改进基于像素的区域滑坡易发性制图

IF 8.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geoscience frontiers Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101782
Xin Wei , Paolo Gardoni , Lulu Zhang , Lin Tan , Dongsheng Liu , Chunlan Du , Hai Li
{"title":"改进基于像素的区域滑坡易发性制图","authors":"Xin Wei ,&nbsp;Paolo Gardoni ,&nbsp;Lulu Zhang ,&nbsp;Lin Tan ,&nbsp;Dongsheng Liu ,&nbsp;Chunlan Du ,&nbsp;Hai Li","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Regional landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is essential for risk mitigation. While deep learning algorithms are increasingly used in LSM, their extensive parameters and scarce labels (limited landslide records) pose training challenges. In contrast, classical statistical algorithms, with typically fewer parameters, are less likely to overfit, easier to train, and offer greater interpretability. Additionally, integrating physics-based and data-driven approaches can potentially improve LSM. This paper makes several contributions to enhance the practicality, interpretability, and cross-regional generalization ability of regional LSM models: (1) Two new hybrid models, composed of data-driven and physics-based modules, are proposed and compared. Hybrid Model I combines the infinite slope stability analysis (ISSA) with logistic regression, a classical statistical algorithm. Hybrid Model II integrates ISSA with a convolutional neural network, a representative of deep learning techniques. The physics-based module constructs a new explanatory factor with higher nonlinearity and reduces prediction uncertainty caused by incomplete landslide inventory by pre-selecting non-landslide samples. The data-driven module captures the relation between explanatory factors and landslide inventory. (2) A step-wise deletion process is proposed to assess the importance of explanatory factors and identify the minimum necessary factors required to maintain satisfactory model performance. (3) Single-pixel and local-area samples are compared to understand the effect of pixel spatial neighborhood. (4) The impact of nonlinearity in data-driven algorithms on hybrid model performance is explored. Typical landslide-prone regions in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China, are used as the study area. The results show that, in the testing region, by using local-area samples to account for pixel spatial neighborhoods, Hybrid Model I achieves roughly a 4.2% increase in the AUC. Furthermore, models with 30 m resolution land-cover data surpass those using 1000 m resolution data, showing a 5.5% improvement in AUC. The optimal set of explanatory factors includes elevation, land-cover type, and safety factor. These findings reveal the key elements to enhance regional LSM, offering valuable insights for LSM practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987124000069/pdfft?md5=e10aefacb8174a110765b9995910a644&pid=1-s2.0-S1674987124000069-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving pixel-based regional landslide susceptibility mapping\",\"authors\":\"Xin Wei ,&nbsp;Paolo Gardoni ,&nbsp;Lulu Zhang ,&nbsp;Lin Tan ,&nbsp;Dongsheng Liu ,&nbsp;Chunlan Du ,&nbsp;Hai Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Regional landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is essential for risk mitigation. While deep learning algorithms are increasingly used in LSM, their extensive parameters and scarce labels (limited landslide records) pose training challenges. In contrast, classical statistical algorithms, with typically fewer parameters, are less likely to overfit, easier to train, and offer greater interpretability. Additionally, integrating physics-based and data-driven approaches can potentially improve LSM. This paper makes several contributions to enhance the practicality, interpretability, and cross-regional generalization ability of regional LSM models: (1) Two new hybrid models, composed of data-driven and physics-based modules, are proposed and compared. Hybrid Model I combines the infinite slope stability analysis (ISSA) with logistic regression, a classical statistical algorithm. Hybrid Model II integrates ISSA with a convolutional neural network, a representative of deep learning techniques. The physics-based module constructs a new explanatory factor with higher nonlinearity and reduces prediction uncertainty caused by incomplete landslide inventory by pre-selecting non-landslide samples. The data-driven module captures the relation between explanatory factors and landslide inventory. (2) A step-wise deletion process is proposed to assess the importance of explanatory factors and identify the minimum necessary factors required to maintain satisfactory model performance. (3) Single-pixel and local-area samples are compared to understand the effect of pixel spatial neighborhood. (4) The impact of nonlinearity in data-driven algorithms on hybrid model performance is explored. Typical landslide-prone regions in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China, are used as the study area. The results show that, in the testing region, by using local-area samples to account for pixel spatial neighborhoods, Hybrid Model I achieves roughly a 4.2% increase in the AUC. Furthermore, models with 30 m resolution land-cover data surpass those using 1000 m resolution data, showing a 5.5% improvement in AUC. The optimal set of explanatory factors includes elevation, land-cover type, and safety factor. These findings reveal the key elements to enhance regional LSM, offering valuable insights for LSM practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoscience frontiers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987124000069/pdfft?md5=e10aefacb8174a110765b9995910a644&pid=1-s2.0-S1674987124000069-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoscience frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987124000069\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987124000069","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

