乳腺癌重建患者决策辅助工具:随机对照试验的系统综述和网络 Meta 分析。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011292
Yunjhen Su, Chin-Yu Sun, Wen-Kuan Chiu, Yi-No Kang, Chiehfeng Chen
{"title":"乳腺癌重建患者决策辅助工具:随机对照试验的系统综述和网络 Meta 分析。","authors":"Yunjhen Su, Chin-Yu Sun, Wen-Kuan Chiu, Yi-No Kang, Chiehfeng Chen","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer to become the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. There has been a dramatic increase in the use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. However, struggle in making decisions regarding breast reconstruction has existed. Thus, a study of decision aids (DAs) needs to be conducted, and further studies are needed to promote better DAs. This review discusses how DAs can be used to help women make decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. In addition, the review was the first to compare different DA formats to determine which one is most effective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors searched for relevant studies published before October of 2022 in PubMed and Embase using the medical subject headings \"breast reconstruction\" and \"decision aid.\" Demographic data and decision, outcomes, and instruments used for assessment were also collected. Risk of bias was measured by the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A network meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with a total of 1401 patients were included. A total of 90.9% participants presented usable results for evaluation of decisional conflict, and web-based DA (-0.3; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0.05) showed significant improvement; 50.3% of participants provided results of decisional regret, and no subgroups showed significant reduction; 60.3% of participants contributed to results for knowledge, and web-based DA (0.61; 95% CI, 0.01 to 1.21) showed the most positive effect. A total of 44.5% of participants were included for evaluation of satisfaction, and web-based DA (0.44; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.72) revealed significant increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review concluded that web-based DAs are the favorable format of DA.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, II.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"929-940"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Decision Aids for Breast Cancer Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Yunjhen Su, Chin-Yu Sun, Wen-Kuan Chiu, Yi-No Kang, Chiehfeng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer to become the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. There has been a dramatic increase in the use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. However, struggle in making decisions regarding breast reconstruction has existed. Thus, a study of decision aids (DAs) needs to be conducted, and further studies are needed to promote better DAs. This review discusses how DAs can be used to help women make decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. In addition, the review was the first to compare different DA formats to determine which one is most effective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors searched for relevant studies published before October of 2022 in PubMed and Embase using the medical subject headings \\\"breast reconstruction\\\" and \\\"decision aid.\\\" Demographic data and decision, outcomes, and instruments used for assessment were also collected. Risk of bias was measured by the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A network meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with a total of 1401 patients were included. A total of 90.9% participants presented usable results for evaluation of decisional conflict, and web-based DA (-0.3; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0.05) showed significant improvement; 50.3% of participants provided results of decisional regret, and no subgroups showed significant reduction; 60.3% of participants contributed to results for knowledge, and web-based DA (0.61; 95% CI, 0.01 to 1.21) showed the most positive effect. A total of 44.5% of participants were included for evaluation of satisfaction, and web-based DA (0.44; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.72) revealed significant increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review concluded that web-based DAs are the favorable format of DA.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"929-940\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011292\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011292","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌已超过肺癌,成为女性最常确诊的癌症。乳房切除术后乳房再造的使用率急剧上升。然而,在乳房再造的决策方面却存在着困难。因此,有必要进行决策辅助(DA),并需要进一步研究以促进更好的决策辅助。本综述讨论了如何使用决策辅助工具来帮助女性做出乳房切除术后乳房重建的决定。此外,该综述还首次比较了不同的DA形式,以确定哪种形式最有效:我们使用医学主题词 "乳房重建 "和 "辅助决策 "在 PubMed 和 Embase 中搜索了 2022 年 10 月之前发表的相关研究。我们还收集了人口统计学数据以及决策、结果和用于评估的工具。采用 Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2(RoB 2)工具测量偏倚风险:一项网络荟萃分析共纳入了 14 项 RCT,共计 1401 名患者。90.9%的参与者提供了可用的决策冲突评估结果,基于网络的DA(-0.3,95% CI -0.56至-0.05)有显著改善。50.3%的参与者提供了决策后悔的评估结果,没有任何亚组的评估结果显示后悔程度有明显降低。60.3%的参与者提供了知识方面的结果,而基于网络的发展议程(0.61,95% CI 0.01 至 1.21)显示了最积极的效果。44.5%的参与者参与了满意度评估,而基于网络的辅助决策工具(0.44,95% CI 0.15 至 0.72)的满意度显著提高:综述认为,基于网络的决策辅助工具是决策辅助工具中最受欢迎的形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Decision Aids for Breast Cancer Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer to become the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. There has been a dramatic increase in the use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. However, struggle in making decisions regarding breast reconstruction has existed. Thus, a study of decision aids (DAs) needs to be conducted, and further studies are needed to promote better DAs. This review discusses how DAs can be used to help women make decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. In addition, the review was the first to compare different DA formats to determine which one is most effective.

Methods: The authors searched for relevant studies published before October of 2022 in PubMed and Embase using the medical subject headings "breast reconstruction" and "decision aid." Demographic data and decision, outcomes, and instruments used for assessment were also collected. Risk of bias was measured by the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.

Results: A network meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with a total of 1401 patients were included. A total of 90.9% participants presented usable results for evaluation of decisional conflict, and web-based DA (-0.3; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0.05) showed significant improvement; 50.3% of participants provided results of decisional regret, and no subgroups showed significant reduction; 60.3% of participants contributed to results for knowledge, and web-based DA (0.61; 95% CI, 0.01 to 1.21) showed the most positive effect. A total of 44.5% of participants were included for evaluation of satisfaction, and web-based DA (0.44; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.72) revealed significant increase.

Conclusion: The review concluded that web-based DAs are the favorable format of DA.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, II.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
Ingress Time as a Metric for Indocyanine Green Angiographic Evaluation of Skin Flap Perfusion in Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction. MRI-Conditional Tissue Expanders in Breast Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Radiation Therapy Implications. One-Year Outcomes in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction. "Risk of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and Executive Function Impairment in Metopic Craniosynostosis". Electrical stimulation attenuates muscle atrophy induced by brachial plexus injury via upregulating HO-1 expression in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1