别担心，他们会明白的：指令对 "人类阶梯 "上的非人化评级没有影响。

IF 1.9 4区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of General Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1080/00221309.2023.2300145

Devin L Johnson, Sukhvinder S Obhi

{"title":"别担心，他们会明白的：指令对 \"人类阶梯 \"上的非人化评级没有影响。","authors":"Devin L Johnson, Sukhvinder S Obhi","doi":"10.1080/00221309.2023.2300145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A common method for assessing blatant dehumanization asks participants to rate \"how evolved\" they think members of various social groups are using the Ascent of Human scale (AOH) that transitions in stages from a crawling ape to a fully upright modern human. However, little is known about how task instructions affect participant ratings. In this pre-registered study, participants saw alternative forms of instruction including the traditional instructions emphasizing \"evolution\", a prompt without any reference to evolution, and a prompt that clearly explained that the scale assesses dehumanization. Instruction type had no effect on dehumanization ratings on the AOH scale. These results support the idea that the AOH scale is a robust means of assessing blatant dehumanization.","PeriodicalId":47581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Don't worry, they get the idea: instructions have no impact on dehumanization ratings on the Ascent of Human Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Devin L Johnson, Sukhvinder S Obhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00221309.2023.2300145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A common method for assessing blatant dehumanization asks participants to rate \\\"how evolved\\\" they think members of various social groups are using the Ascent of Human scale (AOH) that transitions in stages from a crawling ape to a fully upright modern human. However, little is known about how task instructions affect participant ratings. In this pre-registered study, participants saw alternative forms of instruction including the traditional instructions emphasizing \\\"evolution\\\", a prompt without any reference to evolution, and a prompt that clearly explained that the scale assesses dehumanization. Instruction type had no effect on dehumanization ratings on the AOH scale. These results support the idea that the AOH scale is a robust means of assessing blatant dehumanization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2023.2300145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2023.2300145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

评估公然非人化的一种常用方法是，要求参与者使用 "人类进化程度量表"（Ascent of Human scale，AOH）来评定他们认为不同社会群体成员的 "进化程度"，该量表从爬行的猿到完全直立的现代人分阶段进行评定。然而，人们对任务指示如何影响参与者的评分知之甚少。在这项预先登记的研究中，参与者看到了不同形式的指示，包括强调 "进化 "的传统指示、不提及进化的提示以及明确解释量表评估非人化的提示。教学类型对 AOH 量表的非人化评分没有影响。这些结果支持了 "AOH 量表是评估公然非人化的可靠方法 "这一观点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Don't worry, they get the idea: instructions have no impact on dehumanization ratings on the Ascent of Human Scale.

A common method for assessing blatant dehumanization asks participants to rate "how evolved" they think members of various social groups are using the Ascent of Human scale (AOH) that transitions in stages from a crawling ape to a fully upright modern human. However, little is known about how task instructions affect participant ratings. In this pre-registered study, participants saw alternative forms of instruction including the traditional instructions emphasizing "evolution", a prompt without any reference to evolution, and a prompt that clearly explained that the scale assesses dehumanization. Instruction type had no effect on dehumanization ratings on the AOH scale. These results support the idea that the AOH scale is a robust means of assessing blatant dehumanization.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of General Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of General Psychology publishes human and animal research reflecting various methodological approaches in all areas of experimental psychology. It covers traditional topics such as physiological and comparative psychology, sensation, perception, learning, and motivation, as well as more diverse topics such as cognition, memory, language, aging, and substance abuse, or mathematical, statistical, methodological, and other theoretical investigations. The journal especially features studies that establish functional relationships, involve a series of integrated experiments, or contribute to the development of new theoretical insights or practical applications.