区域滑坡易发性绘图(LSM)对于降低风险至关重要。虽然深度学习算法越来越多地用于 LSM,但其广泛的参数和稀缺的标签(有限的滑坡记录)给训练带来了挑战。相比之下,经典统计算法的参数通常较少,不易过拟合,更易于训练,可解释性更高。此外,将基于物理的方法与数据驱动的方法相结合,也有可能改进 LSM。本文在提高区域 LSM 模型的实用性、可解释性和跨区域泛化能力方面做出了几项贡献:(1)提出并比较了由数据驱动模块和物理模块组成的两个新的混合模型。混合模型 I 将无限坡度稳定性分析(ISSA)与经典统计算法 logistic 回归相结合。混合模型 II 将 ISSA 与卷积神经网络(深度学习技术的代表)相结合。基于物理的模块构建了一个新的解释因子,具有更高的非线性,并通过预选非滑坡样本,减少了因不完整滑坡清单造成的预测不确定性。数据驱动模块捕捉解释因子与滑坡存量之间的关系。(2) 提出了一个逐步删除过程,以评估解释因子的重要性,并确定保持令人满意的模型性能所需的最小必要因子。(3) 对单像素和局部区域样本进行比较,以了解像素空间邻域的影响。(4) 探讨了数据驱动算法中的非线性对混合模型性能的影响。以中国三峡库区典型的滑坡易发区为研究区域。结果表明,在测试区域,通过使用局部区域样本来考虑像素空间邻域,混合模型 I 的 AUC 大约提高了 4.2%。此外,使用 30 米分辨率土地覆盖数据的模型超过了使用 1000 米分辨率数据的模型,AUC 提高了 5.5%。最佳解释因子集包括海拔高度、土地覆被类型和安全系数。这些发现揭示了增强区域土地退化管理的关键因素,为土地退化管理实践提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving pixel-based regional landslide susceptibility mapping

Regional landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is essential for risk mitigation. While deep learning algorithms are increasingly used in LSM, their extensive parameters and scarce labels (limited landslide records) pose training challenges. In contrast, classical statistical algorithms, with typically fewer parameters, are less likely to overfit, easier to train, and offer greater interpretability. Additionally, integrating physics-based and data-driven approaches can potentially improve LSM. This paper makes several contributions to enhance the practicality, interpretability, and cross-regional generalization ability of regional LSM models: (1) Two new hybrid models, composed of data-driven and physics-based modules, are proposed and compared. Hybrid Model I combines the infinite slope stability analysis (ISSA) with logistic regression, a classical statistical algorithm. Hybrid Model II integrates ISSA with a convolutional neural network, a representative of deep learning techniques. The physics-based module constructs a new explanatory factor with higher nonlinearity and reduces prediction uncertainty caused by incomplete landslide inventory by pre-selecting non-landslide samples. The data-driven module captures the relation between explanatory factors and landslide inventory. (2) A step-wise deletion process is proposed to assess the importance of explanatory factors and identify the minimum necessary factors required to maintain satisfactory model performance. (3) Single-pixel and local-area samples are compared to understand the effect of pixel spatial neighborhood. (4) The impact of nonlinearity in data-driven algorithms on hybrid model performance is explored. Typical landslide-prone regions in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China, are used as the study area. The results show that, in the testing region, by using local-area samples to account for pixel spatial neighborhoods, Hybrid Model I achieves roughly a 4.2% increase in the AUC. Furthermore, models with 30 m resolution land-cover data surpass those using 1000 m resolution data, showing a 5.5% improvement in AUC. The optimal set of explanatory factors includes elevation, land-cover type, and safety factor. These findings reveal the key elements to enhance regional LSM, offering valuable insights for LSM practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoscience frontiers
Geoscience frontiers Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.
期刊最新文献
Does energy policy uncertainty matter for renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies? An affordable and clean energy perspective Evaluation of environmental geochemical signatures due to RO rejects on arid agricultural farms and tangible solutions Melting temperature of iron under the Earth’s inner core condition from deep machine learning Formation of high-silica adakites and their relationship with slab break-off: Implications for generating fertile Cu-Au-Mo porphyry systems Tectonic controls on ore deposit exhumation and preservation: A case study of the Handan-Xingtai iron-skarn district
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1