[食管异物:84 例病例回顾]。

Cristian Flórez Sarmiento, Viviana Parra Izquierdo, Juan Sebastian Frías Ordoñez, Jesús David Castillo, Eliana Murcia Monroy, Lidsay Delgado Cardona, Charlyn Stefani Rodríguez
{"title":"[食管异物:84 例病例回顾]。","authors":"Cristian Flórez Sarmiento, Viviana Parra Izquierdo, Juan Sebastian Frías Ordoñez, Jesús David Castillo, Eliana Murcia Monroy, Lidsay Delgado Cardona, Charlyn Stefani Rodríguez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The presence of esophageal foreign body (EFB) is a common emergency in gastroenterology. The protocol for management and endoscopic intervention can be variable among institutions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to define the clinical characteristics of EFB in adults, its radiological and endoscopic diagnosis, and complications based on a sample of patients in a gastroenterology center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>case series of patients admitted from the emergency department and referred to the gastroenterology department with a presumptive diagnosis of EFB. Clinical variables were collected, as well as characteristics, comorbidities, time of evolution and diagnostic opportunity, confirmatory studies, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>84 subjects, 70% men, mean age 45 (range: 17-87; SD 12.5) years. Urgent upper endoscopy was performed in 98.8% of the patients, with an average in-hospital stay of 2.5 days. 93% had no associated underlying pathology, in 6/84 (7.14%) patients structural or functional esophageal pathology was documented. 59/84 (70.2%) patients consulted in the first 24 hours, in 57.6% the presence of foreign body was confirmed endoscopically. In 67/84 (79.76%) patients radiography was performed prior to endoscopy, of which 62/67 (92.5%) had an abnormal result. Seventy percent of confirmed EFB were fish bones. The most frequent site of localization was in the cricopharyngeal region in 90% of the cases. In 66/84 (78.6%) subjects there was absence of complications, followed by deep laceration in 10/84 (11.9%) cases. In 3/84 (3.6%) cases complications requiring surgery were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic intervention in the first 24 hours is an opportune moment to identify complications and provide the indicated treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35807,"journal":{"name":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Esophageal foreign bodies: review of 84 cases].\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Flórez Sarmiento, Viviana Parra Izquierdo, Juan Sebastian Frías Ordoñez, Jesús David Castillo, Eliana Murcia Monroy, Lidsay Delgado Cardona, Charlyn Stefani Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The presence of esophageal foreign body (EFB) is a common emergency in gastroenterology. The protocol for management and endoscopic intervention can be variable among institutions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to define the clinical characteristics of EFB in adults, its radiological and endoscopic diagnosis, and complications based on a sample of patients in a gastroenterology center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>case series of patients admitted from the emergency department and referred to the gastroenterology department with a presumptive diagnosis of EFB. Clinical variables were collected, as well as characteristics, comorbidities, time of evolution and diagnostic opportunity, confirmatory studies, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>84 subjects, 70% men, mean age 45 (range: 17-87; SD 12.5) years. Urgent upper endoscopy was performed in 98.8% of the patients, with an average in-hospital stay of 2.5 days. 93% had no associated underlying pathology, in 6/84 (7.14%) patients structural or functional esophageal pathology was documented. 59/84 (70.2%) patients consulted in the first 24 hours, in 57.6% the presence of foreign body was confirmed endoscopically. In 67/84 (79.76%) patients radiography was performed prior to endoscopy, of which 62/67 (92.5%) had an abnormal result. Seventy percent of confirmed EFB were fish bones. The most frequent site of localization was in the cricopharyngeal region in 90% of the cases. In 66/84 (78.6%) subjects there was absence of complications, followed by deep laceration in 10/84 (11.9%) cases. In 3/84 (3.6%) cases complications requiring surgery were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic intervention in the first 24 hours is an opportune moment to identify complications and provide the indicated treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食管异物(EFB)是消化内科常见的急症。材料和方法:对急诊科收治并转诊至消化内科、推测诊断为 EFB 的患者进行病例系列分析。收集临床变量、特征、合并症、演变时间和诊断机会、确诊研究和并发症:84名受试者中,70%为男性,平均年龄45岁(范围:17-87岁;标准差12.5岁)。98.8%的患者接受了急诊上内镜检查,平均住院时间为2.5天。93%的患者没有相关的潜在病变,6/84(7.14%)的患者有食管结构性或功能性病变记录。59/84(70.2%)名患者在最初的 24 小时内就诊,其中 57.6% 的患者通过内镜确认了异物的存在。67/84(79.76%)名患者在内镜检查前进行了放射检查,其中 62/67(92.5%)名患者的检查结果异常。在确诊的 EFB 中,70% 为鱼骨。最常见的定位部位是环咽区,占 90%。在 66/84 例(78.6%)受检者中没有出现并发症,其次是 10/84 例(11.9%)出现深度裂伤。3/84(3.6%)的病例出现了需要手术的并发症:结论:在最初的 24 小时内进行内窥镜干预是发现并发症并提供相应治疗的最佳时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Esophageal foreign bodies: review of 84 cases].

