spillover to its trade partner, we further carry out a pairwise directional level investigation. Once the directional dimensions of both the trade flows and the stock market influences are considered, we find that an economy’s stock return spillover to its trade partner is generated from its position as an importer and exporter. More importantly, being an importer is found to be a stronger source of such spillover than being an exporter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: International trade, financing and investments, and the related cash and credit transactions, have grown at an extremely rapid pace in recent years. The international monetary system has continued to evolve to accommodate the need for foreign-currency denominated transactions and in the process has provided opportunities for its ongoing observation and study. The purpose of the Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money is to publish rigorous, original articles dealing with the international aspects of financial markets, institutions and money. Theoretical/conceptual and empirical papers providing meaningful insights into the subject areas will be considered. The following topic areas, although not exhaustive, are representative of the coverage in this Journal. • International financial markets • International securities markets • Foreign exchange markets • Eurocurrency markets • International syndications • Term structures of Eurocurrency rates • Determination of exchange rates • Information, speculation and parity • Forward rates and swaps • International payment mechanisms • International commercial banking; • International investment banking • Central bank intervention • International monetary systems • Balance of payments.
期刊最新文献
The Shock of US-China trade war and the job Market: Downstream shrinkage and upstream employment Beyond the target: The spillover effect of shareholder activism on corporate tax avoidance The bind and the slack of Basel III liquidity regulations: Evidence from Indonesia A more sustainable future: Can politically connected CEOs spur the nexus between ESG performance and firm financial performance? Are state-owned enterprises more responsible for carbon neutrality? Evidence from stock market reactions to China’s commitment to carbon neutrality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1