在小学教育中通过学习分析增强历史思维:通向形成性评估的桥梁

IF 4.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education and Information Technologies Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1007/s10639-023-12425-w
Sergio Tirado-Olivares, Carlota López-Fernández, José Antonio González-Calero, Ramón Cózar-Gutiérrez
{"title":"在小学教育中通过学习分析增强历史思维:通向形成性评估的桥梁","authors":"Sergio Tirado-Olivares, Carlota López-Fernández, José Antonio González-Calero, Ramón Cózar-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1007/s10639-023-12425-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>History teaching from early educational stages not only should assess the student's ability to memorise historical content, but also their ability to think historically. Traditional summative tests do not enable teachers to continuously monitor the progress of students. This study evaluates the effect in history learning of incorporating learning analytics (LA) in terms of academic achievement and self-efficacy. Seventy-six elementary students aged 10–12 years old participated in the study. The results indicate that the integration of LA particularly helped students with low historical knowledge and enabled the prediction of academic achievement, especially in historical thinking. The results also highlight the disparity between students' knowledge and students' self-efficacy during the lessons, and what they demonstrate in exams, indicating the need to incorporate tasks before exams that allow students to identify their limitations and misconceptions. These results suggest that LA in history teaching may provide teachers with useful information for formative assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing historical thinking through learning analytics in Primary Education: A bridge to formative assessment\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Tirado-Olivares, Carlota López-Fernández, José Antonio González-Calero, Ramón Cózar-Gutiérrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10639-023-12425-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>History teaching from early educational stages not only should assess the student's ability to memorise historical content, but also their ability to think historically. Traditional summative tests do not enable teachers to continuously monitor the progress of students. This study evaluates the effect in history learning of incorporating learning analytics (LA) in terms of academic achievement and self-efficacy. Seventy-six elementary students aged 10–12 years old participated in the study. The results indicate that the integration of LA particularly helped students with low historical knowledge and enabled the prediction of academic achievement, especially in historical thinking. The results also highlight the disparity between students' knowledge and students' self-efficacy during the lessons, and what they demonstrate in exams, indicating the need to incorporate tasks before exams that allow students to identify their limitations and misconceptions. These results suggest that LA in history teaching may provide teachers with useful information for formative assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Information Technologies\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Information Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12425-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12425-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从早期教育阶段开始的历史教学不仅要评估学生记忆历史内容的能力,还要评估他们的历史思维能力。传统的终结性测试无法让教师持续监控学生的进步。本研究从学业成绩和自我效能两个方面评估了学习分析(LA)对历史学习的影响。76 名 10-12 岁的小学生参与了研究。研究结果表明,融入学习分析法尤其有助于历史知识水平较低的学生,并能预测学业成绩,特别是历史思维方面的成绩。研究结果还凸显了学生在课堂上的知识掌握情况和自我效能感,与他们在考试中的表现之间的差距,表明有必要在考试前加入任务,让学生发现自己的局限和误解。这些结果表明,历史教学中的LA可为教师的形成性评价提供有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing historical thinking through learning analytics in Primary Education: A bridge to formative assessment

History teaching from early educational stages not only should assess the student's ability to memorise historical content, but also their ability to think historically. Traditional summative tests do not enable teachers to continuously monitor the progress of students. This study evaluates the effect in history learning of incorporating learning analytics (LA) in terms of academic achievement and self-efficacy. Seventy-six elementary students aged 10–12 years old participated in the study. The results indicate that the integration of LA particularly helped students with low historical knowledge and enabled the prediction of academic achievement, especially in historical thinking. The results also highlight the disparity between students' knowledge and students' self-efficacy during the lessons, and what they demonstrate in exams, indicating the need to incorporate tasks before exams that allow students to identify their limitations and misconceptions. These results suggest that LA in history teaching may provide teachers with useful information for formative assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
610
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments. The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts.  The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.
期刊最新文献
Development of a virtual reality creative enhancement system utilizing haptic vibration feedback via electroencephalography Is ChatGPT like a nine-year-old child in theory of mind? Evidence from Chinese writing Analysing factors influencing undergraduates’ adoption of intelligent physical education systems using an expanded TAM The importance of aligning instructor age with learning content in designing instructional videos for older adults Evaluating classroom response systems in engineering education: Which metrics better reflect student performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1