The presence of esophageal foreign body (EFB) is a common emergency in gastroenterology. The protocol for management and endoscopic intervention can be variable among institutions.

Objective: to define the clinical characteristics of EFB in adults, its radiological and endoscopic diagnosis, and complications based on a sample of patients in a gastroenterology center.

Materials and methods: case series of patients admitted from the emergency department and referred to the gastroenterology department with a presumptive diagnosis of EFB. Clinical variables were collected, as well as characteristics, comorbidities, time of evolution and diagnostic opportunity, confirmatory studies, and complications.

Results: 84 subjects, 70% men, mean age 45 (range: 17-87; SD 12.5) years. Urgent upper endoscopy was performed in 98.8% of the patients, with an average in-hospital stay of 2.5 days. 93% had no associated underlying pathology, in 6/84 (7.14%) patients structural or functional esophageal pathology was documented. 59/84 (70.2%) patients consulted in the first 24 hours, in 57.6% the presence of foreign body was confirmed endoscopically. In 67/84 (79.76%) patients radiography was performed prior to endoscopy, of which 62/67 (92.5%) had an abnormal result. Seventy percent of confirmed EFB were fish bones. The most frequent site of localization was in the cricopharyngeal region in 90% of the cases. In 66/84 (78.6%) subjects there was absence of complications, followed by deep laceration in 10/84 (11.9%) cases. In 3/84 (3.6%) cases complications requiring surgery were identified.

Conclusions: Endoscopic intervention in the first 24 hours is an opportune moment to identify complications and provide the indicated treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: La REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGíA DEL PERÚ, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú que publica artículos originales, artículos de revisión, reporte de casos, cartas e información general de la especialidad; dirigido a los profesionales de la salud con especial interés en la gastroenterología. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú es una publicación de periodicidad trimestral y tiene como objetivo la publicación de artículos científicos inéditos en el campo de la gastroenterología, proporcionando información actualizada y relevante de la especialidad y áreas afines. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú publica artículos en dos idiomas, español e inglés, a texto completo en la versión impresa yelectrónica. Los artículos científicos son sometidos a revisores o árbitros nacionales e internacionales, especialistas que opinan bajo la modalidad de doble ciego y de manera anónima sobre la calidad y validez de los mismos. El número de revisores depende del tipo de artículo, dos revisores como mínimo para artículos originales y uno como mínimo para otros tipos de artículos.
期刊最新文献
[Commun salt application as a treatment for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy periostomal granuloma]. [Conventional colonoscopy vs. cap-assisted colonoscopy: there are differences in colonoscopy performance?] [Efficaccy of probiotic in the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Systematic review and meta-analysis]. [Evaluation of the usability of patients attended in gastrointestinal telemedicine postpandemic at University clinic]. [Procedure, reading and interpretation of capsule endoscopy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1