冷冻球囊心房颤动消融术对心力衰竭患者的疗效和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Nithi Tokavanich , Witina Techasatian , Narut Prasitlumkum , Wisit Cheungpasitporn , Leenhapong Navaravong , Krit Jongarangsin , Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul
{"title":"冷冻球囊心房颤动消融术对心力衰竭患者的疗效和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Nithi Tokavanich ,&nbsp;Witina Techasatian ,&nbsp;Narut Prasitlumkum ,&nbsp;Wisit Cheungpasitporn ,&nbsp;Leenhapong Navaravong ,&nbsp;Krit Jongarangsin ,&nbsp;Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul","doi":"10.1016/j.ipej.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>While atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has proven beneficial for heart failure (HF) patients, most reports were performed with radiofrequency ablation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon AF ablation in patients with HFrEF.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from inception to December 2022. Studies that reported the outcomes of freedom from atrial arrhythmia, complications, NYHA functional class (NYHA FC), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after Cryoballoon AF ablation in HF patients were included. Data from each study were combined with a random-effects model.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>A total of 9 studies observational studies with 1414 HF patients were included. Five studies had only HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 1 study with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and others with mixed HF types. Freedom from AA in HFrEF at 12 months was 64% (95% CI 56–71%, I<sup>2</sup> 58%). There was a significant improvement of LVEF in these patients with a standard mean difference of 13% (95% CI 8.6–17.5%, I<sup>2</sup> 99% P &lt; 0.001. The complication rate in HFrEF group was 6% (95% CI 4–10%, I<sup>2</sup> 0%). The risk of recurrence of atrial arrhythmia was not significantly different between HF and no HF patients (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.8–2.23, I2 76%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cryoballoon AF ablation is effective in HFrEF patients comparable to radiofrequency ablation. The complication rate was low.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35900,"journal":{"name":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","volume":"24 3","pages":"Pages 123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy and safety of cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Nithi Tokavanich ,&nbsp;Witina Techasatian ,&nbsp;Narut Prasitlumkum ,&nbsp;Wisit Cheungpasitporn ,&nbsp;Leenhapong Navaravong ,&nbsp;Krit Jongarangsin ,&nbsp;Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ipej.2024.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>While atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has proven beneficial for heart failure (HF) patients, most reports were performed with radiofrequency ablation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon AF ablation in patients with HFrEF.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from inception to December 2022. Studies that reported the outcomes of freedom from atrial arrhythmia, complications, NYHA functional class (NYHA FC), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after Cryoballoon AF ablation in HF patients were included. Data from each study were combined with a random-effects model.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>A total of 9 studies observational studies with 1414 HF patients were included. Five studies had only HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 1 study with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and others with mixed HF types. Freedom from AA in HFrEF at 12 months was 64% (95% CI 56–71%, I<sup>2</sup> 58%). There was a significant improvement of LVEF in these patients with a standard mean difference of 13% (95% CI 8.6–17.5%, I<sup>2</sup> 99% P &lt; 0.001. The complication rate in HFrEF group was 6% (95% CI 4–10%, I<sup>2</sup> 0%). The risk of recurrence of atrial arrhythmia was not significantly different between HF and no HF patients (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.8–2.23, I2 76%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cryoballoon AF ablation is effective in HFrEF patients comparable to radiofrequency ablation. The complication rate was low.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 123-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143725/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629224000019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629224000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:虽然心房颤动(AF)消融术已被证明对心力衰竭(HF)患者有益,但大多数报告都是通过射频消融术进行的。我们旨在评估冷冻球囊心房颤动消融术对心衰患者的疗效和安全性:我们全面检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库中从开始到 2022 年 12 月的内容。方法:我们全面检索了自 2022 年 12 月起的 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库,纳入了报告 HF 患者冷冻球囊房颤消融术后无房性心律失常、并发症、NYHA 功能分级(NYHA FC)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)的研究。采用随机效应模型对每项研究的数据进行综合分析:结果:共纳入了9项观察性研究,1414名心房颤动患者。结果:共纳入9项观察性研究,1414名心房颤动患者,其中5项研究仅涉及射血分数降低的心房颤动(HFrEF),1项研究涉及射血分数保留的心房颤动(HFpEF),其他研究涉及混合型心房颤动。12 个月后,HFrEF 的 AA 自由度为 64% (95% CI 56-71%,I2 58%)。这些患者的 LVEF 有明显改善,标准平均差为 13% (95% CI 8.6-17.5%, I2 99% P 2 0%)。心房颤动患者和无心房颤动患者的房性心律失常复发风险无明显差异(RR 1.34,95% CI 0.8-2.23,I2 76%):结论:低温球囊房颤消融术对高频房颤患者的疗效与射频消融术相当。并发症发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy and safety of cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

While atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has proven beneficial for heart failure (HF) patients, most reports were performed with radiofrequency ablation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon AF ablation in patients with HFrEF.

Method

We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from inception to December 2022. Studies that reported the outcomes of freedom from atrial arrhythmia, complications, NYHA functional class (NYHA FC), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after Cryoballoon AF ablation in HF patients were included. Data from each study were combined with a random-effects model.

Result

A total of 9 studies observational studies with 1414 HF patients were included. Five studies had only HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 1 study with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and others with mixed HF types. Freedom from AA in HFrEF at 12 months was 64% (95% CI 56–71%, I2 58%). There was a significant improvement of LVEF in these patients with a standard mean difference of 13% (95% CI 8.6–17.5%, I2 99% P < 0.001. The complication rate in HFrEF group was 6% (95% CI 4–10%, I2 0%). The risk of recurrence of atrial arrhythmia was not significantly different between HF and no HF patients (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.8–2.23, I2 76%).

Conclusion

Cryoballoon AF ablation is effective in HFrEF patients comparable to radiofrequency ablation. The complication rate was low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal is a peer reviewed online journal devoted to cardiac pacing and electrophysiology. Editorial Advisory Board includes eminent personalities in the field of cardiac pacing and electrophysiology from Asia, Australia, Europe and North America.
期刊最新文献
Contribution of Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine in Managing Congenital Long QT Syndrome with 2:1 Atrioventricular Block. Left internal jugular vein approach to right atrial appendage base implantation of the Aveir AR leadless pacemaker. Appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy triggered by heat stroke. Lesion characteristics of long application time ablation using unipolar half-normal saline irrigation and bipolar normal saline irrigation. Inadvertent higher rate atrial pacing after dual chamber pacemaker implantation - What is the underlying mechanism?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1