Walleska Feijó Liberato, Eloah Nunes de Almeida, Marco Antonio Gallito, André Luis Faria-e-Silva, Luis Felipe Jochims Schneider, Larissa Maria Assad Cavalcante
{"title":"灰色背景和光源对牙色选择的影响","authors":"Walleska Feijó Liberato, Eloah Nunes de Almeida, Marco Antonio Gallito, André Luis Faria-e-Silva, Luis Felipe Jochims Schneider, Larissa Maria Assad Cavalcante","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Statement of problem</h3><p>Visual shade selection in dentistry may be influenced by factors that include the background color and the illuminant.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the influence of using a gray background and a light-correcting device on visual shade selection.</p><h3>Material and methods</h3><p><span>Two experienced clinicians assessed the incisor color of 30 volunteers using the VITA 3D-MASTER shade guide. Visual analyses were carried out using or not (control) a gray background, with and without (control) a light-correcting device (Smile Lite). Furthermore, the use of a polarizing filter was evaluated. Data from a clinical spectrophotometer were defined as the standard instrumental analysis. The agreement and the similarity (based on the whitening indexes of tabs) were evaluated between instrumental and visual analyses. Statistical testing was conducted through ordinal </span>logistic regression and repeated-measures ANOVA. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to confirm the data distribution, and homogeneity of variance was assessed with the Levene test (α=.05)</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The use of Smile Lite resulted in lighter tabs than indicated by the instrumental analysis, and the opposite was observed in its absence. The polarizing filter did not affect the results (<em>P</em>>.05). For similarity, the illuminant improved the results (<em>P</em><.001). The gray background reduced the differences between visual and instrumental analysis only in the absence of the Smile Lite (<em>P</em><.001).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The color similarity between visual and instrumental analysis improved with the use of a light-correcting device with or without a polarization filter. A gray background was useful only without the light-correcting device.</p>","PeriodicalId":501672,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of a gray background and the illuminant on tooth shade selection\",\"authors\":\"Walleska Feijó Liberato, Eloah Nunes de Almeida, Marco Antonio Gallito, André Luis Faria-e-Silva, Luis Felipe Jochims Schneider, Larissa Maria Assad Cavalcante\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Statement of problem</h3><p>Visual shade selection in dentistry may be influenced by factors that include the background color and the illuminant.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the influence of using a gray background and a light-correcting device on visual shade selection.</p><h3>Material and methods</h3><p><span>Two experienced clinicians assessed the incisor color of 30 volunteers using the VITA 3D-MASTER shade guide. Visual analyses were carried out using or not (control) a gray background, with and without (control) a light-correcting device (Smile Lite). Furthermore, the use of a polarizing filter was evaluated. Data from a clinical spectrophotometer were defined as the standard instrumental analysis. The agreement and the similarity (based on the whitening indexes of tabs) were evaluated between instrumental and visual analyses. Statistical testing was conducted through ordinal </span>logistic regression and repeated-measures ANOVA. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to confirm the data distribution, and homogeneity of variance was assessed with the Levene test (α=.05)</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The use of Smile Lite resulted in lighter tabs than indicated by the instrumental analysis, and the opposite was observed in its absence. The polarizing filter did not affect the results (<em>P</em>>.05). For similarity, the illuminant improved the results (<em>P</em><.001). The gray background reduced the differences between visual and instrumental analysis only in the absence of the Smile Lite (<em>P</em><.001).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The color similarity between visual and instrumental analysis improved with the use of a light-correcting device with or without a polarization filter. A gray background was useful only without the light-correcting device.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
材料和方法两名经验丰富的临床医师使用 VITA 3D-MASTER 色度指南对 30 名志愿者的门牙颜色进行了评估。使用或不使用(对照组)灰色背景、使用或不使用(对照组)光校正设备(Smile Lite)进行视觉分析。此外,还对偏光滤镜的使用情况进行了评估。临床分光光度计的数据被定义为标准仪器分析。评估了仪器分析和视觉分析之间的一致性和相似性(基于标签的美白指数)。统计测试通过序数逻辑回归和重复测量方差分析进行。采用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验确认数据分布,并用 Levene 检验评估方差的同质性(α=.05)。偏光滤镜对结果没有影响(P>.05)。就相似度而言,光源改善了结果(P<.001)。只有在不使用 Smile Lite 的情况下,灰色背景才会减少视觉分析和仪器分析之间的差异(P< .001)。只有在不使用光校正仪的情况下,灰色背景才有用。
Influence of a gray background and the illuminant on tooth shade selection
Statement of problem
Visual shade selection in dentistry may be influenced by factors that include the background color and the illuminant.
Purpose
The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the influence of using a gray background and a light-correcting device on visual shade selection.
Material and methods
Two experienced clinicians assessed the incisor color of 30 volunteers using the VITA 3D-MASTER shade guide. Visual analyses were carried out using or not (control) a gray background, with and without (control) a light-correcting device (Smile Lite). Furthermore, the use of a polarizing filter was evaluated. Data from a clinical spectrophotometer were defined as the standard instrumental analysis. The agreement and the similarity (based on the whitening indexes of tabs) were evaluated between instrumental and visual analyses. Statistical testing was conducted through ordinal logistic regression and repeated-measures ANOVA. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to confirm the data distribution, and homogeneity of variance was assessed with the Levene test (α=.05)
Results
The use of Smile Lite resulted in lighter tabs than indicated by the instrumental analysis, and the opposite was observed in its absence. The polarizing filter did not affect the results (P>.05). For similarity, the illuminant improved the results (P<.001). The gray background reduced the differences between visual and instrumental analysis only in the absence of the Smile Lite (P<.001).
Conclusions
The color similarity between visual and instrumental analysis improved with the use of a light-correcting device with or without a polarization filter. A gray background was useful only without the light-correcting device.