资产配置的可持续风险偏好:高阶最优投资组合研究

IF 4.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance Pub Date : 2024-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100887
Antonio Díaz, Ana Escribano, Carlos Esparcia
{"title":"资产配置的可持续风险偏好:高阶最优投资组合研究","authors":"Antonio Díaz,&nbsp;Ana Escribano,&nbsp;Carlos Esparcia","doi":"10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper empirically investigates the financial performance of asset allocation strategies under “sustainable” risk preferences and conventional risk preferences. We assume that traditional investors and ESG investors behave differently in their investment decisions. The optimal portfolio choice is developed including dynamic higher order conditional co-moments and time-varying risk aversion. From an out-of-sample empirical experiment, we observe that this optimization technique provides much more stable optimal weights for the sustainable portfolio than for the traditional one. Based on both classical and downside-risk performance measures, active management in both portfolios outperforms the global market index. In this context, the non-inclusion of skewness and kurtosis leads to an underestimation of actual risk exposure. Finally, we provide empirical evidence that the sustainable portfolio largely outperformances the traditional investment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100887"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635024000029/pdfft?md5=726f6e8695846a4ea82fbbb947be53bf&pid=1-s2.0-S2214635024000029-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable risk preferences on asset allocation: a higher order optimal portfolio study\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Díaz,&nbsp;Ana Escribano,&nbsp;Carlos Esparcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper empirically investigates the financial performance of asset allocation strategies under “sustainable” risk preferences and conventional risk preferences. We assume that traditional investors and ESG investors behave differently in their investment decisions. The optimal portfolio choice is developed including dynamic higher order conditional co-moments and time-varying risk aversion. From an out-of-sample empirical experiment, we observe that this optimization technique provides much more stable optimal weights for the sustainable portfolio than for the traditional one. Based on both classical and downside-risk performance measures, active management in both portfolios outperforms the global market index. In this context, the non-inclusion of skewness and kurtosis leads to an underestimation of actual risk exposure. Finally, we provide empirical evidence that the sustainable portfolio largely outperformances the traditional investment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635024000029/pdfft?md5=726f6e8695846a4ea82fbbb947be53bf&pid=1-s2.0-S2214635024000029-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635024000029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635024000029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对 "可持续 "风险偏好和传统风险偏好下资产配置策略的财务绩效进行了实证研究。我们假设传统投资者和 ESG 投资者的投资决策行为不同。最优投资组合选择包括动态高阶条件共矩和时变风险规避。通过样本外实证实验,我们发现这种优化技术为可持续投资组合提供了比传统投资组合更稳定的最优权重。根据传统和下行风险绩效衡量标准,这两种投资组合的主动管理绩效都优于全球市场指数。在这种情况下,不纳入偏度和峰度会导致低估实际风险敞口。最后,我们提供的经验证据表明,可持续投资组合的表现在很大程度上优于传统投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainable risk preferences on asset allocation: a higher order optimal portfolio study

This paper empirically investigates the financial performance of asset allocation strategies under “sustainable” risk preferences and conventional risk preferences. We assume that traditional investors and ESG investors behave differently in their investment decisions. The optimal portfolio choice is developed including dynamic higher order conditional co-moments and time-varying risk aversion. From an out-of-sample empirical experiment, we observe that this optimization technique provides much more stable optimal weights for the sustainable portfolio than for the traditional one. Based on both classical and downside-risk performance measures, active management in both portfolios outperforms the global market index. In this context, the non-inclusion of skewness and kurtosis leads to an underestimation of actual risk exposure. Finally, we provide empirical evidence that the sustainable portfolio largely outperformances the traditional investment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
75
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Experimental Finance represent lenses and approaches through which we can view financial decision-making. The aim of the journal is to publish high quality research in all fields of finance, where such research is carried out with a behavioral perspective and / or is carried out via experimental methods. It is open to but not limited to papers which cover investigations of biases, the role of various neurological markers in financial decision making, national and organizational culture as it impacts financial decision making, sentiment and asset pricing, the design and implementation of experiments to investigate financial decision making and trading, methodological experiments, and natural experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance welcomes full-length and short letter papers in the area of behavioral finance and experimental finance. The focus is on rapid dissemination of high-impact research in these areas.
期刊最新文献
Riding the waves of investor sentiment: Cryptocurrency price and renewable energy volatility during the pandemic-war era Investor horizon, experience, and the disposition effect What makes depression babies different: Expectations or preferences? Luck in high-stakes firm lottery allocation: A natural experimental test of Coasean efficiency and invariance in a prominent sport finance setting Religion and household saving behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1